It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Finally PROOF (?) of an explanation of the Pyramid Shape inside the Human Body

page: 1
3
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 6 2011 @ 10:17 AM
link   
After viewing this entire video and understanding that by using the extended lines in the depiction which this video poster has supplied i have finally seen with my own eyes the pyramid shape within the human body.
i also could see how the rectangle was placed around the fish's head after the "red box" was superimposed.

Of course the image of comparison became easier to "see" once there was proper orientation of the diagram comparing the spine and ribs.

For all of those in doubt or wanting to debunk this video remember this is only one theory in very basic terms.
Yet, what the narrator says does go along almost exactly with what is being shown in the video.
Also as the narrator states at the very begining this video provides "one way to answer the question". As i am sure there are other ways of saying things.




posted on Sep, 6 2011 @ 10:27 AM
link   
reply to post by trika3000
 




Nuff Said



posted on Sep, 6 2011 @ 10:29 AM
link   
That just might be the absolute Least technically involved explanation of a subject (if true) would be much more complicated. Problem with the Hapeh Theory: If every step in the evolution perpetuates a characteristic of previous steps, wouldn't every intermediate step share that same characteristic. E.g. how can you make the connection between the spine of the fish and human when the insect has no spine?
Just to offer a point of reason: The creator of this explanation does not even orient the heads equally (one laterally and the other longitudinally) during his frail attempt of a logical explanation. Doesn't this speak to his ability to reason?

This proves nothing!!! Please remove 'Proof' from you title!


edit on 6-9-2011 by TomServo because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 6 2011 @ 10:35 AM
link   
Well I looked up the site this video comes from HappehTheory


This has to be a joke right?

Shadows in photographs are called "Black in the face" and can tell you where your body is imbalanced?

"The face on the torso can be used to diagnose the condition of the face on the head"??

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/7fdd6c982ab4.jpg[/atsimg]


edit on 6-9-2011 by davespanners because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 6 2011 @ 10:41 AM
link   

Originally posted by davespanners
Well I looked up the site this video comes from HappehTheory


This has to be a joke right?

Shadows in photographs are called "Black in the face" and can tell you where your body is imbalanced?

"The face on the torso can be used to diagnose the condition of the face on the head"??



The videos are none the less interesting. I believe thunderf00t (debunker) is a nemesis of happeh (needs more then tinfoil hat). And in all honesty, its not a joke to him.

Might I add, his theories, are inconsequential to any subject....oh and the subjects, have you seen the one on chronic masturbating? Dear lord....

edit on 6-9-2011 by topherman420 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 6 2011 @ 10:41 AM
link   
reply to post by davespanners
 


And that is how we can prove that H.R. Puff n Stuff was an intermediate step in the evolutionary process...




posted on Sep, 6 2011 @ 10:43 AM
link   
OP, the video you posted is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in that rambling, incoherent video was he even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this forum is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
edit on 6-9-2011 by Hydroman because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 6 2011 @ 10:44 AM
link   
reply to post by trika3000
 


Please dont think this is an attack because i think you stated clearly that this 'one way' to explain. but that is complete and utter tosh, you can take any creature and make pyramids out of its shape with such loose rules as used in this video. so we chop a fish head off, and follow 'more or less' the outline of the head... what is the fish used, how about we use a flounder... or a hammerhead shark, or a wobbegong? How come we get to ignore the neck on a person? since when did pyramids have a rectangular base as a rule?

I think I may be missing the point!!!



posted on Sep, 6 2011 @ 11:22 AM
link   
Hmm, I just thought I was going to see something special.

and is it just me, but does the guy sound like he is doing that for pure fun of it?



posted on Sep, 6 2011 @ 11:22 AM
link   
Mammals and finally humans.



posted on Sep, 6 2011 @ 11:23 AM
link   
 




 



posted on Sep, 6 2011 @ 12:03 PM
link   
WTF!!!!!!!!
This is a joke right??



posted on Sep, 6 2011 @ 12:13 PM
link   
reply to post by TomServo
 


The title says Finally Proof (?) of an explanation. And the video proves that there is an explanation. Besides i did put a question mark in parentheses. And if that isn't proof i don't know what proof is



posted on Sep, 6 2011 @ 12:21 PM
link   
reply to post by 8ILlBILl8
 


Oh yeah, so you and my family agree on somethin'...



posted on Sep, 6 2011 @ 12:24 PM
link   
reply to post by lammypie999
 




How come we get to ignore the neck on a person?


Obviously we would have to discount the neck of the human individual, as fish have no necks. The comparision would be rendered invalid if we included the neck.



posted on Sep, 6 2011 @ 12:34 PM
link   
reply to post by TomServo
 




If every step in the evolution perpetuates a characteristic of previous steps, wouldn't every intermediate step share that same characteristic. E.g. how can you make the connection between the spine of the fish and human when the insect has no spine?


You bring up a very good point in which i upon my sixth viewing of the video has now become apparent. i sit here with my notebook full of equations and i still can't figure this one out. Other than perhaps insects actually came after humans in evolution. But there is no clear indicator one way or the other. i'm going back to check out further data.

Oh, i get it now you were speaking figuratively, as the insect is spineless...
edit on 09/03/11 by trika3000 because: math is hard



posted on Sep, 6 2011 @ 12:59 PM
link   
Obviously the theory "flounders" when we look at the shape of the Flounder!

What about Seahorses, or Butterfly Fish, to name a few! They have different shaped heads. Not all fish are the same shape!

Although I must admit that some folks have wider hips than they do shoulders, so they very might be the original pyramids, but I have always seen them as Pear-shaped!



posted on Sep, 6 2011 @ 04:29 PM
link   
Folk's y'all are missing hte pint.....or at least the title.....

Read the title again - "Proof of an explaination...."......I think the title (at least) is perfectly accurate - this is absolute proof that an explaination exists.

that the explaination itself is laughable is par for the course - this is skunkworks after all
- but this is definitely proof that there is one!

Finally - a thread in Skunk that offers proof ...........AND ACTUALLY DELIVERS IT!

Well done OP!


Yours in semantic pedantry....

Gaul



posted on Sep, 6 2011 @ 09:23 PM
link   


the guy in the video can explain just about anything using anything else, just pick two things and he will do it for yah


the human body has a pyramid shape in it?!!.... the picture shows a pyramid that has a human body in it.....
well, yeah, no problem.. he must have an explaination for that too



posted on Sep, 7 2011 @ 01:05 AM
link   
After listening (actually reading) the comments so far i think what i originally thought has now maybe came up against some doubt. i will go back and study all of the issues much further as i seemed to have missed my own point. i thought FINALLY a perfect theory, but as has been shown to me this theory still has some "loose ends" (so to speak). i hope we all have learned a valuble lesson.



new topics

top topics



 
3
<<   2 >>

log in

join