Can someone debunk this footage?

Watch

I know Urzi's name has been mentioned in the past, and people have questioned him, but I found this footage very impressive - particularly this segment where he zooms in and out to show the disc. What are your thoughts on this?

reply to post by Shino

reply to post by Domo1


Thanks. Check it out: 34mins into the video

interesting footage. i didnt watch all the film but surely other people have filmed these visits by the ufo? they have turned up so many times, there must be other corroborating video from neighbours? i noticed that all or most of the crafts are the same size and are appearing in the same place which makes it a bit suspect to me. at this moment im not sure about them. im sure these would have been discussed here on ATS

It's seems rather small and close to me- could it be held up with fishing line?

Also why does the film cut out before it zooms off at light speed? I'd say it's because that would have revealed the puppeteers.

reply to post by Planet teleX


Earlier in the documentary, you see that hes filming outside a window on the roof and cant view beyond that angle.

reply to post by Shino
Interesting...

What time in the video would that be?

Poor quality CGI.

You can see the "UFO" shaking with the camera in several spots just after the 34min mark.

It appears that the person who did this didn't know how to stabilize the image before pasting the UFO artefact.

It does look rather small, maybe rc?

I'm a believer but my spidey sense is telling me this is fake.

When I was watching the footage, I was thinking why are all these UFO videos so shaky. That questioned was answered when he demonstrated how he was recording it through a skylight window with his arm extended.

If he was standing outside with all that camera shake, I would be questioning it. After seeing how he was recording it, I think it could very well be a legitimate recording.

reply to post by Shino


At first I was mildly interested but when it just disappeared and the guy filming didn't bother to scan around the sky or even attempt to search the sky in any direction to see if he lost focus. Hanging out a window or not If it were me I would have moved the camera around trying to recapture the image.

To me this means staged HOAX

Here's a pretty good job of debunking. A button on the skylight.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

reply to post by Phage

It does look pretty much like a button on the skylight, but considering the glowing reviews for this UFO footage as the best of the best, it doesn't bode well for other UFO footage.

According to the youtube channel:

WINNER - International UFO Congress EBE Award - Best Authentic UFO Footage In A Documentary. Your about to see miraculous UFO footage that has been authenticated by top UFO researchers and annalists. More than 1700 UFO sightings have been filmed since the year 2000 by Antonio Urzi.

Best authentic footage? More than 1700 sightings?

Even Jamie Maussan is interviewed saying it's one of the best and it has similarities with Billy Meier's stuff (a known hoaxer, so for once Maussan is right, this hoax does have something in common with another prolific hoaxer!) And lastly, how does one person see 1700 UFOs in such a short time when others go a whole lifetime without seeing even one?

There's not just one but dozens of hoax alarms going off in this footage. So if this is the "best of the best" I guess that must mean other ufo footage is pretty bad.

i think that footage looks fairly legit. Only thing that really makes me question it is when he turns off the camera as its leaving and then switches it back on and its gone. i know i wouldnt turn off my camera, i would have been interested to see how it left as well

Originally posted by Shino
reply to post by Domo1

 

Thanks. Check it out: 34mins into the video

That looks very similar to what me and thousands of other residents of my hometown saw in broad daylight 30 years ago. Only it was much, much closer to us and the ground. Looks real enough to me...

Originally posted by OccamAssassin
Poor quality CGI.

You can see the "UFO" shaking with the camera in several spots just after the 34min mark.

It appears that the person who did this didn't know how to stabilize the image before pasting the UFO artefact.

Or simply that the camera was shaking (it was hand-held) therefore the UFO appears to 'shake' too. Nothing strange or suspect about that really. CGI? I don't think so somehow.

Originally posted by SLAYER69
reply to post by Shino

 

At first I was mildly interested but when it just disappeared and the guy filming didn't bother to scan around the sky or even attempt to search the sky in any direction to see if he lost focus. Hanging out a window or not If it were me I would have moved the camera around trying to recapture the image.

To me this means staged HOAX

edit on 16-9-2011 by SLAYER69 because: (no reason given)

I disagree. To me that means "short arms". If you can't physically continue to film the object because of basic physics, that doesn't mean 'fake' at all.

Originally posted by Phage
Here's a pretty good job of debunking. A button on the skylight.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

edit on 9/16/2011 by Phage because: (no reason given)

Yeah, I've seen that thread. I guess a button on the skylight is easier for some to deal with than the possibility of a large unknown craft. However, the button theory does not account for the video. Buttons don't move on their own, nor do they manage to move across clouds and buildings. Nice try by the original poster though..

I guess the answer to your question OP is this:

So far - no. No-one can debunk it at this point.

Originally posted by SLAYER69
reply to post by Shino

 

At first I was mildly interested but when it just disappeared and the guy filming didn't bother to scan around the sky or even attempt to search the sky in any direction to see if he lost focus. Hanging out a window or not If it were me I would have moved the camera around trying to recapture the image.

To me this means staged HOAX

edit on 16-9-2011 by SLAYER69 because: (no reason given)

He couldn't. It's physically impossible to follow the video outside the small angles he has. Look at this image below, he has a sloped roof. There is a small window at the top of this roof, he shoots out of it. As you can see, if anything passes over, you cant follow it. Watch the entire video to see this in reality