It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Beamish
60, 000 people killed...
Ok. Let's do a little speculative math, shall we?
Perhaps 45,000 of them have two siblings................................90, 000
Perhaps they all have one living parent.....................................60, 000
Perhaps they all have at least two aunts/uncles......................120, 000
Perhaps half of them are married.............................................30, 000
Perhaps half of them have at least two chldren..........................60, 000
Perhaps they all have at least four friends................................240, 000
Potentially six hundred thousand family etc. out there missing these people and there is no massive public outcry?
Oh, please...
Originally posted by Snippy23
reply to post by fah0436
Why would anybody think that 'insiders' would tell David Wilcock anything, when he's just going to exchange everything he hears for money? This is a line so many ranters - Jones, Icke etc - use, that they are given secret information by sources whose views they so publicly oppose. Why would that happen?
We're not really talking about him having secret, true information, are we? We're talking about him sustaining and feeding a dumb hoax from an established hoaxer, and I don't see how the supposed cruel death of 60,000 people is so exciting that it can support two threads on ATS. Random death just isn't that great, is it?
Originally posted by malcr
Originally posted by Beamish
60, 000 people killed...
Ok. Let's do a little speculative math, shall we?
Perhaps 45,000 of them have two siblings................................90, 000
Perhaps they all have one living parent.....................................60, 000
Perhaps they all have at least two aunts/uncles......................120, 000
Perhaps half of them are married.............................................30, 000
Perhaps half of them have at least two chldren..........................60, 000
Perhaps they all have at least four friends................................240, 000
Potentially six hundred thousand family etc. out there missing these people and there is no massive public outcry?
Oh, please...
And the unpaid bills, the homes etc. All of which increases the chances of somebody noticing. Some of those 60,000 will know the same person and/or have the same family members.
No chance in hell can 60,000 disappear at the same time without being noticed.
Anyway any nuclear explosion is detectable around the world by the increase in radioactive particles in the atmosphere.
The "usual" nuclear weapon yield—expressed as kT TNT equivalent—is not a measure of a neutron weapon's destructive power. It refers only to the energy released (mostly heat and blast), and does not express the lethal effect of neutron radiation on living organisms. Compared to a fission bomb with the identical explosive yield, a neutron bomb would emit about ten times[3] the amount of neutron radiation
ER weapons are meant to kill a much higher percentage of enemy personnel inside such protected environments through the release of a higher percentage of their yield in the form of neutron ionizing radiation, against which even tank armor is not very effective.
Originally posted by malcr
Originally posted by Beamish
60, 000 people killed...
Ok. Let's do a little speculative math, shall we?
Perhaps 45,000 of them have two siblings................................90, 000
Perhaps they all have one living parent.....................................60, 000
Perhaps they all have at least two aunts/uncles......................120, 000
Perhaps half of them are married.............................................30, 000
Perhaps half of them have at least two chldren..........................60, 000
Perhaps they all have at least four friends................................240, 000
Potentially six hundred thousand family etc. out there missing these people and there is no massive public outcry?
Oh, please...
And the unpaid bills, the homes etc. All of which increases the chances of somebody noticing. Some of those 60,000 will know the same person and/or have the same family members.
No chance in hell can 60,000 disappear at the same time without being noticed.
Anyway any nuclear explosion is detectable around the world by the increase in radioactive particles in the atmosphere.
Originally posted by Plumbduff
As soon as I saw David Wilcock's smug face I never bothered to watch ... sorry
Originally posted by Beamish
60, 000 people killed...
Ok. Let's do a little speculative math, shall we?
Perhaps 45,000 of them have two siblings................................90, 000
Perhaps they all have one living parent.....................................60, 000
Perhaps they all have at least two aunts/uncles......................120, 000
Perhaps half of them are married.............................................30, 000
Perhaps half of them have at least two chldren..........................60, 000
Perhaps they all have at least four friends................................240, 000
Potentially six hundred thousand family etc. out there missing these people and there is no massive public outcry?
Oh, please...