It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Plishing Site found in Ads on ATS

page: 1
4

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 18 2011 @ 09:59 PM
link   
I was wandering around ats and refreshed the site on recent posts and this came up..

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/9950ab4f1116.jpg[/atsimg]

I thought you guys should be aware of it...



posted on Aug, 18 2011 @ 10:01 PM
link   
and whats with all the russian porn ads


my gf thinks im lookin at porn everytime im on here



posted on Aug, 18 2011 @ 11:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by therealcatman
and whats with all the russian porn ads


my gf thinks im lookin at porn everytime im on here


I think those are from the Ukraine if I'm not mistaken.



posted on Aug, 18 2011 @ 11:36 PM
link   
My virus scanner detected something just now as well. Nice!



posted on Aug, 18 2011 @ 11:41 PM
link   
you'll find the ads tend to reflect what you look for most.

if i have been looking at furniture, i get furniture ads...

follow the train of thought.



posted on Aug, 18 2011 @ 11:48 PM
link   
dont know about that havent looked at porn in years



posted on Aug, 18 2011 @ 11:53 PM
link   
reply to post by ThichHeaded
 


There are no ads, on any of our providers, that use assets from, or link to the domain indicated in that warning (just spend 30 minutes running searches).

However, a great many anti-malware systems never (or rarely) update blocked domains once an issue is corrected. It could be a false alarm.


But more importantly, do some research on your ISP. We're seeing an increasing amount of complaints that some regional ISPs are using deep-packet inspection to insert their own banner ads into websites you use.



posted on Aug, 19 2011 @ 12:47 AM
link   

Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
reply to post by ThichHeaded
 


There are no ads, on any of our providers, that use assets from, or link to the domain indicated in that warning (just spend 30 minutes running searches).

However, a great many anti-malware systems never (or rarely) update blocked domains once an issue is corrected. It could be a false alarm.


But more importantly, do some research on your ISP. We're seeing an increasing amount of complaints that some regional ISPs are using

deep-packet inspection to insert
their own banner ads into websites you use.


does that mean there is no choice and the ads have by default inseted themselves in between packet data?
and if so that brings the "net" onto every local computer, by default

am i correct that to be able to insert adds at that level a company could easly track and trace the entire web from user data?

the money revenue from the advertising allows deep packet insertion
lol

please tell me i have got this wrong......
xploder



posted on Aug, 19 2011 @ 12:50 AM
link   
reply to post by SkepticOverlord
 


Thanks I wanted to make you aware is all.. It came up on that page so i figured it might have been from you guys ads or something...

But its cool..



posted on Aug, 19 2011 @ 07:13 PM
link   
reply to post by ThichHeaded
 


Thanks for the heads up Mr. Bumpus



posted on Aug, 20 2011 @ 03:47 AM
link   

Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
reply to post by ThichHeaded
 


.....We're seeing an increasing amount of complaints that some regional ISPs are using deep-packet inspection to insert their own banner ads into websites you use.


Very well said.




posted on Aug, 20 2011 @ 05:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by cerebralassassins

Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
reply to post by ThichHeaded
 


.....We're seeing an increasing amount of complaints that some regional ISPs are using deep-packet inspection to insert their own banner ads into websites you use.


Very well said.



Not so well said.


What is "deep-packet inspection"? Do you have a clue as to what you are talking about?

Either they are inspecting your packets or they are not, there is no such thing as "deep-packet inspection". If the MSM says otherwise they are just as clueless.

Ever use SNORT or Wireshark? If you have not I suggest you do......if only to monitor your persona network traffic.



posted on Aug, 20 2011 @ 05:59 AM
link   
reply to post by mileysubet
 


._ snort..that is something like a decade old combo...and i do realize that such talk beyond the constructive level of interaction is not allowed here so for obvious reasons ill simply lol or lulz as to the snort.

As for deep packet, well assuming you work or have direct access to isp hubs then what i replied to was exactly what the person i quote mentioned. I am no super geek uber cyber trooper who has no lifez. But then again such topics are anything but and avoided at all costs especially on a site that is way above visited by thousands. So in closing, there are those who assume and there are those who know and there are those who refuse to be both, simply do not assume is the key word here.



posted on Aug, 20 2011 @ 06:16 PM
link   
I get advertisements for food and books. Yes I'm a fatty. I've never had anything go off on this website before. Hmm. Strange.



posted on Aug, 20 2011 @ 10:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by godfather420
reply to post by ThichHeaded
 


Thanks for the heads up Mr. Bumpus


How does one prevent "deep pocket inspection"?
Is there a method on the web browser?



posted on Aug, 20 2011 @ 11:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by mileysubet
there is no such thing as "deep-packet inspection".

Actually, there is.

Normal "packet inspection" simply catalogs the sites you see and the people with whom you exchange email.

"Deep packet inspection" involves taking that step further by parsing the TCP/IP packets to determine actual content. Once that's determined, a JavaScript tag (in this case) can be exchanged on the fly with one of their own as the ISP sends you the HTML of the web page.



new topics

top topics



 
4

log in

join