Question for Evolutionist's

reply to post by Siddharta


Evilution is a creation of Satan not a creation of YHWH.

If you support it, you are not one of God's flock.

It is pure evil.

EGADS! i'm gonna freak out now and not watch any pro-evolution videos! i MIGHT give them attention! eek eek somebody i disagree with might actually have one more meaningless view on their youtube video. don't want people to formulate their own opinions on subjects, gotta FORCE 'EM TO SEE it my way by trying to stifle what they have to say in disagreement! yes, that's the way it should be!

reply to post by undo


Nice avatar do you honestly believe stargates are real?

Just curious.

I will NEVER watch that video again!



or THIS one.


oh i'm furious.

Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
reply to post by undo

 

Nice avatar do you honestly believe stargates are real?

Just curious.

edit on 16-9-2011 by RevelationGeneration because: (no reason given)

yep, i honestly do. but that's not what this thread is about.

don't sidetrack me, i'm on the war path.

reply to post by undo


Likewise, i'm on the warpath to destroy the deceptive cult of evilution.

People keep coming to this thread thinking they can give me an answer to the question in my original post.

So far not one person has been successful in that quest.

Evilutionist's are so full of pride they just can't admit the fact that there is NO observable or testable evidence to support evolution and its never been witnessed in practice.

Pure Faith, Pure Deception.

reply to post by RevelationGeneration


How old do you consider the earth to be? At what point in History did god begin his creation. If you truly follow your scripture, you should believe the earth was created as is told in the bible?

Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
reply to post by Akasirus

 

Sorry but "unprove" is not even a real word. When your going to use English get back to me.

When YOU'RE going to use English get back to ME....

Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
reply to post by undo

 

Likewise, i'm on the warpath to destroy the deceptive cult of evilution.

i don't think destroying knowledge (even inaccurate knowledge) is useful. attempting to disprove those parts you find incorrect, now this would be a noble undertaking and armed with at least a bit more knowledge than the higher critics had at their disposal, 300 years ago.

i mean, that's what scientists do to each other! they are constantly learning and trying to disprove bits and pieces of each other's data. an exclusive club no doubt, but at least they aren't so cemented in that you can't reason with them at any level whatsoever. you might make some inroads if you only apply your efforts to one part of it. it's a big topic, although i doubt it'll be any easier than it was for galileo. thankfully, they don't throw people in prison now for disagreeing with evolution. ..at least, not yet. although some guy's youtube video just got jail time.

reply to post by woodwardjnr


Yes that's correct I believe the biblical view of the world and man kind being under 10,000 years old probably closer to 6000. With a global flood occurring 4,500 years ago.

Originally posted by RevelationGeneration

edit on 16-9-2011 by RevelationGeneration because: (no reason given)

this guy is a joke
i love how when christians try to make a point it 'we think this and they think this'
when atheists make a point its 'well this is what the evidence shows us'

reply to post by UniverSoul


are you SURE all "christians" do that ? you have researched this enough to have a good representative sample? empircal evidence, i hope?

reply to post by undo

haha well not all
but you can tell a lot by someones demina
if you look like you have something to prove well your probably trying to convince yourself not others

Originally posted by UniverSoul
reply to post by undo

 

haha well not all
but you can tell a lot by someones demina
if you look like you have something to prove well your probably trying to convince yourself not others

well since i've caught you in a light hearted mood, would you mind terribly answering a question for me (i mean, to the best of your ability)? the question is: if science requires empirical process, is there any point at which the process can be skipped during the accumulation of data for testing?

You will appreciate this OP its a... your favorite form of evidence a youtube video


pubs.usgs.gov...

reply to post by RevelationGeneration

Yes that's correct I believe the biblical view of the world and man kind being under 10,000 years old probably closer to 6000. With a global flood occurring 4,500 years ago.

Wait a minute now.

In your haste you have once again contradicted yourself.

Look below at the video title in your next post. "Earth is 6,000 years old"

It doesn't say mankind is 6,000 years old it says Earth

So which one is it that's 6,000 years old ?? Man or Earth ? I suppose you believe Earth is only a few days older than man right?

reply to post by undo


According to that video by featuring dawkins im "insane"... and im one of the one's that didn't have a religious upbringing...

reply to post by MathiasAndrew

So which one is it that's 6,000 years old ?? Man or Earth ? I suppose you believe Earth is only a few days older than man right?

Yes on the 6th day, although we have to remember that there was a flood 4500 years ago that killed everyone accept noah and his family and that's when the human race was re-populated..

Originally posted by undo

Originally posted by UniverSoul
reply to post by undo

 

haha well not all
but you can tell a lot by someones demina
if you look like you have something to prove well your probably trying to convince yourself not others

well since i've caught you in a light hearted mood, would you mind terribly answering a question for me (i mean, to the best of your ability)? the question is: if science requires empirical process, is there any point at which the process can be skipped during the accumulation of data for testing?

some things require testing to learn, but once we test and get an answer it becomes logical and evidential
some things are already logical and can be seen all around us without need to test anything