It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by 11I11
To help your thread we could do with a summary, perhaps some bullet points outlining the main points this guy is trying to get across. It may help get the message across to lazy people like myselfedit on 18-9-2011 by 11I11 because: (no reason given)
It's good information but it took that long to copy and paste it? I would have guessed 10 minutes.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
I do highly suggest however that you read the entire transcript, I spent several hours writing it today because it is that meaningful and important.
Originally posted by vox2442
Next time, try googling the source. You can download a pdf of the official transcript - in English - from here: en.crms-jpn.com...
So let's call it 20-30 of the 0.015 megaton Hiroshima bombs. That's about 0.3 - 0.45 megatons. Let's put that in perspective:
"So, using our knowledge base at the Radioisotope Center, we
calculated. Based on the thermal output, it is 29.6 times the
amount released by the nuclear bomb dropped on Hiroshima. In
uranium equivalent, it is 20 Hiroshima bombs.
Sakharov estimated in 1957 that for each megaton worth of nuclear bomb testing, we ended up with 10000 extra human deaths due to cancers and birth defects (visible or invisible) from radioactive "fall out." ...
So far, over 2000 nukes have been tested worldwide. The total megatonnage of above-ground tests so far has been about 440 megatons, i.e. 4.4 million deaths according to Sakharov's estimate.
Originally posted by Akasirus
I think it's great that you are tying to share this information, but please don't take credit for other people's work. You make it sound as if you did us all a favor by painstakingly transcribing and translating video, when in reality you simply copied and pasted someone else's work. Not only without credit to them, but also explicitly claiming it as your own.
However in the case of the Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant accident, 5 microsieverts within 100km radius (Tokai-Mura), .5 microsievert within 200km radius (Tokyo area) and the radiation extended far beyond, even to teas in Ashigara and Shizuoka, as everybody now knows.
"However, in the case of the Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant accident, 5 microsieverts within 100-kilometer radius [he is referring to Tokai-mura], 0.5 microsievert within 200-kilometer radius [referring to Tokyo area], and the radiation extended far beyond, even to teas in Ashigara and Shizuoka, as everybody now knows."
"Chief Cabinet Secretary Edano said at that time, "There is no immediate effect on health". I actually thought this was going to be a big, big problem. Why was I concerned? Because the current Radiation Protection
Law is based on dealing with a small amount of radioactive materials that
emit very high radiation. In this case the total radioactive materials is
not much of an issue. What matters is how high the radiation is.
"Chief Cabinet Secretary Edano said at that time, "There is no immediate effect on health". I actually thought this was going to be a big, big problem."
It was indeed in the news that 5 microsieverts/hour radiation was detected at Tokai-mura in Ibaraki Prefecture on March 15 morning, but hardly anyone, other than nuclear experts like him, connected that news with the elevated radiation level in Tokyo. The residents of Tokyo didn't even know about it. What happened in the morning of March 15? Well, Reactor 4 at Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant had a "big noise" which blew out the roof at 6AM, and Reactor 2 had an explosion in the Suppression Pool at 6:14AM. Or it could be from the Reactor 3 explosion in the previous day, at 11:01AM on March 14.
The professor goes on to explain his concern at that time:
"Why was I concerned? Because the current radiation injury prevention method is based on dealing with a small amount of radioactive materials that emit very high radiation. In this case, the total amount of radioactive materials is not much of an issue. What matters is how high the radiation is.
Then how much will it cost when you seriously do the decontamination
work?
In case of "Itai-Itai disease" caused by cadmium poisoning, to
decontaminate half of cadmium contaminated area of roughly 3,000 hectare,
the government has spent 800 billion yen so far. How much money will be
needed if we have to decontaminate the area 1,000 times as big?
"What happens then? The problem like the contaminated rice hay happens. The pattern of contamination does not follow concentric circles. It depends on the weather. It also depends on where the particles landed - on the material that absorbs water, for example."
What happens then? The problem like the contaminated rice hay happens. For example in Fujiwara-cho in Iwate Prefecture rice hay with 57,000 Bq/kg was found. Osaki in Miyagi Prefecture 17,000 Bq/kg. In Minami-Soma city in Fukushima Prefecture 106,000 Bq/kg, and in Shirakawa city in Fukushima 97,000 Bq/kg, and Iwate 64,000 Bq/kg.
The pattern of contamination does not follow concentric circles. It
depends on the weather. It also depends on where the particles landed -
on the material that absorbs water, for example.