It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by quedup
reply to post by captiva
They rely on our confusion - which leads to inaction to be able to carry out their agenda!
Just as long as we keep putting the pennies in the bank and keep running their businesses until they get in their shelters. Just as long as the masses don't catch on and turn into a lynch mob before they hit those bunkers.
Yes they love confusion - it stops decisions being made!
They have all the black budget money and supposedly the worlds top scientific brains poured into Nasa and the likes and they know exactly what is coming - Satalite my Backside! That just buys them those last few hours to head for the bunkers.
Originally posted by iNkGeEk
reply to post by Theophoros
another fact....
Deep Impact was a movie based on a fictitious yet plausible story. It's not a documentary.
Originally posted by greenCo
Originally posted by chr0naut
reply to post by Theophoros
Latest science says it does appear to have broken up. Even its discoverer Leon Elenin has commented on its break up.
Because the pieces are in the vacuum of space and the forces upon the comet are unchanged, they are not, essentially, changing direction, slowing down, speeding up or anything similar. The comet is just becoming softer and fuzzier as moves on its original orbital trajectory.
Not at all.
Velocity = mass * acceleration... so less mass because is breaking up, then less velocity. Simple physics.
Originally posted by chr0naut
reply to post by greenCo
You are absolutely right about velocity equaling mass times acceleration.
When you break something up, all the pieces have the same total mass as the original object. This is true for a comet moving through space.
As there is no change in mass.
There is no significant change in velocity.
There may be a tiny change due to the greater area of interaction with the solar wind due to the increase in area facing the Sun, but this is trivial as there was already an interaction with the solar wind before the break up.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
On Dec 1st, I am going to track down every Elenin doomsayer, go to their house, and personally slap them .
Just saying...
-gets his slappin glove ready-
Originally posted by Theophoros
Originally posted by SaturnFX
On Dec 1st, I am going to track down every Elenin doomsayer, go to their house, and personally slap them .
Just saying...
-gets his slappin glove ready-
Slap this :
Originally posted by captiva
reply to post by SaturnFX
Always imagine the unimagineable. Could we ever have imagined 9/11 prior to the event or could we ever have imagined being in Iraq after so many years and knowing we went there based on lies.
respects
Correct, however, as stated, there is indication that, in fact, it has significantly changed velocity and, when that is calculated out it puts it right in our ball park, literally.
Originally posted by captiva
The difference between you and I is that I will be prepared and hopefully my preparation will have been for nothing. You will not, whether its for nothing or not.
respects
Originally posted by chr0naut
reply to post by greenCo
You are absolutely right about velocity equaling mass times acceleration.
When you break something up, all the pieces have the same total mass as the original object. This is true for a comet moving through space.
As there is no change in mass.
There is no significant change in velocity.
There may be a tiny change due to the greater area of interaction with the solar wind due to the increase in area facing the Sun, but this is trivial as there was already an interaction with the solar wind before the break up.