It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by okamitengu
links failed ):
Originally posted by JiggyPotamus
At least this is in the highly speculative forum. Geez, just because someone doesn't look or act like everyone else doesn't mean they are a reptilian. I have to give it to you though, because most of these threads contain nothing but normal everyday pixelation, and at least you took the time to post images instead of linking a Youtube video like everyone else. So on that end, great job.
But on the other hand, I don't buy it. People do file their teeth, and this is something this person could have done as well. We would have to explore, scientifically, all other possible (terrestrial) explanations before jumping to the conclusion that this man is in fact a member of a race of species that has yet to be proven to even exist, let alone showing up on earth.
So I am not knocking you for your beliefs, but I would stake my reputation, online reputation that is, lol, that there is a completely terrestrial explanation for this guys weird mouth and chompers. Maybe they're false teeth, and he thought it would be cool to file them down. Or maybe they came that way...I don't know, but I bet if we asked him he could clear this up quickly.
Originally posted by bartholomeo
Good catch man!! That guy is definitely a reptilian; picture 13 of the unedited ones gives him away. The homo sapiens retina does not look like this guys retina on picture 13. He is a reptilian or a mix of reptilian and homo sapiens, but not pure homo sapiens.
Again you seem to see the forest for the trees, congrats!
It is to be expected that the grand majority of the population doesn't have a good perception of things, and therefore cannot recognize a reptilian from a homo sapiens, to them they both have long extremities and a small head, so they think they are the same.edit on 10-9-2011 by bartholomeo because: (no reason given)