It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by WarminIndy
Who is, Him, the person in the Bible?
What I am saying is there is another Jesus being taught who is not in the Bible but they have a convincing rhetoric to go with it, along with a different name.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by WarminIndy
Who is, Him, the person in the Bible?
What I am saying is there is another Jesus being taught who is not in the Bible but they have a convincing rhetoric to go with it, along with a different name.
Originally posted by WarminIndy
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by akushla99
How ARE they saved?
You tell me.
By faith.
I was talking about people who refuse to say, Jesus, not because they have a learning disability or speak another language but refuse on the grounds that they have to say it in Hebrew or Aramaic, believing they have to in order to tie Jesus into a connection with the angel Moses spoke to in the burning bush.
Find me a bible verse that hints at my sin of mispronouncing Jesus name
Is that what it is called?
Just what are you referring to? The Gnostic Gospel? You said they are trying to gain esoteric knowledge. I think you have been saying that unless someone believes in the 1611 KJV, then they can't be saved. So I ask, what about those in 1610?
You on the one hand say that people can only say Jesus to be saved then you imply on the other that his name is only found in the 1611 KJV.
Are you saying the only true version is the 1611 KJV? Because to a lot of us, that is what it sounds like you are saying.
Are you referring to the Sacred Name Only movement?
Is refusing to say, Jesus, thinking it is an evil name, part of Christian doctrine?
Originally posted by boony
Trinity
Resurrection
Incarnate birth
Parousia (personal visible return of Jesus)
Atonement
Deity....... of Jesus, Emmanuel, "The Word", Yeshua or any variation of the name of the Son of God, are the tenets of Christianity.
What is implied by the OP is not Christian doctrine at all.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by WarminIndy
Is that what it is called?
Just what are you referring to? The Gnostic Gospel? You said they are trying to gain esoteric knowledge. I think you have been saying that unless someone believes in the 1611 KJV, then they can't be saved. So I ask, what about those in 1610?
You on the one hand say that people can only say Jesus to be saved then you imply on the other that his name is only found in the 1611 KJV.
Are you saying the only true version is the 1611 KJV? Because to a lot of us, that is what it sounds like you are saying.
Are you referring to the Sacred Name Only movement?
I don't know but there are people who make threads saying if you say Jesus and God, then you are going to hell. I am making a counter thread saying, no, they are going to hell for being like that.edit on 19-9-2011 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by jmdewey60
I don't know but there are people who make threads saying if you say Jesus and God, then you are going to hell. I am making a counter thread saying, no, they are going to hell for being like that.
I more than disagree and probably because of the abuse I receive for not adopting their philosophy and called names and damned, not in a hypothetical way but as if they would like to personally send me on my way.
Well to them I would still disagree.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by Haxsaw
Another happy nonjudgmental Christian I see.