MIT scientists come up with "vaccine" for all viruses called DRACO

Originally posted by Faery34majick
The mere mention of Reptilians in the video and I stopped listening.

I know right, Why are they always coming down on us sleestaks!

Bunch of racists!

reply to post by SaturnFX


Lol the whole reptilian thing makes me LOLGASAM, really? SOMBODY needs to stop watching sci-fi...
I can never take that seriously... but this vaccine DOES seem to good to be true, but i highly doubt its gonna turn us all into lizard people xD

Double-stranded RNA [dsRNA] Activated Caspase Oligomerizer

DRACO.


Looks extremely promising. Sadly things like this get overhyped before all the bugs are worked out. I hope this treatment becomes a reality, it would change the world.

First of all, I'm already an O negative Blueblood, with enhanced strength, speed, and intellect. I'm already 78% Reptilian

Secondly, HELL YEAH SCIENCE!

No seriously, this is a great thing. Yes, it can be abused, but so can a fork (do you understand what I mean?). This is a good thing, don't taint it with negativity or pessimism. Hope for a better future, always.

Originally posted by CasiusIgnoranze
Why does this discovery come along when we have movies like "Rise of the Planet of the Apes" recently released? Plus this is extremely similar to movies like "I am Legend" and "Resident Evil" where they bring out this wonder "cure for cancer/everything" and then whoooops - everybody is a Zombie!

But seriously...Draco as the name of the vaccine? The name is riddled with Esoteric meaning even though it stands for a complicated scientific word:

Draco: from Draconian. The laws for draconian punishments were said to have been written in blood.

Draco (Dracon): an Athenian lawgiver whose harsh legal code punished both trivial and serious crimes in Athens with death--hence the continued use of the word draconian to describe repressive legal measures.

Also it is interesting to point out that this Vaccine is being funded by DARPA and other defence contractors aswell.

This work is funded by a grant from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the New England Regional Center of Excellence for Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Diseases, with previous funding from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Defense Threat Reduction Agency, and Director of Defense Research & Engineering (now the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering).

Why the hell would several defence organisations be interested in a cure for viruses?

Something sounds fishy here...

edit on 23-8-2011 by CasiusIgnoranze because: .

Because these viruses could eventually be weaponized. Ever read Tom Clancy? He wrote a book called Executive decisions, in that an Iranian doctor successfully creates a weaponized version of the Ebola virus, which they then infect as many Americans as they can.

That type of scenario could be possible in the future, and the defense agencies would like to know that there are ways around these viruses.

This breakthrough will be a key to preventing the dangers of weaponized viruses.

reply to post by gunshooter


Its on ATS friend I will seek it for you I think it was Illuminate speak on ATS or something. Give me a sec.








Hope that helped, gunshooter. there are more but these are 3 of them, in one of them they speak of the 7 new planets and cures...

/4yxqm77

Here is ALL of your solutions.

There's already a thread about this news.

Go to this link Link

This is one step in others that're the beginning of our new dependency on human-controlled evolution. It's frightening because we're attempting to usurp natural evolution.

Yet, natural evolution is what created us. It's also what can destroy us.

This is ackin to a train that desires to go off the tracks to pave its own way...

reply to post by jyze420


Wow awesome find! You had me all the eay until you started the reptilian rubbish.
For the lords sake, go get some fresh air... Reptiles? Id love to see you pose thisquestion to the researchers in question. The look on their faces would be hilarious. Theyd probly just give you a lollipop nd be on their way

could this DRACO be the beginning of the days of living dead? the thought of the days like "I Am Legend" or "day of the dead" and"28 days later" all have one thing in common, all are baced on some man made vaccine that comes back with a vengaince.
now be good little sheep get your shot.

reply to post by Nikola014


in that thread YOU said this reminded you of an xfiles episode, but you wouldnt say which one, i asked you which one and you insulted me without answering the question

you also implied the word draco had some relevance to the drug being malicious but you did not define how so?, so i asked you, how so? i even offered my own guess that you were meaning how the word draco means dragon is that it?

again! you would not answer except to insult me,

you are not being helpfull on this website with that attitude,

question = answer - research progress's

in your case, lack of details = more questions = no answers from you = leading people in circles wasting their time,

you are a detremint to the effort to find truth and deny ignorance,

be definitive and clear with your points, or just shut the hell up your getting in the way.

my point with these thre posts of mine now aimed at you have one sole purpose, an answer to a question which should have never existed if you were not so cryptic,

those questions again are

Originally posted by pryingopen3rdeye

Originally posted by Nikola014
Don't you find this interesting?

Don't this remind you on something from the tv show "The X files"?

We don't need this universal drug.

This is just something really bad.

Don't take this drug.

Cheers.

tell us what episode you are referring to, describe a scene from it, give us something to go on so we can dig it up

Originally posted by Nikola014
Did you notice how is this drug named?
Draco.

What are they thinking?
That we are so stupid?

They're wrong.
Hope we'll never use this drug.

what the are you referring to? draco other wise means dragon right? so what are you getting at?

if you can not answer a question and can only present more then in my opinion you are no better then the governments and societies who create the problems which are hidden that we so avidly try to uncover here,

dont create questions when you have answers, or else you are like them, you must try to provide the answers you have, failing to do so hurts our efforts, it does not aid them

and your insults do nothing more then hurt the effort also

reply to post by pryingopen3rdeye



Where did you see insult here?

I don't want to go off topic,but i only said my opinion.I can said what i think,right?

Sorry mods for off topic but this are serious charges

reply to post by Nikola014


the topic is a drug, you said the drug reminds you of an episode from x files, you also said the name of the drug is suspicious in some way,

i ask for the details, what episode was it? and what is suspicious about the name draco? 4 posts later you still have not answered those questions, the answers would be very on topic indeed,

your continued lack of an answer is all that is off topic,

reply to post by VonDoomen


Why rubbish my friend...

wait, so they actually cured the common cold among other things?


if so, we'll lose one of the most overused stereotypes. oh, and hell just froze over

I tend not to get too excited about purported medical breakthroughs anymore unless it involves something that's already accessible to the public. For example, elderberry extract has been shown in multiple studies to be effective against some influenza strains and other viruses. It's something safe with no side effects. It's something I can obtain. It's something I'd be more interested in.

It takes an average of 10 to 15 years just to get a new drug or treatment for something approved, due not just to the time it takes to conduct studies, etc, but because of extensive delays involving bureaucratic oversight and approval. In addition, most medical breakthroughs we hear about never actually materialize. Only a small percentage of drugs found effective in vitro and in lab animals are ultimately found suitable for approval in humans.

reply to post by IamCorrect
the problem is that there is no money to made by using what nature provides, if it man made then there is money to made, R&D, marketing, FDA,ect. and then a pill or treatment for the side effects ,ask your doc if it good for you , if you have... then this drug might not be best for you. see our ad in ... well should get the idea by now. if it is made in the lab, has FDA stamp of approval it has some nasty side effects, then it meant for you . if you can grow it get it from a plant, find it in the health food store, and needs no FDA, then it is bad for you.

Originally posted by SunnyDee
Just another way to take from the working man. Sometimes that occasional cold is a nice break from work. Next thing you know, they'll be taking away our sick-time!

Sick time will disappear anyway once those pesky unions are put in their place and the fat cats can get their golf buddy legislatures to change the labor laws to dickensian levels.

Also, how in the world will big pharma let this Genie out? There go all their profits for hundreds of prescription and otcs...naah, only the elites will have access to this if it works.

reply to post by the owlbear


If it DOES work it will end up like that aids cure....