It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by XplanetX
In the first video it is clear that they cannot see it with their naked eye, "he says the sun is too bright to see it"
I have a serious question:
Do these camera's have a small infrared function?
Can they see in the infrared spectrum?
edit on 12-9-2011 by XplanetX because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by xxspockyxx
I wonder if there is anyone else out there that thinks that debunkers may just be working for an orginization that does not want us to learn what is real and what is not? I will point out certain other posts like some above mine that show up within seconds of an original post and claim "lens flair" and opticle issues have to be what we are witnessing. Does any one else here wish that they got paid a certain amount of cash for hanging out at a website and telling other people that they are dumb for questioning the "official" story on something.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/f41c6f35b119.jpg[/atsimg]
This Week's Sky at a Glance
Some daily events in the changing sky for September 2 – 10
by Alan M. MacRobert
www.skyandtelescope.com...
Originally posted by xxspockyxx
I wonder if there is anyone else out there that thinks that debunkers may just be working for an orginization that does not want us to learn what is real and what is not? I will point out certain other posts like some above mine that show up within seconds of an original post and claim "lens flair" and opticle issues have to be what we are witnessing. Does any one else here wish that they got paid a certain amount of cash for hanging out at a website and telling other people that they are dumb for questioning the "official" story on something.
Originally posted by xxspockyxx
I wonder if there is anyone else out there that thinks that debunkers may just be working for an orginization that does not want us to learn what is real and what is not? I will point out certain other posts like some above mine that show up within seconds of an original post and claim "lens flair" and opticle issues have to be what we are witnessing. Does any one else here wish that they got paid a certain amount of cash for hanging out at a website and telling other people that they are dumb for questioning the "official" story on something.
Originally posted by Aliensun
Originally posted by xxspockyxx
I wonder if there is anyone else out there that thinks that debunkers may just be working for an orginization that does not want us to learn what is real and what is not? I will point out certain other posts like some above mine that show up within seconds of an original post and claim "lens flair" and opticle issues have to be what we are witnessing. Does any one else here wish that they got paid a certain amount of cash for hanging out at a website and telling other people that they are dumb for questioning the "official" story on something.
You know, the first thing you need to do is to recognize how idiotic the OP is. What information did it convey? Was there anything in the OP that could help or credibility to what they were seeing such as where, when, how long of a duration, did it move or change shape, was it rotating with the sky,, was it there when they first saw it, or did it appear at a place where it wasn't a second before?
Nothing of substance, and you complain about others that complain. Isn't that ironic?
Originally posted by Phage
Something like this:
From this thread:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by Phage
Something like this:
From this thread:
www.abovetopsecret.com...