UFO Triangle Hovering Moscow September 07, 2011

Originally posted by Manhater

Originally posted by JibbyJedi

tpg65 ---

Never saw it like this before! Is it normal to see that pattern in a light source (the circular one not my cell's LCD)?
That is the back corner tail light of a TR-3B, or whatever looks exactly like this, which was kind of my perspective of it too...

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/50e4572ce209.jpg[/atsimg]

reply to post by JibbyJedi


That photo of the Belgian triangular "craft" is a bad example to use. The guy who took it has admitted it was a hoax.

The UFOs come from the TPTB, it's official. Which I guess is the masons and the Illuminati? Look at the snake coil formation.

reply to post by torsion


I wish I had more choices to use for examples. I didn't see any connecting lines to the corner lights like the example, and the center light to me looked like ball lightning plasma, not a steady light at all. The corner lights alternated colors when it slowed down, I saw red, blue, green, yellow, and the center was mostly a white sparkly lightning display.
Felt like I was in a Speilberg movie in real life. I am going to bust my arse this weekend to extract the other pic.

Only had time to snap 2 shots of it, 1st pic was it over the trees near the highway I was on, a bit jumpy too as I was not steady, I was about to wet myself. The 2nd pic is all I can find of it right now.

reply to post by JibbyJedi


That's not your LCD. the one below that object is your LCD. that has mass. The LCD spot is just right below it and to the right of the circle. That's another object. I believe. I don't care what anyone else says.

If the hot spots are showing up in that object, that has mass. and it's color coded to it's mass, the.blue is inside of what ever you took a picture of , the bright ball is inside the ball with it's outer layers of different hot spots.

Red - meaning the hottest, yellow... and so forth.

reply to post by Manhater


The center light of the craft should be right around where my LCD was reflecting off the windshield, I had to tilt the cam up to try to get the belly of this thing before it passed. I was extremely disappointed when I got home and uploaded them
.
If I can get a hold of a good drive recovery program I may be able to get the erased photo off that cell phone when I plug it into my USB on my cpu.

I tried using a crappy one and all I could pull up was the picture's filename, I was hoping a better program could pull whatever data from it. My 2 hard drives it's on sound like bad car starters trying to turn over, it takes 10 mins to just access them via slave drives.

Edit: I saved the photo onto those drives and used it as my desktop background image on one of them. It takes a long time to get onto those drives and I usually have to type in the directory manually if I want to get to something on them.... my ? is, where is the exact directory location of a desktop background image on a C drive using Windows XP?

The blue spot in this image is your LCD, could be some sort of reflection because of the light. who knows. let the so called expects deal with it. I just like my skeletal creature. Hmm, try Ashampoo HDD control. I got it free last night, but won't be free today.

Originally posted by JibbyJedi
reply to post by torsion

 

Felt like I was in a Speilberg movie in real life.

I know what you mean. I saw two of them flying side by side in 2007. There was no central light though, just three red corner ones. They were at a high altitude and one was rotating as it flew along. Clouds ruined the view after a few seconds. Truly a jaw-dropping sight while it lasted. Had I not seen it with a witness I would have thought I had dreamed it come the following day.

Not to be confused with the objects in the op video which I believe are Chinese lanterns.

Originally posted by JibbyJedi
pure image - files.abovetopsecret.com...

You've got to be kidding? That's the "Image of proof" ?? You coudl pass that to any advanced imagery laboratory and they'll all come up with any one of a hundred possible explanations - but I cannot see how any could say it's a craft.

I really want it to be real, I honestly, truly do. But, like Phage, I've grown weary of the countless fake jobbies out there. Some are good, some are not so good and some are just pathetic.

This Moscow vid immediately had me saying "fake" for similar reasons already voiced in this thread. What the CG fakers keep forgetting when they make their hoaxes is that their CG rendered footage is always so smooth and clean and when they insert it into shakey, everyday life video, it never matches up.

Sad really.

Originally posted by noonebutme

Originally posted by JibbyJedi
pure image - files.abovetopsecret.com...

You've got to be kidding? That's the "Image of proof" ??

You coudl pass that to any advanced imagery laboratory and they'll all come up with any one of a hundred possible explanations - but I cannot see how any could say it's a craft.

I really want it to be real, I honestly, truly do. But, like Phage, I've grown weary of the countless fake jobbies out there. Some are good, some are not so good and some are just pathetic.

I know it sucks and a terrible example. I was hesitant to even show it on here until I had the other pic extracted, but I couldn't help myself after seeing a lot of people on here good at dissecting photos. I thought maybe someone could lighten it up and see the shape of it, the darkness is just night time shooting through a window, I'm sure someone can determine something with that for now.

If it was a fake, I wouldn't be so bold in requesting any help dissecting it to it's core properties.
I'm also asking for assistance in helping me retrieve the better "proof" shot I got on 2 bad hard drives.
I'll accept the bashing over it, I know it sucks but at least I still got something to prove to myself I didn't hallucinate that experience.

Tell me or point me in the direction of a decent file recovery program that works with cell phones from 2007-2008 and I'll have the good image up here in minutes.

reply to post by JibbyJedi


I'm not saying your pic is "fake", nor was I implying/accusing you of trying to mislead anyone. I believe that what you took was of what you saw. My post was really about the quality, which I can understand, isn't the same as a National Geography documentry.

It really grates on me because, while I fully "believe" in the UFO phenomenon and advanced life on other worlds, etc - I have zero concrete evidence or proof. It's merely..."my belief" which is not a scientific statement.

And for all the mobile phone cameras, cctv, news crews, etc - we still have little if anything that stands up to true scientific scruteny.

Apologies if you thought I was attacking you - I wasn't. I just get frustrated with the whole UFO belief/lack of evidence dichotomy I live...

I'm thinking hoax. Real triangles are hardly every seen moving on edge as this thing seems to be doing. Why would that be? Maybe to show that it is supposed to be a triangle when it is a created hoax. Plus, the degree of intensity of the lights does not always correspond to the thickness of the clouds it is passing behind.

(Sorry, it these points have been mentioned, but I'm not wading through pages of innane thoughts on this.)

reply to post by Swills


I agree, thats definately an open window

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/56c2ff720e41.png[/atsimg]

Ok, so I dont know about the TR3 thing, but I saw one the other day (no pic, so it didnt happen i know) that looked like saturn (rings and all) lit up in the sky by blue EL lights and spinning.

So, you know, take that however, but I wasnt hallucinating, on drugs or under the influence...and it was only there for a minute

Originally posted by torsion
reply to post by JibbyJedi

 

That photo of the Belgian triangular "craft" is a bad example to use. The guy who took it has admitted it was a hoax.

as they say in wikipedia: Citation needed.

what guy, when did he say that?

-rrr

This is some nice footage.

Not Chinese lanterns because of behavior and looks of the object.

Not a reflection because the window is open

Could be CGI but i hope this is genuine.

seen plenty cgi...this is real.

LOL they could make a a fake invasion, but dont be so fooled to believe its all cgi or fake

There is a new one

www.youtube.com...

The OP video is just too fuzzy to make any kind of a determination. I'm leaning towards hoax because the typical triangle report is of a black fuselage, and there is no indication of a black fuse or even a shadow in the OP. If it was skimming along the bottom of the clouds like that then we should get a peek at the fuse now and then and we don't.

Originally posted by JibbyJedi
I think we can finally rule out Chinese lanterns on this one, getting a bit tired of hearing all UFOs are lanterns.

Well I get sick and tired of all the people that post videos of Chinese lanterns and claim that they're UFOs! It just makes a mockery of any serious UFO study when people flood the forums with crap videos & photos, and 95% of it is indeed crap. Every time I open a UFO thread I do it with hope that it may finally be something worth getting excited about, but typically it just brings more disappointment. There's a lot of very poor discernment around, that's for sure.

Originally posted by Bers81
There is a new one]

If you look at the tree tops in the clip and note the direction the wind is blowing (and how hard it's blowing) then you can easily dismiss this clip as some kind of gas-filled object floating with the wind.