It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Biigs
Im a big supporter of the research and work going into decyphering the ancient texts and hyroglyphs.
I think theres major evidence of somthing interfearing in the development and disappearence of these wise and old civilizations.
Originally posted by charlyv
reply to post by Harte
Oh really. Please state the tools that were found that could possibly be used to face rock they way it had to have been done, other than a tool that could break rough rock out of a quarry.e
And , we are talking about rock cutting and facing tools. Not the tools found that were used to make statuary, like dolomite pounding rocks and copper based tools that rubbed sand to smooth and carve the statues.
Erich von Däniken's "Maya Astronaut" Pakal’s tomb has been the focus of attention by some "ancient astronaut" enthusiasts since its appearance in Erich von Däniken's 1968 best seller, Chariots of the Gods?. Von Däniken reproduced a drawing of the sarcophagus lid (incorrectly labeling it as being from "Copan") and comparing Pacal's pose to that of 1960s Project Mercury astronauts, interpreting drawings underneath him as rockets, and offering it as evidence of a supposed extraterrestrial influence on the ancient Maya.
In the center of that frame is a man sitting, bending forward. He has a mask on his nose, he uses his two hands to manipulate some controls, and the heel of his left foot is on a kind of pedal with different adjustments. The rear portion is separated from him; he is sitting on a complicated chair, and outside of this whole frame, you see a little flame like an exhaust.
Von Däniken's claim is not considered a credible interpretation by any professional Mayanist.
Originally posted by game over man
reply to post by Harte
Your first link doesn't work,
Originally posted by game over man
and so the Mayans used granite like the Egyptians? Why does that still debunk ET contact? To me it's still possible for ET to visit us. But do we have any evidence? Now that is another story...
Originally posted by game over man
Erich von Däniken's "Maya Astronaut" Pakal’s tomb has been the focus of attention by some "ancient astronaut" enthusiasts since its appearance in Erich von Däniken's 1968 best seller, Chariots of the Gods?. Von Däniken reproduced a drawing of the sarcophagus lid (incorrectly labeling it as being from "Copan") and comparing Pacal's pose to that of 1960s Project Mercury astronauts, interpreting drawings underneath him as rockets, and offering it as evidence of a supposed extraterrestrial influence on the ancient Maya.
In the center of that frame is a man sitting, bending forward. He has a mask on his nose, he uses his two hands to manipulate some controls, and the heel of his left foot is on a kind of pedal with different adjustments. The rear portion is separated from him; he is sitting on a complicated chair, and outside of this whole frame, you see a little flame like an exhaust.
Von Däniken's claim is not considered a credible interpretation by any professional Mayanist.
Wiki Link
The Lord Pakal video came out three days ago...
Originally posted by game over man
reply to post by Harte
Thanks for the reply. I'm not a big enthusiast on the Ancient Alien theory, but I do find it entertaining. All in all humans 100% built all the ancient structures, there still is a possibility they were visited by ET. I know that sounds really stubborn, but the Ancient Alien Theory uses structures and cave paintings as evidence while I simply use what we are doing in space currently in my own way to confirm that other life in the Universe could possibly be doing the same thing. And doing the same thing at a more advance rate. Unless we are the only life in the Universe.
Originally posted by Harte
Originally posted by game over man
reply to post by Harte
Thanks for the reply. I'm not a big enthusiast on the Ancient Alien theory, but I do find it entertaining. All in all humans 100% built all the ancient structures, there still is a possibility they were visited by ET. I know that sounds really stubborn, but the Ancient Alien Theory uses structures and cave paintings as evidence while I simply use what we are doing in space currently in my own way to confirm that other life in the Universe could possibly be doing the same thing. And doing the same thing at a more advance rate. Unless we are the only life in the Universe.
It is perfectly reasonable to assume that there is intelligent life elswhere in the galaxy, and maybe even all over the galaxy.
However, assuming some sort of routine interstellar travel is full-on fantasy.
Obviously, it's possible that aliens visit the Earth and have in the past as well. But regarding the past, at least, there's no evidence at all for this and thus no reason at all to believe it.
Makes for fun speculation, I'll admit. But people here fully believe in this inanity.
Harte
Originally posted by olddognewtricks
reply to post by discharged77
OK if they are here they are obviously highly evolved organisms. And what do you have when you have highly evolved organisms? You have VIRUSES THAT HAVE A STRICTLY SYMBIOTIC RELATIONSHIP WITH THOSE HIGHLY EVOLVED ORGANISMS!!!!! And no matter how thorough the alien visitor were in hygiene, a LOT of those alien viruses would have made it across the cosmos along with those alien visitors. In many cases, viruses outside of a host do not die rather they become dormant.
THE SMOKING GUN that will once and for all prove that we are not alone is the discovery of alien viruses here on this planet. The visitors themselves are way to advanced to allow us to detect them directly in most cases. But nature has a funny way of slipping through. We need to search and test specifically for viruses that do not match the typical chromosomal patterns, for are comprised of proteins that do not have the classic "L" conformation.