It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Gabe Valdez was a former New Mexico state patrol officer in the Dulce, New Mexico area. During his tenure, beginning in the 1970's, he was tasked with investigating mysterious cattle mutilations. The area suffered many cases of cattle found mutilated without blood, organs that appeared carefully removed and cuts in the skin that were so precise they were believed to be made by lasers. After years of research Valdez concluded that a clandestine government agency was responsible and that they used secret underground bases in the Dulce area for their experiments.
I have investigated a cattle mutilation case myself, just down the road from Dulce over the Colorado border, outside the town of Trinidad. Like many other cases, a cow was found with the udder missing, patches of skin removed, the anus cored out, genitals removed and part of the tongue missing. The animal was found at the bottom of a wash, and unlike a typical predator kill, there was no indication of a struggle or massive blood loss. The rancher had been raising cattle his whole life, and had seen many animal deaths, but could not explain why this animal had died. In fact, because he had a UFO sighting just days before, he suspected that the culprits could be extraterrestrial.
Originally posted by WeMoveUnseen
reply to post by redoubt
That's why i posted the video you obviously didn't watch
After looking at pictures of the remains of Harris' animal, veterinarian Dr. Kathleen Francis said she was shocked.
"Anything that could make that kind of incision took a little bit of skill," said Francis, who has been a vet for 11 years. "There was absolutely no blood anywhere around the carcass which was really weird, you know, to be able to make those kinds of cuts without losing blood somewhere on the ground."
Francis discounted predators as a possible cause of the cow's death, noting there were no bites or claw marks on the carcass. She said the bloodless wounds could mean some kind of electric cautery unit was involved.
Originally posted by PhoenixOD
reply to post by Yazman
My theory has allways been that the military is testing for radiactive contamination in the cattle.
Originally posted by Yazman
So I don't know if this has been posted or not but yeah, I saw this on the Huffington post today and thought it was interesting, about a dude who investigated the cattle mutilations and concluded that some sort of military branch must be responsible for them - even claiming he found gas masks and glow sticks at various cattle mutilation sites.
Originally posted by FurvusRexCaeli
Originally posted by Yazman
So I don't know if this has been posted or not but yeah, I saw this on the Huffington post today and thought it was interesting, about a dude who investigated the cattle mutilations and concluded that some sort of military branch must be responsible for them - even claiming he found gas masks and glow sticks at various cattle mutilation sites.
Pro-masks are accountable items. No one is going to leave a bunch of them behind when they leave their objective. It's also extremely unlikely that someone on an objective would remove a mask from its carrier and drop it or set it aside. You either put the mask on and wear it until you leave the contaminated area, or you keep it in its carrier. Nothing here convinces me the military is chopping the genitals off of dead cows and carving out their buttholes. Maybe somebody else is, but not the military.
Originally posted by Yazman
Originally posted by FurvusRexCaeli
Originally posted by Yazman
So I don't know if this has been posted or not but yeah, I saw this on the Huffington post today and thought it was interesting, about a dude who investigated the cattle mutilations and concluded that some sort of military branch must be responsible for them - even claiming he found gas masks and glow sticks at various cattle mutilation sites.
Pro-masks are accountable items. No one is going to leave a bunch of them behind when they leave their objective. It's also extremely unlikely that someone on an objective would remove a mask from its carrier and drop it or set it aside. You either put the mask on and wear it until you leave the contaminated area, or you keep it in its carrier. Nothing here convinces me the military is chopping the genitals off of dead cows and carving out their buttholes. Maybe somebody else is, but not the military.
What do you mean when you refer to a "pro-mask"? Are you referring to gas masks? Is that military slang, or a brand name or something? Just wanted to clear that up.
Originally posted by Yazman
Originally posted by PhoenixOD
reply to post by Yazman
My theory has allways been that the military is testing for radiactive contamination in the cattle.
Now that's an interesting hypothesis for sure. Where do you think the radioactive contamination would be coming from, if any? Residue from nuclear weapons testing? Byproducts in the atmosphere of uranium mining? Not sure what else could possibly cause it.