Here is a way to keep a wheel turning.

www.youtube.com... the idea is to make the up going side lighter and the down heavier and this is but a failure short of an example but it does expose needs and there are vast ways with both one or two and likely more then that amount of wheels used,

reply to post by MichelJCardin


Okay, this is the 4th or 5th posting of yours concerning (I think) free energy. Every single one of them is incomprehensible - what do you want? Where is the question or the point for discussion?

Could you please try to elaborate in deeper detail - or better still, describe your problem without sentences like "one wheel or two wheels and they are connected and whatnot" (similar).

reply to post by ManFromEurope


yeah man, i just don't get it, what was i looking at?

phew, i didnt want to post and sound mean, but like the guys above i have no clue as to what the main point is.

The video is terrible and seems like nonsense, your post didnt really help clear anything up or explain why it desurves a thread..

The wheel would fall and than it would stop moving.

Good job. *sarcasam*

Originally posted by MichelJCardin
the idea is to make the up going side lighter and the down heavier and this is but a failure short of an example but it does expose needs and there are vast ways with both one or two and likely more then that amount of wheels used.

I don't know how you would add a third wheel, unless you went to a see-saw device. Also, I'm not sure how what appears to be a rigid, pivoted structure would be able to make one side both heavier and lighter. (It doesn't seem as though you're trying to make one side lighter and the other heavier, but one side alternately heavier and lighter.) But perhaps I'm missing your point.

You know, MichelJCardin, the world of mechanics at the level of perpetual motion by using only levers, wheels, inclined planes, etc. has been pretty well explored. Would you consider looking into already published references to see some principles and concepts that have been tried in the past? That might free you to try other areas.

Charles1952

Originally posted by MichelJCardin
the idea is to make the up going side lighter and the down heavier

I think what you're trying to do has been tried for hundreds of years in different ways with no success.

You might want to take a look at this site: Museum of Unworkable Devices

reply to post by N3k9Ni




Yup, just had a look and thought this page would be most relevant

www.lhup.edu...

Put the big pole in the side, twist it for 90c at 37 g and when you get past the little side bit you get the flex of the motion. lol

reply to post by loves a conspiricy


The picture is just the idea and to elaborate; say the pole is a mile long and the wheel is small; then there is not much slope to consider where would be hard to move the see-saw and travsfer the force in to other dirrection and it also should be runing on an axe with a bearring and then if it is very heavy weighted at the axe area ; it would make it even more effective. The break in the arm was sopposed to clue you in on the distance of it's expantion; otherwise I would have not included it there of course.And although they have been trying to do these things for hundreds of years; the reason that they could not succeed is because it is hard to think of but funny how a few of the ways to do these things were right in front of their eyes. It is mostly by ways of trasfering of weights and at times swinging this to another position that makes possible these and making sure enoough disstence is applied to the trasfering object in terms of it and it's axe where then least change is occuring and thus ease is allowed for moving it.becaause there is then less change in it's gravity position ; for example ; if the area where the weight on this diagram would be suspended by an arm way down and would touch base at each of it's positions onto the stand that would then be the axe; well then it is less needing force to travel ; something like in those natures.
You guys drove me to trying something here that sould identify towards actions that occure where someone is swinging on a swing. I'll be on the front porch on the swing just a swinging.LOL

reply to post by MichelJCardin

and this is but a failure short of an example but it does expose needs

An example? You have a piece of paper with a poorly drawn lever and wheel.
But you're right, it does expose needs...
You need to see a psychologist. Please. You are showing signs of severe mental problems. Please talk to a psychologist.

reply to post by Ghost375


psychiatrist buddy rather because your psychologist is but a scientist of brains and it's ideaology functions and what not. There is a difference even if both words are in the same family.And what is wrong with you where you feel the need to decicrate someone like that and do you feel this need often?LOLObviously this thread went in the wrong place.

reply to post by MichelJCardin


Dear Michel J Cardin,

If you speak as you write I would say: Someone who talks without pauses seems to have ADHD or worse. Seek medical advice, it may help you. I hope you will feel better soon.

Sincerely,
ManFromEurope

PS: I know you won't. And that makes me a little sad. But we can't help everyone, especially if he/she doesn't want/accept help.

reply to post by ManFromEurope
You know; you might be right; I did spend most of my first time in high school sent in the hallway but then again the second time that I went ended up top with my cab parked outside having 100 in math and a pool table instaled for me because I was a pool shark at 10 that would have made pro's shy; not to mention can drive a 400 yard the first time and beat you at your game but can help you improbe it. Sorry dude but you might this time be wrong and whouldn't label people like you do because you know what is said of when one assumes right? I am not your average person because I take being doubted very seriously and always have.Seriously after spending all that time in those hallways; the principal was begging me to do things that would influence the other students the second time that I went; just give it up as I am only trying to make things interesting for both me and other and I mostly wonder about people that comment on others in rude manners; if they also are in this fassion with those that surround them and if yes; then one should maybe think of these others more and the affects that they will draw when years pass and things change; I am trying to explain that you don't and shouldn't expect th have any control apon anyone; especially me my man.I am far from being here to argue and expect nothing less of descent people as I would expect they would expect from me or anyone.

answer me, these questions three...

What be the piont of this thread?
What have you done or contributed to the topic?
Why do you think you need a forum disussion about it?

reply to post by Biigs


You know what; I am sorry that people are so difficult when it comes to threads and don't enen know the meaning of the word per say; but did assume that it was about a different if possible discution subject where some could provide their thoughts apon it. And for fun is usually the reason that I do things and in the intent of providing the same for others. No but really after thinking about this; are you telling me that neclear reactors have to be larger then those that would comply to this idea?
All that I ask is for people to be serious in terms of providing any opposed isues that would be at hand on subjects where I could then find solutions for these instead of a constaint almost becoming expected struggle of pride as it is seeming to me.