Whats the most realistic UFO pic your've seen

Here's my favorite :



Well I like to believe that this plane was based off UFO designs. It did come out of Area 51, no?

Originally posted by AlexParadox

Originally posted by XPhiles
i like this one.

so fake, but it still looks kool,
im saying its fake cuz of its distinctive 3d model look

yeah, I had fun makng that pic.
But it is something that I saw back in 79

here is another I made

UFO's over Art Bells house..........
The loop antenna is real!



Art and Ramona Bells actual sighting in Pahrump, Nevada in 1995.
Artist rendering..........



My picture taken on 8/24/2004 near Area 51.
Okay....okay I dubbed in the UFO!

Originally posted by MountainStar
UFO's over Art Bells house..........
The loop antenna is real!



Art and Ramona Bells actual sighting in Pahrump, Nevada in 1995.
Artist rendering..........


My picture taken on 8/24/2004 near Area 51.
Okay....okay I dubbed in the UFO!

The Bob Lazar sport model is kewl lol and so is that loop antenna.
Glad im not the only one to see a Triangle craft

The sparse vegetation in the desert is so beautiful. Wish I could live out there.

Originally posted by Blackout
Here's my favorite

:



Well I like to believe that this plane was based off UFO designs. It did come out of Area 51, no?

B2 bomber, supposably the last manned stealth bomber (newer stealth bombers are either remote controlled or A.I. )

yea well, it probvly was tested there at 51, but then again, there are other 'area's like 52 for example, their all testing areas, so yea

Area 51 was the test site for the B2 Stealth bomber. The newest version the B2 Spirit was also tested there.

To Alex paradox.
Hi Alex, the first step about B2, Aurora, Triangles, ..ets engines.
You must know the following:
On planet EART we have: the solid matter and the fluid matter.
Thr solid is solid;rock, ground , table , you ,me,ets ets.
The fluid is divised in: liquid and gaz (air ). Right ?
Help for you . To understand litle about the flying mechines or submarins
you must have just litle notions---FLUIDS.
But----2 ways: or long years MIT or here:
jp-petit.com...
One exactly what you need
1) Engineer of fluids
2) Astrophysics research

regards chapo

PS. Be sure is good one.

Alex,Did u just sy SUPPOSABLY?

1978... A friend of mine has slides of an object descending to the ground. It was about 2000 feet from their house, in an open field on a hill top. Obviously metallic with lights, it hovered just above the ground for a few minutes, until his father, a high school science teacher, started walking towards it. It then rose up in to the air and into the cloud cover. This all happened right after an particuarly intense thunderstorm, with an oddly colored sky. I've seen the slides, and while they do not claim it to be a UFO (They simply state they don't know what it was...) I do not either, other than that it was not ball lightning, a helicopter or plane, or a mirage....

[edit on 9/10/2004 by soulforge]

Originally posted by IXRAZORXI321
www.ufoevidence.org...

Yes this one is good, and recent. It was taken in Utah, a hotbed of ufo activity of late.

Most of them are specs or blobs though...sigh

I prefer pre-photoshop images, see Matthew Hurley site

soulforge if your able to get those slides to show us that would be epic
Even if it is'nt a ufo. It would be good to see what it is from the story you told. No one heard about the Danny carey photo?

TOOL is frigging cool.

What a great show they put on.

Are they making a new album?

This is one of my favs, I like it alot.....

I saw this SAME KIND on another web-site, over Mt. Etna--

www.ufoevidence.org...

First pic

Second pic 15 minutes later

Third pic 30 minutes later




Cute.

Actually, quite a few, mostly during some of the earlier days of the UFO flaps (mostly in the 50's) are pretty realistic, and prior to photoshop, digital, etc. These are the ones I like to examine (and to find a few examples, I'm sure I'd have to surf a bit, most are remembered from books....probably wouldn't hurt to archive them though).

I prefer the route of documentation though, as cameras can be easily fooled, just as the eye can, and there are many hoaxers out there as well. Even if you threw out every photo and video, the documentation alone would make the case for UFOs and a government coverup surrounding them. My favorite videos are the gun camera films, as they are taken by reliable witnesses who are very familiar with aerial phenomena, and less likely to make mistaken identities. Again, with photos, those accompanied by good documentation, a reliable witness, etc. are great evidence. The sighting account is just as important (often moreso) than the photo itself.

In july 1998 Popular Mechanics listed six "Sightings they can't explain away".

Two of these, which are also two of my fav pics, are:

May 11th, 1950, McMinnville, Oregon, photos by Mr Paul Trent

and

Trindade Island 16 January, 1958

I too prefer pre-photoshop pictures.

The Trent photos seem pretty much impossible to debunk, and that other one is nice too^

Originally posted by soulforge
and while they do not claim it to be a UFO (They simply state they don't know what it was...)

The fact that they dont know what it was makes it by definition, a UFO.

Originally posted by senshido
Two of these, which are also two of my fav pics, are:

May 11th, 1950, McMinnville, Oregon, photos by Mr Paul Trent

The Trent photos are classics, and my favorites as well. Absolutely authentic looking.

What about the Billy Meier Photos?
I always found them to be really superb. His story was a bit fantastic though, but the pics are pretty cool.

Would be tough for a poor one-handed farmer to perpetrate a Hoax of this scale. I believe those photos.

I'm not familiar with the Billy Meier photos. Want to provide a link?

You know--www.ufoevidence.org...

This is 339 photographs, with a couple of duplicates thrown in.

It is salient to the thread--

www.abovetopsecret.com...'

because someONE(s) is driving these UFOs all over the place. They're not operating by remote control, you know.

They have (presumably) sentient pilots at the controls--humans? Or who?