It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by EmilNomel
even after the massive cover ups that the government did by destroying the physical evidences and shipping all of the rubble to china for recycling
Originally posted by spoor
Originally posted by EmilNomel
even after the massive cover ups that the government did by destroying the physical evidences and shipping all of the rubble to china for recycling
What makes you make that silly claim? Which conspiracy theory site did you get that from?
Originally posted by Saltarello
Ok, so taking all the rubble from a crime scene, and having it shipped to china in VERY short notice is normal right?
Originally posted by AskWhy11
Sooooo, what you're saying, is that all the evidence wasn't touched, it was left there, and that there was a forensic investigation that did take place regarding the steal beams and materials?
Originally posted by AskWhy11
I would love to see it. As well as others.
Originally posted by spoor
Originally posted by AskWhy11
I would love to see it. As well as others.
So you have never heard of Fresh Kills!
Originally posted by AskWhy11
Originally posted by pteridine
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by pteridine
I'd like to discuss the evidence but there doesn't seem to be any.
You forgot to add "in my opinion" to your post above. There are thousands of others that do see and agree with the evidence. Just because you would rather deny the existence of the evidence, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
Where is it? Hard evidence, that is, not just hearsay and speculation.
The evidence is overwhelming. Disinfo agent?
I mean you have to be to make such ignorant statements. What more evidence could you ask for?
Originally posted by EmilNomel
Originally posted by pteridine
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by pteridine
I'd like to discuss the evidence but there doesn't seem to be any.
You forgot to add "in my opinion" to your post above. There are thousands of others that do see and agree with the evidence. Just because you would rather deny the existence of the evidence, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
Where is it? Hard evidence, that is, not just hearsay and speculation.
i am not an expert in structure engineering, demolition, chemistry, physics, etc... but, all the experts in those fields have many evidences, even after the massive cover ups that the government did by destroying the physical evidences and shipping all of the rubble to china for recycling etc...
but, i am an expert of common sense... and if common sense was so common then why so many people like you don't have it? after all, it should be "common"
one day after 9/11 the perfectly unscathed passport of Satam Al Suqami, one of the alleged 19 hijackers, was found several blocks from Ground Zero, even though its next to impossible such a flimsy item escaped the towering inferno unblemished... however, that is your only "hard evidence" that you have! right? LOL get real
Originally posted by pteridine
The OP did not post a link to a free video. If you are not near a screening, it is $5.95. I will look on youtube and see if it is there.
Originally posted by pteridine
I ask for actual physical evidence.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by pteridine
The OP did not post a link to a free video. If you are not near a screening, it is $5.95. I will look on youtube and see if it is there.
Already did that. If the OP had looked just a little more, he would've found it here:
Originally posted by pteridine
Originally posted by Cassius666
Is that all you got? In that case its 5.95 against 24 Trillion so far.
I am suggesting that Gage and his fellows are perpetuating the CT's only to profit from the gullible. It's $5.95 x number of suckers for Gage and his company. I will say that as entertainment, it's much less expensive than pro sports or first run movies but may still not be worth it. I'll wait for the reviews.
Originally posted by pteridine
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by pteridine
I'd like to discuss the evidence but there doesn't seem to be any.
You forgot to add "in my opinion" to your post above. There are thousands of others that do see and agree with the evidence. Just because you would rather deny the existence of the evidence, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
Where is it? Hard evidence, that is, not just hearsay and speculation.
Originally posted by pteridine
You must be easily overwhelmed. As to "what more evidence" I could ask for, I ask for actual physical evidence. Some evidence that wasn't imaginary would be nice. Evidence that did not count on the incredulity of the presenter when questioned. Evidence that was more than people saying that it "just didn't look right" and "buildings don't fall that way."edit on 9/10/2011 by pteridine because: (no reason given)