Christine O'Donnell Walks Off Piers Morgan Interview

Originally posted by ModernAcademia
Because she has ovaries?
No, insulting them because of their lipstick, makeup or anything cosmetic, things like that
I don't see anyone making fun of male politicians and their ties or belts

You want to attack the intelligence of women, then go ahead and attack their individual INTELLIGENCE
Without talking about their lips, makeup or having a date with a vampire along time ago.

Do you understand now?
Attacking someone's argument is staying on topic despite the gender of the opposition

If you need further explanation i'm here to help

Originally posted by ModernAcademia
Again, liberals insulting women for being women
This happens WAYYYYYY too often

I don't think liberals care about women or equality, they only care about them feeling like they are right and everyone else is wrong, it's like having a Rachel Madcow disease.

Why don't you guys just keep talking about her looks and makeup, that'll really stick it to the establishment won't it.

Oh, I get it...its OK when YOU do it to marginlize the thoughts you dont agree with. ATS is just full of hypocrites. Allright, we are done here.

She's like Palin's mini-me

To be honest, I never heard of Christine O'Donnell before this thread. But it seems to me an "interview" on a talk show is a two-way street, not just "Let me outline my whole platform for sixty minutes and please don't interrupt with any questions". I almost feel sorry for the tea party, who obviously was her target audience.

Originally posted by MrXYZ
She's like Palin's mini-me

Seriously!

Palin - Bachmann - O'Donnell seem to be pushing their "look" more then their brains.

I heard Bachmann left the stage several times in the debate to check her makeup.

It seems pretty understandable that some make fun of them for it.

reply to post by hotbread


It seems the topic is wandering a bit.
The original op was the video of this woman walking off the show.

It doesn't matter whether you like the host or not. Or if you don't like this lady or not.

I didn't read her book nor do I intend to. However from the interview I gather that the host read the book and was asking her questions about the book. Things that she wrote about.

Curiously enough she keeps stating that she only wants to talk about the book. However the host is asking her about stuff she wrote in there. But she doesn't want to talk about those parts. Which in itself raises some curious questions about why she doesn't want to speak about it.
Why is she deflecting?

reply to post by hotbread


We all knew she was an idiot. This kinda' sums it up (you betcha', wink,wink).

doesn't want to have the whole light shed on her, she best needs to go back to the kitchen

reply to post by ModernAcademia


You've never seen anyone make fun of male politicians for their looks. Really. You must not get out much.

Originally posted by dolphinfan
reply to post by hotbread

 

She planned to walk off the show. This is her last two minutes of the 15 in fame that she is going to get and she's seeking to make dough on the book which is likely the only time she will have to make potentially serious dough in her life.

Nobody who watches CNN is going to buy her book. She is a right-wing loon and a half-witted loon at that and having her walk off the hated CNN will feed the boneheads who are actually foolish enough to open their wallets to buy the book. In their minds it makes her more of a true warrior

He was not rude. I don't like the dude because I think he's a weak interviewer, but he certainly was not rude. She is an odd and controversial figure and there are items related to her personality, views and life that are controversial and are absolutely the kinds of things a professional interviewer would ask.

.

Ditto! I didn't know anything about Christine O'Donnell, until now.en.wikipedia.org...'Donnell

Originally posted by grey580
reply to post by hotbread

 

It seems the topic is wandering a bit.
The original op was the video of this woman walking off the show.

It doesn't matter whether you like the host or not. Or if you don't like this lady or not.

I didn't read her book nor do I intend to. However from the interview I gather that the host read the book and was asking her questions about the book. Things that she wrote about.

Curiously enough she keeps stating that she only wants to talk about the book. However the host is asking her about stuff she wrote in there. But she doesn't want to talk about those parts. Which in itself raises some curious questions about why she doesn't want to speak about it.
Why is she deflecting?

Probably, because it could hurt her chances of winning any public office. She has run for the Senate at least 3 times. She believes in abstinence before marriage, creationism taught in school and not evolution. She has a very strict sense of right and wrong and is deeply into religious dogma.


[Quote]As she explained to the Wilmington News Journal in 2004, she did "things she regrets" in college, such as drinking to excess and becoming somewhat sexually promiscuous. Those regrets spurred her to promote chaste values, and to seek out a national forum to advance related policy aims such as abstinence education.[/Quote]

news.yahoo.com...

Originally posted by hotbread
Was he rude? I don't think so.
Was she weird? no, she is stupid.

WOW!!!

I am in love

Originally posted by Annee

Originally posted by MrXYZ
She's like Palin's mini-me

Seriously!

Palin - Bachmann - O'Donnell seem to be pushing their "look" more then their brains.

I heard Bachmann left the stage several times in the debate to check her makeup.

It seems pretty understandable that some make fun of them for it.

How can you push something that is not there?

Clearly the retarded, vulturess look, more than suffices for intellectual prowess in some parts!

This is the same woman who introduced herself as "not a witch" in her campaign advertisements for governor and "dabbled into witchcraft and satanism" with a boyfriend in the late '90s. She's an idiot. Piers couldn't have been less rude than he was in this interview.

reply to post by hotbread


In my opinion that is what he gets for having her on the show to begin with. She is irrelavent and what she thinks should be irrevalent. Piers must be scaping the bottom to find someone to interview.

reply to post by spinalremain


Maybe he should have asked her "How is your gay sister doing these days?" I wonder if she would have answered that.

reply to post by ModernAcademia


I think you are confusing liberals with conservatives. Liberals "don't care about women or equality"?

reply to post by TheWalkingFox

You've never seen anyone make fun of male politicians for their looks. Really. You must not get out much.

Nothing but kind words usually said about Pelosi and botox.

Have never heard a comment that all liberal women are ugly...definitely not.

lol methinks this thread has become

much ado about nothing

who cares what some bubblehead "thinks", wrote, said, or did.

OH!!! Christine O'Donnell had a brain fart on Piers Morgan Interview and threw a hissy fit

now if one of these deviants somehow managed to get elected...

politicians... meh

Originally posted by LooksLikeWeMadeIt
reply to post by Kitilani

 

speaking as "a lib" I need to correct your comment. we are NOT afraid of chicks like O'Donnell, Palin & Bachmann. what we are afraid of is our fellow Americans on the right seem to take these mental midgets seriously. it's like, are you kidding me / us? you would let these women have the keys to our government? I'd be afraid to let them cook breakfast. since we can't stand there and give each and everyone on the right a good head smack we have to use our collective voice to dismantle the facade that the right has woven around these females.

I think you need to read my comment all over again.

Originally posted by grey580
reply to post by hotbread

 

It seems the topic is wandering a bit.
The original op was the video of this woman walking off the show.

It doesn't matter whether you like the host or not. Or if you don't like this lady or not.

I didn't read her book nor do I intend to. However from the interview I gather that the host read the book and was asking her questions about the book. Things that she wrote about.

Curiously enough she keeps stating that she only wants to talk about the book. However the host is asking her about stuff she wrote in there. But she doesn't want to talk about those parts. Which in itself raises some curious questions about why she doesn't want to speak about it.
Why is she deflecting?

I think that really sums it up best right there.