It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Montana
Or the rest of the world might find out they get by just fine without us.
I think our economy depends too much on what goodwill we have left in the world to ignore it. Isolation might work for a year or two, but so many of our trade partners expect some fed kickbacks (my term, others call it foreign aid) for them to maintain a favorable trade environment. If they don't get the frosting, they won't want the cake.
Did that make sense??
God, I hope so....
Originally posted by Montana
I think our economy depends too much on what goodwill we have left in the world to ignore it. Isolation might work for a year or two, but so many of our trade partners expect some fed kickbacks (my term, others call it foreign aid) for them to maintain a favorable trade environment. If they don't get the frosting, they won't want the cake.
Originally posted by dcgolf
Good Point - Wouldn't it make sense, though, that if they wanted to maintain that favorable trade environment, they may be willing to make some concessions to us to continue this environment?
Originally posted by AceOfBase
The countries getting foreign aid aren't really big trading partners.
All of the biggest trading partners are donators of foreign aid themselves.
There are military bases in some of those countries but I don't think they would be sad to see them go.
[edit on 21-8-2004 by AceOfBase]
Originally posted by taibunsuu
Wars outside the US are generally fabricated on lies. For an excellent and timeless essay on this written by a famous Marine who won two MOHs read:
lexrex.com...
With a country as robust in climate and resources as the US we could stay militarily neutral with only a self-defense force and do very well for ourselves. Just look at Scandanavian countries, or Switzerland.
Originally posted by Montana
Originally posted by dcgolf
Good Point - Wouldn't it make sense, though, that if they wanted to maintain that favorable trade environment, they may be willing to make some concessions to us to continue this environment?
Well, yes and no I think. To be Isolated we would also have to get rid of the lowered tariffs, subsidised shipping and other perks we give corporations in other countries to make sure they come and play in our yard.
Without those they may find greener pastures elsewhere.
Originally posted by Montana
Well, I guess we could look back at other times the US has assumed an isolationist stance and see what happened then. I am definately not a good enough historian to comment on that, but maybe someone else here is?
Originally posted by Murcielago
Originally posted by taibunsuu
Wars outside the US are generally fabricated on lies. For an excellent and timeless essay on this written by a famous Marine who won two MOHs read:
lexrex.com...
With a country as robust in climate and resources as the US we could stay militarily neutral with only a self-defense force and do very well for ourselves. Just look at Scandanavian countries, or Switzerland.
Thats True, But I'd rather be a power military super power then just another guy(country).
So basically, 30% of every one of your paychecks is the cost you're paying for you, personally, to be a military super power.
"You," the taxpayer, are not a military superpower. You pay for one and somehow connect nationalistic pride to the military.
We could be a military superpower by protecting ourselves.
If we are truly interested in protecting America, it should be done without sending the bulk of our military to the other side of the world to play in the quicksand invading third-world countries.
Originally posted by taibunsuu
Originally posted by Murcielago
Originally posted by taibunsuu
Wars outside the US are generally fabricated on lies. For an excellent and timeless essay on this written by a famous Marine who won two MOHs read:
lexrex.com...
With a country as robust in climate and resources as the US we could stay militarily neutral with only a self-defense force and do very well for ourselves. Just look at Scandanavian countries, or Switzerland.
Thats True, But I'd rather be a power military super power then just another guy(country).
So basically, 30% of every one of your paychecks is the cost you're paying for you, personally, to be a military super power.
"You," the taxpayer, are not a military superpower. You pay for one and somehow connect nationalistic pride to the military.
We could be a military superpower by protecting ourselves.
If we are truly interested in protecting America, it should be done without sending the bulk of our military to the other side of the world to play in the quicksand invading third-world countries.
Exactly my point. What would be the monetary benefits to the common man in the form of taxes as opposed to the negative drawbacks from this new policy?
Originally posted by dcgolf
Is it time to cut off Isreal? What is our infatuation with this country? Why are they the biggest recepient of foreign aid? They have a military that is clearly dominant over their immediate rivals.
Is this one of the main reasons the US is so hated throughout the world? Is this why OBL and his followers wish to attack us? What effect would it have on the world (and us) if we were to mind our own business and stop being big brother?