It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Right. I suggest anyone interested, read the NETBible.org version. I am advocating reading it an to the best of individual' ability, to understand the Hebrew. I offer this as the alternative to going by stuff I consider the ancient version of science-fiction.
That's your opinion, not fact.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by Praetorius
Right. I suggest anyone interested, read the NETBible.org version. I am advocating reading it an to the best of individual' ability, to understand the Hebrew. I offer this as the alternative to going by stuff I consider the ancient version of science-fiction.
That's your opinion, not fact.
ETA: of course it can not be stressed too much how these wanna-be books are far predated by the Genesis version which the others just make wild speculation about.edit on 23-9-2011 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by lonewolf19792000
I have a question for you.
Who is Canaan?
When and where was he born and who were his parents?
Originally posted by windword
If demons are impregnating women, wouldn't it show up in DNA?
It seems to me that the legend goes, God created a flood and saved Noah and his family because they were pure. I think that means DNA pure. Everybody else was extinguished.
I think the legend puts an end to the "cross breeding" idea, at least until we do it ourselves in labratories.
Noah was spared because he was righteous. We do not know about his wife or his sons wives as they are not mentioned by name. They could have come from that "race" of beings. But we know that angels and demons cannot procreate. Jesus says that we are going to be like them in heaven, not given or taken in marriage. I am sure that Jesus was aware of the Jewish myths because He was Jewish and grew up in Jewish culture.We are not supposed to listen to old wives tales, because some are so silly.
That's in Jude, which was probably written around 150 ad and probably got into the NT canon because Athanasius like it, who was a violent sort of person and that would appeal to him (the concept of punishment in this world as an example of the coming punishment), along with the everlasting fire which is only in Jude.
Paul says "Enoch prophesied of these things saying "I saw the Lord's return with ten thousands thousands of His saints".
You sound like "Mystery Babylon" of Revelation, adopting Sumerian texts as authority, the place where God led Abraham FROM.
You can find this account in the Enuma Elish which is a more in depth part of the story of the Bible.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by WarminIndy
That's in Jude, which was probably written around 150 ad and probably got into the NT canon because Athanasius like it, who was a violent sort of person and that would appeal to him (the concept of punishment in this world as an example of the coming punishment), along with the everlasting fire which is only in Jude.
Paul says "Enoch prophesied of these things saying "I saw the Lord's return with ten thousands thousands of His saints".edit on 24-9-2011 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by windword
If demons are impregnating women, wouldn't it show up in DNA?
It seems to me that the legend goes, God created a flood and saved Noah and his family because they were pure. I think that means DNA pure. Everybody else was extinguished.
I think the legend puts an end to the "cross breeding" idea, at least until we do it ourselves in labratories.
I read the Bible and not the other books, so I can keep it straight in my head. The Bible does not say the Nephilim were a problem.
. . .it will be "as it was in the days of Noah", and the Nephilim were a large part of the problem then.
The book of Enoch was ultimately rejected in 364 AD at the Council of Laodicea. The fact that this act of betrayal against the earlier traditions happened in the church of Laodicea is stunningly prophetic, for the Prophet of Revelation has more harsh words for Laodicea than any other church in Asia,
I will spit you out of my mouth… You are wretched, miserable, poor, blind, and naked… be zealous, therefore, and repent.[4]
Discontented by this critique of their town, Laodicea tried to remove Revelation from the Bible too, in addition to Enoch, but the Council of Carthage superceded them. Should we allow these Laodicean heretics to have the final say on Enoch?