Moon To Have No-fly Zones By Month End

Originally posted by buskey
No, this is not a joke. Let the conspiracy theories commence!

No-fly zones will come into effect on the moon for the very first time by the end of this month! Why, even buffer zones that spacecraft may have to avoid will come into existence. The reason: avoiding any spraying of rocket exhaust or dust onto certain historical sites and artefacts on the moon.

Source: www.thehindu.com...

Maybe NASA doesn't want anyone taking close up pictures of their alleged moon landing sites.

Thanks for the link. S & F for you.

The dark governments are working with the evil aliens on the moon and have a few Area 51's underground. Also they have secret weapons of mass destruction such as powerful lazer weapons in case there was some threat to earth from something in space or a war on earth. I was not surprised that they don't want no one to visit the moon now. I may sound like a fantasy but search it up on the worlds most powerful data base, GOOGLE.

Hmmmmm....just what do they have to enforce these lunar no-fly zones?

Originally posted by pot8er
Surely its just a case of wanting to protect the landing sites of the places where man has landed / interacted with the moon. Like a sort of a museum, but the real thing for all to see, now and for the future

This is the only thing that makes sense. Let's say they have bases on the moon, it's not like you need to fly right over them to see them, and it's not like they are going to build them where these historic landmarks are, so I don't see how these no fly zones could be covering something up? Protecting the landing sites (or "alleged" landing sites if you're into that) is the only reasonable explanation. It is interesting though that they do seem to believe moon traffic will be common someday.

reply to post by Argen


Nothing, it is a request, hoped to be honored by any agencies that may go. If you actually read the distances, is not that far, a cell phone at the requested distances would image the artifacts better than anything to date. But like anything else, if I request for everybody to stay away from a rock in Antarctica by 500 feet, and I'm not there to enforce it, tough crap for me huh, if you can get there.

reply to post by GrassyKnoll


My reply to Argen pretty much sums up my take, yet I don't see a conspiracy. I think it sounds kind of dumb though I know what the intention is, but I'm surprised they felt a need to publicly mention it. I don't run off devious sub reasons for it, lets see who can approach the sites within the requested suggested 'quarantine'.

One point is if an agency wants data about the area it's already collected, and I'm sure most of it is available to any scientific institute or agency as it has been demonstrated with the moon rocks lending. Survey somewhere else, expand the data share, we got these places covered already.

Rules, regulations, laws, and such require someone to actually enforce them. My question is, who is tasked with enforcing these laws? Oh, that's right, no one. Congratulations on creating another illegal law/regulation/rule because we already signed documents stating that the moon is free for everyone on the planet.

So what happens when this law/regulation/rule is broken? Illegally enforced laws are common practice these days..

The most interesting part of this thread is the citation about how not all of the restricted areas are historical in nature. Now that should excite the moon CT's.

As far as protecting poop in space, it's not like they couldn't recreate that experiment at a later date. This is a perfect example of a law that seems so silly people don't ask questions. It's a clever way to hide your secret bases, all in all, as far as I'm concerned.



Oh hey, look at the avatar. It's the first commercial spaceport. What timing?

It's not a law it's a request.

Originally posted by Illustronic
It's not a law it's a request.

No, it's a reccomendation. Here are some other notable "reccomendations" as of late:

Cutting Miltiary Pensions and Medicare / Medicaid
Streamlining Naturalization of Immigrants
Renewing the Patriot Act
Implementing Carbon Taxes at State Levels
Implementing Cap and Trade

The list goes on and on. You see, lately, recommendations become laws and previous laws become irrelevant.

We are the country that invades soverign nations without the consent of Congress, assassinates foreigners in foreign countries without trial, uses torture and rendition, ect..

reply to post by Illustronic


Nonetheless the issue at hand is no-fly zones OVER the alleged moon landing sites...unenforceable and illegal of course.

I find the recommendation by NASA pretty audacious.

Not being able to fly craft of any sort over those areas means not being able to obtain ultra high-resolution images of the alleged Apollo landing sites.

NASA is so full of astronaut feces.

Originally posted by caladonea
I personally think this story is a coverup ...for what is really going on. I think that TPTB from U.S. and other countries joined together quite some time ago.....and there are places in space that are already habitable. They don't really want us (common folk) to know about...that in case of a nuclear holocaust....they have somewhere to go...literally ...off this planet!

They have massive underground bunkers to escape a nuclear holocaust and angry 90-yr old peasants with pitchforks looking for revenge.

Let's get those private space vehicles up and running. If I were a wealthy conspiracy theorist (do they even exist?), I would offer a large reward for scanning the moon and bringing back proof of alien life or ruins. You can't tell Pandora not to open the box.

reply to post by sbctinfantry

As far as protecting poop in space, it's not like they couldn't recreate that experiment at a later date. This is a perfect example of a law that seems so silly people don't ask questions. It's a clever way to hide your secret bases, all in all, as far as I'm concerned.

now i am having a hard time about the poop, lol!

i am hoping they emptied a toilet and no one dropped their drawers behind a rock! lol!!!

preserving the 1st foot prints and landing would be a no brainer, to anyone.

no fly-zone? sure, let's see where they are first and then decide about a cover up.

why entertaining websites have been needed for anyone, if lovely nasa has existed??????

Originally posted by pot8er
Surely its just a case of wanting to protect the landing sites of the places where man has landed / interacted with the moon. Like a sort of a museum, but the real thing for all to see, now and for the future ? Imagine if you could fast forward 1000 years and take a look back at the sheer *snip* of what man of that day acheived with such sh*t equiptement. Ha ha, imagine it. I'd love it. Archaic machines, from 1000 years ago, still in the place that they landed. With all the footprints and vehicles dotted about too.

That's my take on it anyways. I'm always open to other reasons though, anythings possible.

 

Mod Edit: Profanity/Circumvention Of Censors – Please Review This Link.

edit on 7-9-2011 by GAOTU789 because: (no reason given)

It would be nice if I could see the equipment of the Apollo astronauts today never mind 1000 years from now.

All I have from NASA are blurry grey blobs allegedly depicting lunar modules and suspicious looking lines allegedly depicting astronaut footpaths and lunar rovers.

Originally posted by SarK0Y
why entertaining websites have been needed for anyone, if lovely nasa has existed??????

Soviet Politburo was more believable and trustworthy than NASA.

Originally posted by buskey
No, this is not a joke. Let the conspiracy theories commence!

No-fly zones will come into effect on the moon for the very first time by the end of this month! Why, even buffer zones that spacecraft may have to avoid will come into existence. The reason: avoiding any spraying of rocket exhaust or dust onto certain historical sites and artefacts on the moon.

Source: www.thehindu.com...

Well i quess you did not hear that the treaty with earth was cancel

Originally posted by OMsk3ptic

Originally posted by pot8er
Surely its just a case of wanting to protect the landing sites of the places where man has landed / interacted with the moon. Like a sort of a museum, but the real thing for all to see, now and for the future

This is the only thing that makes sense. Let's say they have bases on the moon, it's not like you need to fly right over them to see them, and it's not like they are going to build them where these historic landmarks are, so I don't see how these no fly zones could be covering something up? Protecting the landing sites (or "alleged" landing sites if you're into that) is the only reasonable explanation. It is interesting though that they do seem to believe moon traffic will be common someday.

yes earth treathy got anul we are open for a free for all and that include the one from above
better learn to duck are have a BOB ready to go