It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Carseller4
Ron Paul has no chance.
Campaign is exploding (for the worse as we speak)
Never had more than 7-8% support, and much of his support is unable to vote for him in closed primaries.
Guy is toast.
Are you Ron Paul supporters happy that he is using campaign money to buy straw polls that mean absolutely nothing? He raises a lot of money and wastes it. Did the same thing in the 2008 elections.
Guy is a shoe-in for congressional races, but is in way over his head when it comes to running a Presidential campaign.
We have a choice: to vote for another corporate ho or to vote for the man who wants to end the fed, which is the source of all our pain. Could he do it? Well now that's a horse of a different color because so many people are still comfortable with their feudal slave status.
I love Ron Paul, but it seems like all one has to do these days is post a thread with RP in the title, a video, and automatically get like 100 stars and flags.
Originally posted by ShogunAssassins
What i find funny... Most of you are the same people complaining about Obama, our credit downgrade and our current situation..
Ron Paul wanted us to full default, that means downgrades by all creditors.. So you hate Obama for getting us downgraded by 1, love Ron Paul because he would get us downgraded by them all, and pretend this is logic?
The US has lost all credibility to decide whether or not Iran is actually getting nukes or not. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. I'll admit I actually figured Saddam did have WMDs. However, I won't be such a sucker as to think Iran is building WMDs. Get it?
Most of you are all antinuke, RP wants to let Iran have nuclear production.. And this is logic?
Another day in the twilight zone if you ask me.
much of his support is unable to vote for him in closed primaries.
Your entire premise here has to necessarily be rooted in the assumption that there is nothing that can be done in protecting our borders and keeping illegal immigration down to a sustainable minimum. Your argument implicitly demands that we accept total failure in protecting our borders as a given, while you expressly insist that people who have not been duly sworn or deputized act as law enforcement personnel in a hopeless attempt to clean up the mess that failure to protect the borders created. The federal government has been Constitutionally mandated to protect our nations borders and they consistently fail to do so, but here you are calling Ron Paul insane because he disagrees with government expanding their power in spite of their demonstrable inability to handle that power and attempting to legislatively criminalize business owners just because they can't do their job to begin with.
Further, NumbersUSA is a political action committee and the link provided demonstrates that they are unabashedly so. While they claim non-partisan politics, their ideas on immigration policies are clear, and very much the same as what I just described above. NumbersUSA has no seeming regard or concern for the federal government's failure to secure our borders, and instead seems intent on lobbying for legislation that would only further intrude into the privacy of individuals.
If you think this unseemly push to destroy privacy is sane, then it is understandable why you would see someone who remains consistent in their assertion that individual rights is really the only reason government should exist by criticizing "e-verify" legislation as being insane.
But what difference does it really make what affiliation someone has if they stand for what's right?
When was the last time an independent candidate made it to the white house anyway? To think we'll get one there in 2012 is simply wishful thinking and a waste of time.
Are you suggesting that I am a "mindless cult member"?
So the truth comes out. You're really just here to antagonize the people you don't like.
Just curious, are you a good example of a common "supporter" of the independent presidential candidate you are rooting for? If so I guess I might not be too fond of that candidate either.
Originally posted by EagleTalonZ
I get exhausted by hearing the same arguments against him over... and over... and over again.
"Ron Paul is TOO old!"
"Ron Paul is TOO crazy!"
"Ron Paul buys his votes!"
"Ron Paul wears a tinfoil hat!"
As for the not getting his brilliant ideas passed - it is very hard to do when he's the ONLY person in Congress who is actually for the people. Does that mean we shouldn't support him? No. On the contrary, we should do it just for the purpose of sending Washington D.C. a message that we're sick of them.
Originally posted by ShogunAssassins
What i find funny... Most of you are the same people complaining about Obama, our credit downgrade and our current situation..
Ron Paul wanted us to full default, that means downgrades by all creditors.. So you hate Obama for getting us downgraded by 1, love Ron Paul because he would get us downgraded by them all, and pretend this is logic? Most of you are all antinuke, RP wants to let Iran have nuclear production.. And this is logic?
Another day in the twilight zone if you ask me.
Originally posted by anumohi
Ron Paul has the worlds vote because everyone else is a RETARD