9/11 survivor censored by media

Some more support for controlled demolition theory here. This man, William Rodriguez, helped many people survive during 9/11, but was apparently censored by the media, because he heard large explosions immediately *before* the planes hit the towers. This interview is from RTAmerica.

This censorship from the media no longer comes as a surprise. This reminds me of the story of the two suspects arrested at the George Washington bridge driving trucks with planes painted on them; a story that disappeared from the news permanently.

Do you think it's a coincidence all this new information is beginning to come to light? Especially considering the 10th anniversary of 9-11 is approaching. Why are people waiting to come out with this information now? Where have they been the last decade?

reply to post by petrus4

William Rodriguez's story has been in the media many times, from his first statement on September 12, 2001, through his ill-advised lawsuit against the entire Bush family and most of the executive branch, and at various other times. It's a bit of a procrustean fish story, though, and changes for different audiences. This does a good job of collating the different versions.

reply to post by petrus4


Censored? BY WHO??? I watched him on CSpan a few months ago for crying out loud. Of course, I have lost track of how many times he has changed his story. BTW, his first story, told on the afternoon of 9/11 included absolutely NOTHING about hearing explosions prior to the impacts. Nada, nothing, zilch

Originally posted by FurvusRexCaeli

One of Rodriguez' claims that is asserted to be false, from those links, was the claim that no previous steel frame building had ever fallen due to fire. Rodriguez was AFAIK not the only individual to make that claim, and I've never seen any evidence to suggest that it was, in fact, false.

On Googling the claim, I was led here, (www.debunking911.com...) which goes into the theory that the beams were sufficiently weakened by fire from the jet fuel, that the entire building collapsed. That site issues a challenge to conspiracy theorists, to find a building not destroyed by fire, that had supposedly had its' support beams weakened by fire for six hours.

None of the towers had their support beams weakened for six hours. The collapse didn't take six hours.

Many of Rodriguez' claims could well be false; or at least falsifiable. It's true that, although the media can be said to exploit or promote Islamophobia to a degree, they have not sought the outright criminalisation of Islam at all. I do not, however, believe that the single above claim was false, at least according to what I have been able to find.

reply to post by vipertech0596

Censored? BY WHO??? I watched him on CSpan a few months ago for crying out loud. Of course, I have lost track of how many times he has changed his story. BTW, his first story, told on the afternoon of 9/11 included absolutely NOTHING about hearing explosions prior to the impacts. Nada, nothing, zilch

So with the anniversary of 9/11 coming up, MSM outlets can inject people with fear by giving them the idea that another terrorist attack might be underway, but they can't air even a single story about firefighters who were at the sight and heard explosions before the collapse? Of course not, the corporate media wouldn't air any anti-establishment stories like that, unless of course they would be mocking, ridiculing, or just all out insulting conspiracy theorists who question the official story of events.

Also, where are all of the stories about the thousands of people who have developed some sort of respiratory problems due to the dust?

And CSPAN? Are you kidding? Who sits down and says "Gee that was a long day, time to relax and watch some CSPAN." ? I'll bet no more than a couple hundred people saw that in depth CSPAN coverage.

This post is not pertaining to the OP however it does have to do with media censorship.

I remember on 9/11 one of the first things that really stuck out that day was a call I heard on MSNBC. A lady stated that her child attended a school not to far from the WTC. One of her classmates was staring out the window at the towers and her teacher asked her to pay attention, the girl continued to look out the window and when the teacher asked her what was so interesting she said something to the effect that she wanted to look at the towers as much as she could because her father told her that they were not going to be there in a weeks time. Supposedly they tracked the girls father down and questioned him, he was told not to leave the country and low and behold when they came back for a second round of interviews the man had abandoned his family and went back to the middle east.

I know this is off topic to an extent but I thought it was odd how such an interesting story was all but swept away. Even the follow up part I stated earlier I saw in a book and I was wondering if anyone had any info about this particular story.

Thanks and sorry to the OP if you feel that this post disrupted your thread.

Trowa

It is obvious that more and more people are beginning to reject the official 9/11 story.

Hence the TPTB are probably planning another false flag attack sometime soon (not necessarily on 9/11) to reignite the flame.

reply to post by TrowaBarton



I recall this "story" as well. It was a Pakistani boy who was quoted on September 6th 2001 as saying "the towers would not be there next week". His teacher reported what this young man said to her superior on the 13th of September. As I understand it the student attended New Utrecht High School in Bensonhurst, Brooklyn. It is said that the FBI did investigate but there really was nothing to go on.

Just wanted to clear up the "facts". Sorry to have gone off topic.

If we recall, William Rodriguez' testimony to the 911 commission was never included in the report.

Why one might ask, why would one of the last living survivors of the WTC collapse NOT have his testimony acknowledged ?

AND included in the "Official Story" ?

One word...."Explosions".

That could categorically speaking, be considered a form of Censorship.


[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/cb02341f1b89.jpg[/atsimg]

Isnt that footage of the guy censored by the media on a news outlet?

reply to post by TupacShakur

Also, where are all of the stories about the thousands of people who have developed some sort of respiratory problems due to the dust?

Uh, here's one:

sanjayguptamd.blogs.cnn.com...

That's just one. Almost every major print and electriconic media has had stories about it. There was a major debate in Congress, etc. Why would you ask something like that?

The best way to control the opposition is to lead it.

Willy's story doesn't add up, and in fact, helps to support the OS. He is controlled opposition.

William Rodriguez is a Fraud

How to Spot a Fake Leader

Originally posted by Cassius666
Isnt that footage of the guy censored by the media on a news outlet?

yeah but it's not "mainstream" media. You know - not "credible" according to ATS arguments.

reply to post by hooper


Because it has taken 10 YEARS for them to finally BEGIN to acknowledge these people's incredible suffering ??

Originally posted by GrinchNoMore
reply to post by hooper

 

Because it has taken 10 YEARS for them to finally BEGIN to acknowledge these people's incredible suffering ??

Actually, this subject has been in the mainstream media for years. I don't know where you've been.

reply to post by hooper


It has been in the media indeed...but only as a story of how loony those dam fool conspiracy firefighters and first-responders are as to why they are all sick and dying.

Man one of my best buddies fathers went from Canada here to help on the pile, I AM WATCHING HIM DIE a horrible death.

And man he is STILL scared to talk of what he saw, and went on all around the area, they stayed for a month and ALL of them are sick ,, half of them TERMINAL....

And only those of the firehouse that went to New York are sick,, golly what a coincidence.

reply to post by GrinchNoMore


I wouldn't doubt a part of a bomb containing an anthrax of some sort. It wouldn't surprise me, they've paid everyone else to talk, leaving out certain details; if you don't know what i'm saying.

reply to post by GrinchNoMore

It has been in the media indeed...but only as a story of how loony those dam fool conspiracy firefighters and first-responders are as to why they are all sick and dying.

Well, I don't know what media you listen to but the "mainstream media" in the US is not calling the first responders and workers conspiracy nuts.

Man one of my best buddies fathers went from Canada here to help on the pile, I AM WATCHING HIM DIE a horrible death.

Thats a pity.

And man he is STILL scared to talk of what he saw, and went on all around the area, they stayed for a month and ALL of them are sick ,, half of them TERMINAL....

Well, some of them are sick but I certainly don't think half of them are "terminal" in the immeadiate sense.

And only those of the firehouse that went to New York are sick,, golly what a coincidence.

I really don't understand what you mean. There are folks from all different walks of life that are sick.

Within weeks of 9/11 I was beginning to disbelieve the official explanation, however in the last few years I have swung very much in the opposite direction. I can now see an astonishing amount of hearsay, "I recall that " (aye right!!!), suppressed this and that (yet available on Youtube (aye right !!). People changing their story and yet the one that gets remembered is the one that matches the conspiracy. How freaking convenient.

Now we have Anthrax included in the mix because of the respiratory problems. What the hell do you expect when a pile of concrete becomes rubble. Nice fresh air. Perfect chemical free dust. Guess what respiratory problems are found in lots of people who have worked in industrial dusty atmospheres. DUH!!!

Official explanations are weak because GUESS WHAT !!! they are clueless. The idea that people in certain positions have this magical ability to know everything as part of some giant global intellectual well guarded NWO is just utter nonsense. However, the last thing they can do is stand up and state "We have no idea how these people managed to orchestrate such an attack, we have no idea how many are still hiding, we do not know where the leaders are, we do not know where the next attack will be". That would be the truth but it does not inspire confidence so you get a ton of B.S. surprise surprise. As we all know B.S. is inconsistent and this leads the gullible to shout "conspiracy!".

Our leaders are people, people are fallible but they tend to have the gift of the gab.