It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by Jepic
Just a thought here, but the most recent numbers for the NYPD put their manpower at roughly 34,500 Officers. Kick who out again?? Lol.... If those yuppie kids actually managed to force the police to take a few steps back, the few dozen would grow into hundreds or, if needed, THOUSANDS of Police the second time they moved in. Lets have a REAL protest. Even Israel managed to pull off a serious show of 'pissed off' with over 400,000 on the street. THAT kind of protest changes things....This? This just gives TPTB some passing amusement and an arrest record for the kids.
Wall Street Occupation #1
Wall Street Occupation #2
C'mon, lets at least stay honest about what we see happening. This was no protest. This was a party the cops became tired of putting up with as it went into a 4th day.
Originally posted by filosophia
Originally posted by Swills
reply to post by omarm1984
...I wouldn't call those arrests violent, more like uncomfortable arrests.
...Violence is the wrong choice and the only choice for those who cannot think.
It wouldn't be violence, it would just be "uncomfortable", right?
For someone who doesn't like violence, you sure are lenient when it comes to cops using violence. I guess a bloodied finger and loss of circulation is not violent to you?
Originally posted by Swills
Originally posted by filosophia
Originally posted by Swills
reply to post by omarm1984
...I wouldn't call those arrests violent, more like uncomfortable arrests.
...Violence is the wrong choice and the only choice for those who cannot think.
It wouldn't be violence, it would just be "uncomfortable", right?
I suppose you're trying to make a humorous play on words with my posts? I suppose you think those arrests were violent? They were not.
Originally posted by Swills
Originally posted by UniverSoul
Originally posted by Swills
reply to post by UniverSoul
No. You are wrong. How old are you? You don't have to answer but I'm assuming you're young and don't understand how the world works.
Violent revolution is never the answer. It worked for our forefathers but that doesn't mean it will work again. Just look at the French revolution, and learn what a complete tragedy that was. You really think Americans can handle a violent revolution? You've got to be kidding me!edit on 20-9-2011 by Swills because: (no reason given)
haha im very young
and i would safely say that i understand very well the way the world works
nothing is really going to change if we dont take action.
you can do all the peaceful protest you want but nothing will change. and even if something does it wont be significant
do you honestly think the world is heading for a bright future if we dont do something? and if so how
All youngsters think they know everything, which of course what they know is very little. What you & I don't know could fill all the libraries in all of the world and then some. You clearly don't know how anything works if you think violence is the answer and peaceful protests get you nowhere I'm not even gonna point you in the right direction to show you how wrong you are, because you wouldn't bother to listen.
You don't know jack. Responding to you and repeating myself is a waste of my time. Hopefully others will see this as well and ignore your comments.
Originally posted by Swills
reply to post by UniverSoul
Violence is the wrong choice and the only choice for those who cannot think.
Originally posted by filosophia
Originally posted by Swills
Originally posted by filosophia
Originally posted by Swills
reply to post by omarm1984
...I wouldn't call those arrests violent, more like uncomfortable arrests.
...Violence is the wrong choice and the only choice for those who cannot think.
It wouldn't be violence, it would just be "uncomfortable", right?
I suppose you're trying to make a humorous play on words with my posts? I suppose you think those arrests were violent? They were not.
So according to you, we can tie up the hands of the cops and bankers until their hands have lost circulation, make their fingers bleed, step on their backs and have people shout "he can't breath" and that would be Ghandi-like non-violence?
What a crazy world you live in.
Originally posted by Swills
Originally posted by UniverSoul
Originally posted by Swills
reply to post by UniverSoul
No. You are wrong. How old are you? You don't have to answer but I'm assuming you're young and don't understand how the world works.
Violent revolution is never the answer. It worked for our forefathers but that doesn't mean it will work again. Just look at the French revolution, and learn what a complete tragedy that was. You really think Americans can handle a violent revolution? You've got to be kidding me!edit on 20-9-2011 by Swills because: (no reason given)
haha im very young
and i would safely say that i understand very well the way the world works
nothing is really going to change if we dont take action.
you can do all the peaceful protest you want but nothing will change. and even if something does it wont be significant
do you honestly think the world is heading for a bright future if we dont do something? and if so how
All youngsters think they know everything, which of course what they know is very little. What you & I don't know could fill all the libraries in all of the world and then some. You clearly don't know how anything works if you think violence is the answer and peaceful protests get you nowhere I'm not even gonna point you in the right direction to show you how wrong you are, because you wouldn't bother to listen.
You don't know jack. Responding to you and repeating myself is a waste of my time. Hopefully others will see this as well and ignore your comments.
Originally posted by Swills
Just because someone uses the word violent to describe an arrest by police doesn't mean it is.
The police now have to use force to make the arrest but that force isn't violence.
Originally posted by Jepic
We don't need protests. We need a revolution.
Originally posted by filosophia
Originally posted by Swills
Just because someone uses the word violent to describe an arrest by police doesn't mean it is.
The police now have to use force to make the arrest but that force isn't violence.
So according to your logic, we can use as much force as we want so long as we don't call it violence?
Originally posted by Swills
Why ATS gave you a silver lining is beyond me. You are not a contributor in my opinion.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Originally posted by Jepic
We don't need protests. We need a revolution.
I'll agree to a point. Radical change is fast becoming the only real choice left us as all other avenues close before our eyes or, in the case of voting, become so corrupt it's laughable to think the effort is even worth it for national races.
Having said that, and agreed with the overall concept, I have to note something here. In Egypt or Tunisia it was fairly clear. 'Us vs Them' and no one had any illusions as to the end game when one side or the other won the struggle. America is NOTHING remotely close. It's about a hundred groups of 'Us' vs 'Them'. That wouldn't be a real problem if most of those groups weren't also equally interested in going after EACH OTHER almost as much as 'Them'.
Revolution may very well come again to our land...but it'll be a bloody mess IMHO. No romance, no real heroes and certainly nothing to compare to the romantic vision of rebellion so many seem to carry. It's something I won't hide from, when or if it comes, but all the same...I'll remain hopeful against logic that it doesn't happen. There is nothing attractive about millions of my fellow countrymen dead in the streets and fields, regardless of who wins in the end. Just my take.
Originally posted by omarm1984
reply to post by UniverSoul
I doubt real change can take place in a society so set in its old ways such as this one. The only choice I see is to create our own community built on a resource based economy.