It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by RizeorDie
back on topic, I think there is something fishy about elenin, maybe not the comet itself but every alignment we have a major earthquake. since japan until now we havent seen anything over 7 mag. only a few day...
Actually, there were no alignments on the dates of the quakes. The claimants faked the data.
Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by kwell
For one they were on average 5 degrees away from making a straight line. Second, at that time Elenin was below the ecliptic making it impossible for an alignment to occur. And third the Orbit Diagram doesn't even give you an accurate simulation. It says it right on there. If you use the Horizons system you will see clearly that no alignments occurred when people claim they did.
Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by kwell
Are we going to play the game where any earthquake that occurs on that day is attributed to Elenin or are we going to play the one where any 6.0+ earthquake that occurs within a week of the "alignment" is attributed to Elenin? Since you are so sure that something is going to happen that day what is your prediction for what will occur? I just want to try to prevent some of the moving of the goalposts that is almost definitely going to occur.
I wouldn't think you would stoop to slander instead of adressing the facts. Facts are facts, homie, regardless of the source.
And, I hate to tell you this but man made dating methods are in error in excess of billions of years
Go to the NASA site..... ssd.jpl.nasa.gov... type in these dates of the earthquakes 2-27-10 Chile, 9-4-10 New Zealand, 3-11-11 Japan . They are either right on alignments or very close. I think its just NASA making it align and them hitting us with HAARP. How do people keep saying there was no alignment. It's right there.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by Theophoros
Yes, the alignment-quake data was faked. The faking was done by changing the alignment dates to match a selected quake. I checked and that is how I found out that the data was faked. Did you check yourself or did you simply get sucked into this hoax?
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by Lemon.Fresh
Yes the claimants did fake the data. The best alignments did not happen on the dates they claimed. The claimants picked dates based on the events they ascribed to the alignments instead of the alignments themselves. That is called faking the data.
I have posted the NASA JPL site above....check for yourself. I have checked many, many, many, many times. What the heck. The information is right in front of you and everyone else. Please check it yourself and stop saying that they faked it when anyone in the world can check it for themselves. Maybe your just trying to annoy.
Originally posted by Lil Drummerboy
the planet Nibirubrownwhiteblackhole is causing the REAL issuesedit on 15-9-2011 by Lil Drummerboy because: (no reason given)