It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Aggie Man
Originally posted by Skewed
reply to post by Extralien
In my opinion, and at this point in the game I say for any bank that gets convicted of all these crimes, any and all people with outstanding mortgages are free and clear with a clean title. That is the best restitution possible for the situation.edit on 2-9-2011 by Skewed because: (no reason given)
I would almost agree with that....except...I bought a home well within my means, while many others overextended themselves so they could buy much more than they needed. So, if we are all free and clear, then I am (in a round about way) being punished for being responsible.
If "free and clear" is the outcome, then I want additional restitution to balance the scales.
Honestly, if you took on the responsibility of debt, then I believe you are obligated to see your responsibility through; regardless of how the other party may have acted.
Of course, a bit of punitive damages awarded to the home owner would be nice.edit on 2-9-2011 by Aggie Man because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Some banks were a little too greedy in giving out questionable(at best) loans to people that did not deserve them with little or no collateral. Then they took the good with bad loans and packaged them into CDS and sold as derivative investments.
Sure some homeowners wanted a bigger and better house, but if the banks were greedy and stupid enough to lend them the cash without due dillegence THEN its the banks fault more so than the consumer. Its like some snake oil salesmen trying to sell you a free energy machine and you accepting the offer.
People who were responsible for the most part have very little to worry about.
Originally posted by Skewed
reply to post by Aggie Man
Fantasy or not, it is better than any monies going to the government. It is the peoples money any way that was stolen from them, the government has not lost a dime.
If the government actually does start filing suits, then I think people should intervene with their own lawsuits and demand that the peoples case be tried before the Attorney Generals case.edit on 2-9-2011 by Skewed because: (no reason given)