It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
reply to post by Maarhuis
So arrogant and ignorant, i was one of the several Christians debating on this thread, and i only became a follower of Christ in the last year! indoctrination from birth? I don't think so!!!
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
reply to post by JohnPhoenix
Because there is nothing in the Bible that mentions beings for other planets.
Don't you think if there were other intelligent beings other than humans it would be mentioned?
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
reply to post by JohnPhoenix
Because there is nothing in the Bible that mentions beings for other planets.
Don't you think if there were other intelligent beings other than humans it would be mentioned?
It is mentioned in many ancient text and religions as well as current religions. All one has to do is read VEDIC LIERATURE OF ANCIENT INDIA....THEHOLY INDIAN SAGES....THE RAMAYANA.....has multiple references to Aliens and flying craft.
It has now been proven by computer models of the night sky above the Three Great Pyramids in GIZA....that the three pyramids perfectly line up with the three stars in Orions belt....10,000 years ago. There is a virtual ZERO PROBABILITY that this allignment could have happened by chance.
Plus the Great Pyramid had a chamber where copper sheets hung from the ceiling with a long small angular tunnel leading out of it and pointed at a specific star cluster. Reproduction on smaller scale models has proved that this creates a tight MICROWAVE BEAM directed at this star cluster....and this is powered by the Earths movement as well as it's vibrationary state.
How do you explain that? Split Infinity
...Among these critiques are several from two astronomers, Ed Krupp of Griffith Observatory in Los Angeles and Anthony Fairall, astronomy professor at the University of Cape Town, South Africa. Using planetarium equipment, Krupp and Fairall independently investigated the angle between the alignment of Orion's Belt and north during the era cited by Hancock, Bauval et al. (which differs from the angle seen today or in the 3rd millennium BC, because of the precession of the equinoxes), and found that the angle was somewhat different from the "perfect match" claimed by Bauval and Hancock in the Orion Constellation Theory– 47-50 degrees per the planetarium measurements, compared to the 38 degree angle formed by the pyramids.[5]
Krupp also pointed out that the slightly-bent line formed by the three pyramids was deviated towards the north, whereas the slight "kink" in the line of Orion's Belt was deformed to the south, and to match them up one or the other of them had to be turned upside-down.[6] Indeed, this is what was done in the original book by Bauval and Gilbert (The Orion Mystery), which compared images of the pyramids and Orion without revealing the pyramids' map had been inverted.[7]
Krupp and Fairall find other problems with the claims, including noting that if the Sphinx is meant to represent the constellation of Leo, then it should be on the opposite side of the Nile (the "Milky Way") from the pyramids ("Orion"),[5][6] that the vernal equinox c. 10,500 BC was in Virgo and not Leo,[5] and that in any case the constellations of the Zodiac originate from Mesopotamia and are completely unknown in Egypt until the much later Graeco-Roman era.[7] Ed Krupp repeated this "upside down" claim in the BBC documentary Atlantis Reborn (1999).
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by The GUT
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
reply to post by JohnPhoenix
Because there is nothing in the Bible that mentions beings for other planets.
Don't you think if there were other intelligent beings other than humans it would be mentioned?
It is mentioned in many ancient text and religions as well as current religions. All one has to do is read VEDIC LIERATURE OF ANCIENT INDIA....THEHOLY INDIAN SAGES....THE RAMAYANA.....has multiple references to Aliens and flying craft.
It has now been proven by computer models of the night sky above the Three Great Pyramids in GIZA....that the three pyramids perfectly line up with the three stars in Orions belt....10,000 years ago. There is a virtual ZERO PROBABILITY that this allignment could have happened by chance.
Plus the Great Pyramid had a chamber where copper sheets hung from the ceiling with a long small angular tunnel leading out of it and pointed at a specific star cluster. Reproduction on smaller scale models has proved that this creates a tight MICROWAVE BEAM directed at this star cluster....and this is powered by the Earths movement as well as it's vibrationary state.
How do you explain that? Split Infinity
Sorry, disproven would be more like it. Unproven at the very least.It's always good to read the most literate and scholarly opposing opinions when claims like this are made and then make up your mind:
...Among these critiques are several from two astronomers, Ed Krupp of Griffith Observatory in Los Angeles and Anthony Fairall, astronomy professor at the University of Cape Town, South Africa. Using planetarium equipment, Krupp and Fairall independently investigated the angle between the alignment of Orion's Belt and north during the era cited by Hancock, Bauval et al. (which differs from the angle seen today or in the 3rd millennium BC, because of the precession of the equinoxes), and found that the angle was somewhat different from the "perfect match" claimed by Bauval and Hancock in the Orion Constellation Theory– 47-50 degrees per the planetarium measurements, compared to the 38 degree angle formed by the pyramids.[5]
Krupp also pointed out that the slightly-bent line formed by the three pyramids was deviated towards the north, whereas the slight "kink" in the line of Orion's Belt was deformed to the south, and to match them up one or the other of them had to be turned upside-down.[6] Indeed, this is what was done in the original book by Bauval and Gilbert (The Orion Mystery), which compared images of the pyramids and Orion without revealing the pyramids' map had been inverted.[7]
Krupp and Fairall find other problems with the claims, including noting that if the Sphinx is meant to represent the constellation of Leo, then it should be on the opposite side of the Nile (the "Milky Way") from the pyramids ("Orion"),[5][6] that the vernal equinox c. 10,500 BC was in Virgo and not Leo,[5] and that in any case the constellations of the Zodiac originate from Mesopotamia and are completely unknown in Egypt until the much later Graeco-Roman era.[7] Ed Krupp repeated this "upside down" claim in the BBC documentary Atlantis Reborn (1999).
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
reply to post by JohnPhoenix
Because there is nothing in the Bible that mentions beings for other planets.
Don't you think if there were other intelligent beings other than humans it would be mentioned?
There is plenty of documented verifiable evidence that the person you refer to as Jesus existed.
Originally posted by autowrench
reply to post by Kicking2bears
There is plenty of documented verifiable evidence that the person you refer to as Jesus existed.
Tell you what.
Show me this proof, this documentation, the verifiable evidence you speak of so confidently, I will recant everything I have ever said concerning this issue, and believe me that is plenty, and will become a Bible thumping Christian myself.
Granted, not all Christians think alike. The hierarchy of the Catholic church serves as a recent example. Many other Christians believe in the ET nature of alien visitors, however, the largest and most vocal segment seems to be the one that claims ETs are demons or fallen angels. For this segment, they MUST claim than ETs are demonic in order to maintain their belief in Jesus as savior. They must use the Bible to prove the Bible. For example, they prove th belief that aliens are fallen angels by relating the story of the Nephilim. This, according to the myth, proves that ET is of satanic origin. If they did otherwise, the entire story collapses. And they’re right – the existence of Jesus and his sacrifice here on Earth would be a pointless exercise for a God that created an infinite number of beings on other worlds, some of whom are visiting Earth. The demon/fallen angel origins of alien beings is the only theory that fits and gels with Christian dogma. For such a Christian, this theory makes perfect sense and confirms to them that they are at war with spiritual forces, not flesh and blood beings and that ET from other worlds don’t exist, only spiritually-based demons and fallen angels.
Originally posted by IlluminatusOculus33
Aliens teach a Satanic New Age religion of people worshiping Gaia. They are demons my friends. They take people out of the safety of their homes. Psychologically damage them and tell them they are the saviors of this planet and tell the abductees to spread their New Age philosophy.
Satan is doing his best to lead as many people into Hell as he can. It's a shame so many people are duped by his lies. Aliens won't save you, only Jesus Christ can my friends.
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
reply to post by JohnPhoenix
Because there is nothing in the Bible that mentions beings for other planets.
Don't you think if there were other intelligent beings other than humans it would be mentioned?
I am aware of this claim....they did not take into account Gravitic lensing as it applies to Galactic Stellar Positioning. Nor did they take into account a change in both our Suns Wobble as well as the Earths. They used a constant variable rather than an algorythmic expodential assignment of movement. Split Infinity
Originally posted by Karikuy
I think that many religious people are quick to say that aliens are the fallen angels of god just do to description in the bible. Of coarse most people are afraid of the unknown and label them as demons or what not. Then again until you've met one how do you know if they are good beings or not, many descriptions from contactees and those who were abducted describe some of them as soul less or reptilian in behavior. So who knows really until they make contact and we get to know them.
"But the UFO phenomenon simply does not behave like extraterrestrial visitors. It actually molds itself in order to fit a given culture."
- John Ankerberg, The Facts on UFOs and Other Supernatural Phenomena, p. 10
"Human beings are under the control of a strange force that bends them in absurd ways, forcing them to play a role in a bizarre game of deception." - Dr. Jacques Vallee, Messengers of Deception, p. 20
"We are dealing with a multidimensional paraphysical phenomenon which is largely indigenous to planet earth." - Brad Steiger, [cited in] Blue Book Files Released in Canadian UFO Report, Vol. 4, No. 4, 1977, p. 20
"We are part of a symbiotic relationship with something which disguises itself as an extra-terrestrial invasion so as not to alarm us." -Terrence McKenna [from a lecture]
"One theory which can no longer be taken very seriously is that UFOs are interstellar spaceships." - Arthur C. Clarke, New York Times Book Review, 07/27/75
"There seems to be no evidence yet that any of these craft or beings originate from outer space." -Gordon Creighton, Official 1992 Flying Saucer Review Policy Statement
"A large part of the available UFO literature is closely linked with mysticism and the metaphysical. It deals with subjects like mental telepathy, automatic writing and invisible entities as well as phenomena like poltergeist [ghost] manifestation and 'possession.' Many of the UFO reports now being published in the popular press recount alleged incidents that are strikingly similar to demonic possession and psychic phenomena." - Lynn E. Catoe, UFOs and Related Subjects: USGPO, 1969; prepared under AFOSR Project Order 67-0002 and 68-0003
"UFO behaviour is more akin to magic than to physics as we know it... the modern UFOnauts and the demons of past days are probably identical." -Dr. Pierre Guerin, FSR Vol. 25, No. 1, p. 13-14
www.mt.net...