It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bottleslingguy
reply to post by MrXYZ
which claims are you talking about please quote or rather yet just show me why you think they were saying something else. What do you think they mean by "those who from heaven came to earth"?
k if he didn't share his data, what exactly did he share?
No, Pye didn't share any real data...all he did was make random claims and then asked you to believe him even without proper data...the same I'm doing here. Glad you believe him though, and glad you also believe in my giant unicorns
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by MrXYZ
k if he didn't share his data, what exactly did he share?
No, Pye didn't share any real data...all he did was make random claims and then asked you to believe him even without proper data...the same I'm doing here. Glad you believe him though, and glad you also believe in my giant unicorns
Have you ever thought about just sending him an email and asking?
If it's released, then please present me a copy of the scientific research papers on the skull verified by a lab.
So I said it right. It's subjective if you read it wrong. I think your reading it wrong.
Lol. You really just like to make stuff up. Interpretation has nothing to do with whether something is subjective or objective. Objective evidence is based on facts and can be verified and examined for yourself. Subjective is based on lack of understanding, story books, or anything else that can't be duplicated and verified (ex the complexity of nature, humans don't belong because of disease, etc).
What you mean to say is no one has proven him wrong or taken the steps to challenge his findings. And again, your welcome to anytime. Everyone wants to squak there box about how he is wrong but no one is providing any proof of it.
That's the great thing about science. If you don't believe an experiment you can do it yourself and see what happens. Scientific results are not subjective. Pye or Bible stories are not objective until Pye provides the scientific data, which he hasn't.
What I mean is I doubt if that alone determins authenticity, or the lack of. In other words just because its not peer reviewed doesn't automatically mean its false.
Um, in science it does.
I hear ya. Some of them are pretty sad for sure, which one you watching?
Well, based on some of our reality TV programs I don't blame you for thinking we devolved.
Hey I challenge the proportion thing by comparison. Is there a site you found about this?
Evolution isn't goal-driven. We adapted a big brain for a reason; what we do with it is up to us, not evolution. We're not the only ones. Chimps have been known to exterminate each other. Spider monkeys. Ants (which have the largest brain in proportion to size).
Again, we're not special in this
A chimp breaks off a long grass stalk or a reed so she may use it later, hundreds of meters away, more than an hour in the future, to lure delectable termites out of a log or termite mound. She must remove superfluous leaves and twigs, shape it, shorten it, insert it into the termite tunnel with a deft twisting motion to follow the interior contours, shake it seductively to attract termites onto it, and then with great care remove it without scraping off too many. Chimps take years to perfect their technique and routinely teach it to their young, who are avid pupils. This exactly satisfies one confident definition of "the uniqueness of man's toolmaking"-namely, "the fashioning, out of natural materials, of an implement designed to be used at a distant time and on objects not now perceptually present."
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by MrXYZ
So all he shared was the word fiction and you are contesting this?
Fiction?
Originally posted by HappyBunny
Evolution isn't goal-driven. We adapted a big brain for a reason*; what we do with it is up to us, not evolution. We're not the only ones. Chimps have been known to exterminate each other. Spider monkeys. Ants (which have the largest brain in proportion to size).
Again, we're not special in this.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
That's the whole point, you merely know what people back then BELIEVED based on their limited knowledge. The Mayans believed Cortes was a god too, doesn't mean he was
I think you're confusing objective evidence with subjective evidence...the latter is clearly not reliable
A chimp breaks off a long grass stalk or a reed so she may use it later, hundreds of meters away, more than an hour in the future, to lure delectable termites out of a log or termite mound. She must remove superfluous leaves and twigs, shape it, shorten it, insert it into the termite tunnel with a deft twisting motion to follow the interior contours, shake it seductively to attract termites onto it, and then with great care remove it without scraping off too many. Chimps take years to perfect their technique and routinely teach it to their young, who are avid pupils. This exactly satisfies one confident definition of "the uniqueness of man's toolmaking"-namely, "the fashioning, out of natural materials, of an implement designed to be used at a distant time and on objects not now perceptually present."
www.mesacc.edu...
Thats because your once again reading it incorrectly. Heaven is actually another planet and from the best I can figure out, its OUR HOME planet. If you read hebrews it makes it very clear that earth is NOT our home and people complaining because there are far better planets we could have been dumped on.
Christians speak of heaven too...doesn't mean it exists
That's the whole point, you merely know what people back then BELIEVED based on their limited knowledge. The Mayans believed Cortes was a god too, doesn't mean he was
I think you're confusing objective evidence with subjective evidence...the latter is clearly not reliable
You mean in the same way that you are contesting what he has presented. I don't see you coming up with anything that proves him wrong, your just saying hes wrong.
No...all his claims are fiction because he never bothered to back them up with facts and objective evidence
And if something is not backed up by evidence, it's fiction...made up...a "nice story".
Originally posted by LilDudeissocool
Originally posted by LogiosHermes27
reply to post by LilDudeissocool
lol,never little dude.
i was told it will be quick,but this is in the far future.
Okay, well just keep me updated if you can?
Hey, have you been doing any astral projecting as of late?
I ask this cuz...
Last night our cable box for the TV turned off on its own, but we were still able to watch TV. The remote didn't work. This went on for about an hour. Then the box came back on and everything returned to normal.
This morning we all woke up to banging at our front door. Then it stopped. When we opened up the door. No one was around. Minutes later the smoke detectors all went off for no reason.
Then I noticed a piece of paper that had been on the floor the night before that I had been too lazy to pick up was sitting on my desk where a lotto ticket was, and the lotto ticket was on the floor where piece of paper was laying.
Nothing strange like those events have happened for awhile. Last time things like that happened you and Arnie were able to tell me what kind of walls I had, "Remember "yellow?" and then you posted an emoticon eating ice cream when I had just gone into the kitchen to do just that. You also told me I was going to sleep when I was planning to go somewhere. The plans fell through and I did just that. A few other things like that happened too as I remember. So when strange unexplainable things happen around me you and your astral pals are the first who come to mind.
Originally posted by bottleslingguy
Originally posted by MrXYZ
That's the whole point, you merely know what people back then BELIEVED based on their limited knowledge. The Mayans believed Cortes was a god too, doesn't mean he was
I think you're confusing objective evidence with subjective evidence...the latter is clearly not reliable
Those are some really silly comments and have no bearing on anything.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by MrXYZ
You mean in the same way that you are contesting what he has presented. I don't see you coming up with anything that proves him wrong, your just saying hes wrong.
No...all his claims are fiction because he never bothered to back them up with facts and objective evidence
And if something is not backed up by evidence, it's fiction...made up...a "nice story".