It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
please enlighten us as to how this is 'different' ? i didn't follow her spending of her stipulation, can't say what she used it on, for or with but i do know she obtained it ILLEGALLY.
If you want to regulate people's lifestyle choices then why stop at drugs? What about fizzy drinks, fast food, candy, lack of exercise, cigarettes, alcohol, watching too much TV, video games, internet addiction, gambling?
So really what this is, is about a governor who profits on tax payer dollars to deny government assistance to pot smokers, whilst pleasing immensely that segment of the population that is so powerless that the only way they can gain a sense of self-worth is to think they are sticking it to some scum making lifestyle choices that they don't agree with.
How someone ended up in the situation they are in is not your right to judge. Quit behaving like your whole paycheck is just going to some imaginary welfare queen living some grand life, high on "drugs". That's a ridiculous, destructive and hateful fallacy that you need to snap out of. Realize you are getting played by the big boys, not the people just struggling to survive.
Are you implying that welfare is a civil right? Wow, just wow... As far as testing every applicant, that's ridiculous. Each case has a case worker, just up their judgement. Most people know when they are being scammed, it doesn't take a genius to know when you're talking to someone who is strung out.
You're right, no person is obliged to incriminate themselves, just like no person is obliged to take government assistance. When you start asking uncle Sam to pay for your lifestyle, you give him the authority to tell you how to live. Your parents had the authority to tell you not to do drugs as a teenager because they supported you, the same rules apply. But don't worry, it will never become standard practice.
You people who trash the 4th amendment and think your way of life is better than someone else's have a lot to learn.
I've been on both sides of this debate. I currently work for public assistance, and in the past I supplied people with "medicine". Folks....people on welfare do not buy drugs! That is a terrible lie. People who buy drugs have jobs or are dealers themselves. Welfare recepients who get drugs get them for free from their boy/girl friends. And these are people who use weed. Crackheads do not even apply for welfare! In my 7 years working here, I haven't met ONE crackhead in my office or building! They simply don't have the tenacity to participate in the program, because as of 1996 ANYONE receiving cash assistance HAS to volunteer from 82-130 community service hours. Crackheads aren't willing to do this. Also, they rarely have custody of their children, a requirement for receiving the assistance. Stop all the lying....
If they are filing jointly for the family, dad fails, then mom qualifies and begins collecting for the family, fine! No problems. However, if mom fails also, sucks for you. Hopefully at that point DHR would come for the children.
Originally posted by TomServo
reply to post by DZAG Wright
I've been on both sides of this debate. I currently work for public assistance, and in the past I supplied people with "medicine". Folks....people on welfare do not buy drugs! That is a terrible lie. People who buy drugs have jobs or are dealers themselves. Welfare recepients who get drugs get them for free from their boy/girl friends. And these are people who use weed. Crackheads do not even apply for welfare! In my 7 years working here, I haven't met ONE crackhead in my office or building! They simply don't have the tenacity to participate in the program, because as of 1996 ANYONE receiving cash assistance HAS to volunteer from 82-130 community service hours. Crackheads aren't willing to do this. Also, they rarely have custody of their children, a requirement for receiving the assistance. Stop all the lying....
I am genuinely encouraged by the information you have provided here! However, can you be certain that your neighborhood is not an exception to the rule? Do you live in a rural area? Is the 82-130 hrs community service a state rule, or federal? If not federal, what is the range of community service stipulations across the board? You also supported a thought i expressed in a previous comment:
If they are filing jointly for the family, dad fails, then mom qualifies and begins collecting for the family, fine! No problems. However, if mom fails also, sucks for you. Hopefully at that point DHR would come for the children.
Btw... who is lying and what lies are they telling?
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
So you're okay with the government egregiously violating the 4th because why? The victims are undesirables? Or wait, a kind of grade school reasoning about how you take one so someone else should?
So much for the love of freedom.
Originally posted by marinesniper0317
reply to post by traditionaldrummer
Are you out of your damn mind, I do not serve in the US.Marine Corp as a Sniper risking my life so some lazy piece of crap can collect welfare on my tax dime and do drugs. I fight and serve for the hard working American's that are trying to make it under tough conditions and keep fighting to work and survive not so they can collect a free hand out and get high.
You and the rest should give your entire paycheck to these drug users you Love so much...wait many of you sympathizers are probably pot smoking welfare recipients as well...
We should take all of you and send you to Singapore and see how long you last...
sniper
#1) Rick Scott's wife owns a large amount of stocks of the company that makes the urine tests.
#2) Rick Scott supposedly did this to save tax payers money. That was his lie.
#3) A whopping 2% of recipients actually failed the test.
Originally posted by PrimePorkchop
reply to post by mudbeed
#1) Rick Scott's wife owns a large amount of stocks of the company that makes the urine tests.
#2) Rick Scott supposedly did this to save tax payers money. That was his lie.
#3) A whopping 2% of recipients actually failed the test.
Nah, screw the tax payers, right? As long as you can feel like you accomplished something right before you fall asleep.
Originally posted by PrimePorkchop
I'm for it because if someone has the money to buy a bag of reefer, or an 8ball from their dealer, then why the hell should I be paying for the groceries?
Originally posted by SpaDe_
I found this interesting for all those saying they are just targeting welfare recipients.
Under the law, which went into effect on Friday, the Florida Department of Children and Family Services will be required to conduct the drug tests on adults applying to the federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program. The aid recipients would be responsible for the cost of the screening, which they would recoup in their assistance if they qualify. Those who fail the required drug testing may designate another individual to receive the benefits on behalf of their children. Shortly after the bill was signed, five Democrats from the state's congressional delegation issued a joint statement attacking the legislation, one calling it "downright unconstitutional." And the ACLU has filed suit against the state for requiring all state workers to take a drug test and is considering suing the state for drug-testing welfare applicants.
CNN
So, they are at the very least practicing what they preach. Now what do the people have to say that were saying they were just targeting the poor?