It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Wildbob77
I would like to see the government actually try to work within it's budget, not just go out and take more money from people like me.
Originally posted by hawkiye
reply to post by DZAG Wright
Government has ENABLED us the organization and security to produce everything we have.
In essence government does insure society, without government we would still have a society, but it would be Somalian. All the wrong things you cite as governmental shortcoming is due to the wrong people being allowed to have seats. Also the influence that money has on those individuals, that problem can be fixed.
What the Founders wrote merely highlights they weren't perfect as they are often praised. Yes society existed before government, but it was such chaos that mankind found it impossible to advance very far.
GOVERNMENT DOES NOT ENABLE ANYTHING except theft plunder and oppression! Somalia exist in the current state because government destroyed the more self sufficient cultures of its people then collapsed under it own weight. You are completely delusional and brain washed with Marxist tripe. You're the kind of dupe communist have used to for decades to foment revolution and genocide etc.
One of the most sophisticated societies of Europe existed 1000 years in relative peace freedom and prosperity with no government! PDF www.mises.org...
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
Originally posted by DZAG Wright
None of this is the fault of the ideology of government.
Not the ideology of the government but the ideology of those in the government. And I, for one, am tired of it.
Originally posted by DZAG Wright
So you see the way to fix your problem then? Remove those who are screwing the government up! Insert individuals who will make government function the way it was designed.
You don't trash the pistol because some idiot was shooting it in a sideways stance and missing the target. You get someone who knows what they're doing and holds it in a proper stance and watch how the pistol works just fine. It's always the handler...
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
Originally posted by DZAG Wright
So you see the way to fix your problem then? Remove those who are screwing the government up! Insert individuals who will make government function the way it was designed.
You don't trash the pistol because some idiot was shooting it in a sideways stance and missing the target. You get someone who knows what they're doing and holds it in a proper stance and watch how the pistol works just fine. It's always the handler...
Your analogy is not completely accurate. There are people diametrically opposed to my viewpoint looking to load another pistol and point it at me.
Please elevate yourself to the 21st Century. Why are you still using words such as marxist and communist...those things are history.
Correction, corrupt government enabled by corrupt individuals destroyed the self sufficient cultures of many peoples. Causing the government and society to collapse into savagery, whilst enabling the same corrupt people from the government to maintain some barbaric power.
Which is exactly what may happen in America if we allow.
A culture could exist without government 1000 years ago. They didn't have such things as aviation, national defense, oil drilling, huge corporations, brain surgery. Our society is much to advanced to exist without a government.
Originally posted by DZAG Wright
You see there is where we have to learn to swallow our ego and self righteousness. We have to realize that "our viewpoint" is the enemy of all of society and has been for eons.
At the risk of introducing partisan bickering....as common with people who identify as Conservative. They will yell they want freedom...unless you're talking about freedom for gays or to do drugs. That is hypocricy and dishonesty.
Ask anyone screaming their about freedom one of those questions or several other hot topic ones and see rather they are hypocrits.
Originally posted by hawkiye
reply to post by DZAG Wright
Please elevate yourself to the 21st Century. Why are you still using words such as marxist and communist...those things are history.
I live in the 21st century with endless war, theft, and oppression all due to government! It is you who needs to learn from history. You are a Marxist pure and simple spouting Marxist communist ideology and claming it is some modern advancement, that is why those words are relevant!
Correction, corrupt government enabled by corrupt individuals destroyed the self sufficient cultures of many peoples. Causing the government and society to collapse into savagery, whilst enabling the same corrupt people from the government to maintain some barbaric power.
Show us a time when government was not corrupt and doing all those things?
Which is exactly what may happen in America if we allow.
It has already happening due to government!
A culture could exist without government 1000 years ago. They didn't have such things as aviation, national defense, oil drilling, huge corporations, brain surgery. Our society is much to advanced to exist without a government.
You have it backwards we are much too advanced to need government or central authority of any kind. they had national defense, energy needs companies and surgery etc. The principles of freedom and self determination are timeless they worked thousands of years ago and they will work even better now. It is people thinking for themselves and using self determination that made those advancements not government, but in spite of government. Without government intervention killing innovation and entrepreneurship we would be far more advanced and not using 150 year old polluting technology for transportation and communications etc. anymore.
Socialism.
Originally posted by newcovenant
Originally posted by sonofliberty1776
reply to post by newcovenant
If you should not be forced to pay for his kids school, why should he be forced to pay for yours when his kids are not attending the same school?
RE The minimum standards: What a joke. Look at the test scores and graduation rates since the formation of the dept of education. Look at literacy rates. Be serious. The dept of education is an example of Orwellian double speak.
I have no children. Why should I be forced to pay ANY of his?
Originally posted by DZAG Wright
Trust me it makes life a lot easier for you, when you stop judging or even wanting to judge anyone else.
If we agree that only 5% should be the tax rate, well we should budget ourselves for a government that has 5% to do EVERYTHING it has too. You're probably fine with that....but will you be fine when you recognize what 5% tax rate will get us with a country of 300 million people? Will you be fine that probably most of the things our government fund will disappear, drug research, infrastructure, etc., will have to be gone.
It's why I say many do not even know what they are asking for...just whining.
Originally posted by sonofliberty1776
I agree 100% OP. I am leaving my job in a few weeks and I plan to go on unemployment and get all of the other socialist entitlements I possibly can. Between federal, state, local and property taxes I pay over 40k/year in taxes. I say ENOUGH!!! I QUIT! By the time I grab all of the benefits I can, I hope to become a net loss of 75k or more to the "system". Unless you know where I can find Galt's Gulch, I quit. I am done subsidizing the lazy.
Originally posted by sonofliberty1776
Socialism.
Originally posted by newcovenant
Originally posted by sonofliberty1776
reply to post by newcovenant
If you should not be forced to pay for his kids school, why should he be forced to pay for yours when his kids are not attending the same school?
RE The minimum standards: What a joke. Look at the test scores and graduation rates since the formation of the dept of education. Look at literacy rates. Be serious. The dept of education is an example of Orwellian double speak.
I have no children. Why should I be forced to pay ANY of his?
Originally posted by newcovenant
Originally posted by sonofliberty1776
Socialism.
Originally posted by newcovenant
Originally posted by sonofliberty1776
reply to post by newcovenant
If you should not be forced to pay for his kids school, why should he be forced to pay for yours when his kids are not attending the same school?
RE The minimum standards: What a joke. Look at the test scores and graduation rates since the formation of the dept of education. Look at literacy rates. Be serious. The dept of education is an example of Orwellian double speak.
I have no children. Why should I be forced to pay ANY of his?
Wondered why my post is recopied here without anyone adding to it?
I did say that forcing me without children, to pay any part of either a private school voucher or a public school tax is SOCIALISM.
Are you agreeing with me?
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
Keep in mind that the terminology coming from the white house, terms like "fair share" and such, are not terms used to refer to any capitalist system. They are words used to describe socialist ideals. They are phrases worded to convince people that they are doing good deeds by taking your money and giving it to someone else because hey - it's fair. Another phrase used in this manner is "common-sense". "Common-sense gun laws", "common-sense measures". That one makes me cringe because it usually means the opposite, that lawmakers are throwing common sense out the window.