It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Kharron
..
Originally posted by DaMod
You know my favorite answer there was in re: to Iran...
Israel as 300 nukes.. Iran isn't suicidal!!
And he's right.. Iran nuking Israel would be suicide...
Exactly... I have to think and weigh options when thinking about whether Iran would even nuke Israel.
I have NO doubt that Israel with nuke Iran. It's pretty clear they would exterminate all Iranians if given the chance. And I'm afraid Iran is not alone in that boat.
Khar
Originally posted by Zoyd23
reply to post by Kharron
No doubt Isreal would nuke Iran, eh? Perhaps if Iran said they wanted to destroy Israel, then Israel would nuke Iran. Oh, wait.....Iran has publicly threatened to destroy Israel several times. What is Israel waiting for?
Originally posted by Bramble Iceshimmer
reply to post by galactictuan
Well, this whole Ron Paul 2012 sounds so much like the "I like Ike" movement of yesteryear. Although Paul and Eisenhower share some similar beliefs, Ron Paul is no war hero like Ike and while Iraq and Afghanistan are bad they are no Korean War. I don't believe he will sell well to mainstream America.
Originally posted by Kitilani
Originally posted by slowisfast
reply to post by RoguePhilosopher
what are you talking about?
ron paul didn't 'just appear'
he's been towing this line since he first got to congress in the 70's.
he's ran for president before. multiple times.
and never came anywhere close to winning.
But hey, this time it will be different boy, you betcha. He has a new suit and a nice new haircut. Things are looking up for old Gil. The wind is at his back. Even though he has run and run and run and run and run and never come close, hey this time is going to be different!
Not very well they took our whole economy hostage. just so they can focus the attention to a issue they did not fix
Originally posted by haarvik
For those of you who say Ron Paul isn't electable, just remember, it was only two years ago they said the Tea Party members were unelectable because they were too fringe. How did that work out?
I'm confused. If you really think he'll be asassinated, wouldn't you want to make sure he wasn't elected? Wouldn't it be better to let him stay in Congress, write, and give speeches?
Originally posted by DaMod
You know my favorite answer there was in re: to Iran...
Israel as 300 nukes.. Iran isn't suicidal!!
And he's right.. Iran nuking Israel would be suicide...