It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sonofliberty1776
Roughly 3000 innocent people were killed in a couple of hours. Where did this happen in Afghanistan or Iraq? They were killed in a dastardly terrorist attack(whoever actually did it). Innocent men and women in a city and country that were "at peace". We have every right to mourn their passing.
Originally posted by sonofliberty1776
The OP's title more than suggests that they should not be mourned. Then there is this travesty of a line.....
Originally posted by Kryties
reply to post by sonofliberty1776
Nobody is saying we don't mourn those 2996 people killed that day, only that many tend to forget the other 116000 innocent civilians killed as a result.
I wonder if the op is man enough to go to New York and actually say that.
IMO 9/11 should be a day of shame rather than mourning.
Originally posted by GeorgiaGirl
Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
reply to post by GeorgiaGirl
But.... Is there more reason to mourn these 3000 more than the more than 100.000 Afghanis? They are just as innocent victims of 9/11 as those 3000.
You asked, "Why do we mourn the victims of 9/11".
No one is suggesting that ANY innocent person's death is not tragic. If 100,000 innocent Afghan civilians were killed, then that is also tragic. I do not believe that the United States is responsible for all 100,000 deaths, however. If we were not there at all, I wonder how many would have died. Of course, we can never know. Maybe, just maybe, we have PREVENTED more deaths by being there? It's all speculation.
Personally, I would like to see our troops come home. Enough is enough.
But you are not so naive that you can't understand that this is the ANNIVERSARY of the death of 3,000 people who died in one massive event. Obviously that is going to be significant, and a news story.
Originally posted by tom1701
The OP hasn't a clue.....
Maybe we'll stop killing them when they stand up and tell their own people to stop the acts of terrorism. I will not shed one tear for any of those who were justifiably killed in any middle eastern country...
The only problem is we should have nuke'd them on 9/13.....and did away with a couple of million of them....
On 9/13 we did not know who to nuke. So, I disagree there. However, I might have agreed with dropping a neutron bomb on mecca, or qom. Followed by the warning that ANY OTHER TERROR ATTACK would be followed by a full out nuclear strike on mecca and the tearing down of the dome of the rock so that the Israelis could rebuild their temple. I dislike halfhearted wars. If we are going to have a war, then let's do it. These police actions accomplish nothing and never have. I offer Korea, Vietnam, the Balkans, Somalia, Iraq, and Afghanistan as evidence. IMO, the neutron strike would have delivered the message that we are not pussy footing around and will not stand for anymore BS. The path we have chosen has had the opposite effect. We see where that has gotten us.
Originally posted by tom1701
The OP hasn't a clue.....
Maybe we'll stop killing them when they stand up and tell their own people to stop the acts of terrorism. I will not shed one tear for any of those who were justifiably killed in any middle eastern country...
The only problem is we should have nuke'd them on 9/13.....and did away with a couple of million of them....
Originally posted by sonofliberty1776
BUT a serious message would have been set