It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by favouriteslave
Originally posted by TheOneElectric
reply to post by Valtor
Hidden hand said that the negative Harvest was for those who are working for the negative harvest. There was to be/will be a positive harvest as well. Go back and re-read.
I have no clue if hidden hand is valid or not, a lot of what was said has shown not to be correct...but it felt...well it felt like it was going in the proper path.
Can you give me a link to that thread please?
Thanks!
Originally posted by Valtor
Originally posted by sheba2011
The hidden hands thread -- they said next harvest was for those in negative polarity...
Yes my friend. Current Earth becomes 4th density positive (the process taking 100 to 700 years)
So the negs will be harvested and disappear from here. The highest Elites will be gone. We will have a chance to create a great reality here.
Originally posted by adraves
reply to post by 200457
They must have changed it then. It was there...
No one else saw this?
irc.va.us.mibbit.net
#102811
Originally posted by TheOneElectric
reply to post by Valtor
Ah, I see. The fault is mine. Apologies.
Originally posted by adraves
I still think this video is important:
I also think the phone number and *pin are important.
Any thoughts?
Edit: Don't forget about this code there...
irc.va.us.mibbit.net
#102811
What could it mean?edit on 12-9-2011 by adraves because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by favouriteslave
Originally posted by 200457
Ok so back to pi. I asked open for a hint in figuring out pi.html and got this in reply:
"Here's a little boost. What is Pi? You need to know why Pi happens. After you have understanding, look at pictures of galaxies, apply that knowledge to them. It's only a step."
So galaxies are circular, spirals, and rotating. How can pi relate to that? We also know that some galaxies, like ours, have a black hole in the center.
edit on 12-9-2011 by 200457 because: (no reason given)
Pi is the only direction left after the 2D. a singularity or point is 1D. Two singularities connected by a line is 2D. The natural direction would be for one dot to stay put and the other to travel around as a compass does to draw a circle.
So we need 2 singularities to acheive a Pi?
Originally posted by sheba2011
This is a honeypot operation.
Originally posted by 200457
I'm thinking it could be that singularity exists in all dimensions at once, so it is not a true singularity. It is a sphere, such as the universe, because the universe is expanding in all directions at an equal rate.
Say we are at singularity. It is a dot, but if a two dimensional observer would view it as a circle, correct? The dot is just that after all. Then the 3-d observer, which could be us, would view it as a sphere. After all, all is contained in singularity, so we would have to assume that our universe is a sphere, due to pi's constraints on what a sphere is.
Please tell me someone understands what I am getting at, it is so hard to explain.
Originally posted by TNTarheel
Originally posted by adraves
[I remember there being mentions in TEXT msgs and e-mails that there is a code to be found. I think the supposed pin is it. *xxxx
Text messages? I did not know it was possible to send a text to a landline
As counterintuitive as it may sound, it is possible for certain cellular phone customers to send a text message to a landline. The recipient of such a text message does not need a modified telephone, however. The text message is automatically converted to an automated voice message through "text to voice" technology. All the recipient must do is listen to the message and respond with a recorded voice message of his or her own.
Originally posted by favouriteslave
Originally posted by 200457
I'm thinking it could be that singularity exists in all dimensions at once, so it is not a true singularity. It is a sphere, such as the universe, because the universe is expanding in all directions at an equal rate.
Say we are at singularity. It is a dot, but if a two dimensional observer would view it as a circle, correct? The dot is just that after all. Then the 3-d observer, which could be us, would view it as a sphere. After all, all is contained in singularity, so we would have to assume that our universe is a sphere, due to pi's constraints on what a sphere is.
Please tell me someone understands what I am getting at, it is so hard to explain.
I'm following...........
All is contained within each sinularity. You cannot have a 2nd or 3rd dimension unless you start with 2 singularities. Imagine two (circles) Pi's one behind another with space between. Draw a line from one circle to the one behind it. Somewhat like making a tube. I'm still babbling and brainstorming in my head.
Originally posted by favouriteslave
Bah Im not even making sense to myself anymore
If a singularity contains all then it must begin at 3D, length, width, depth
Perhaps a singularity is all you need! Why need 2?
Originally posted by Didymus42
Just getting back from a camp trip and reconnecting with nauture for a few days. It looks like a lot changed...2 new manuals, new home page, over 100 pages added to the thread. Did anything happen with regard to the counter ticking down to 4092333735 or changes relative to 9/11?
Originally posted by buddhatrance
Originally posted by Grower
reply to post by TNTarheel
TNT, you may have voiced this before, but if you do not agree with the pack mentality at any given moment, your voice will be overlooked and brushed aside.
Grower, please allow me to say this (and not to you specifically), but to say that it falls on deaf ears, that there is a pack mentality, that those who continue to be interested in this are brainwashed, is completely unfair.
I sense a superiority complex, like 'we know better than you silly herd of sheep', that has no solid ground. For one, there is a bunch of sharp minds here, math and spiritually oriented, who are compelled to find out what this all means. Secondly, even the skeptics keep coming back like a moth to a flame, and don't tell me that this is not because you also are secretly curious to know where it all leads in the end (but don't want to admit it).
I appreciate those who are skeptical, and thank god that there is a mix of both here to create balance. It's even fun to follow that drama. It's the way in which this is expressed that sometimes I do not agree with.
To me, the truth is that it's just a different approach to finding out what this site is about. Those actively involved in solving 'the puzzle' because they are intrigued, and those busy telling others that this is meaningless, but follow the thread nonetheless. Active/passive interest. No one is better than the other.
Stating that this is meaningless/suspicious/dangerous/pointless doesn't make one more intelligent than the ones that have been discussing the content of the site, sharing at times beautiful insights. We are all intelligent, we have just chosen to focus our minds in a different direction. I see no pack mentality here. I see bright minds.
Peace.