It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy is promoting a bill to suspend U.S. assistance to three elite Israel Defense Forces units, alleging they are involved in human rights violations in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
Leahy, a Democrat and senior member of the U.S. Senate, wants assistance withheld from the Israel Navy's Shayetet 13 unit, the undercover Duvdevan unit and the Israel Air Force's Shaldag unit
Thirteen reservist soldiers and officers in the elite Sayeret Matkal unit of the Israel Defense Forces on Sunday evening signed a letter declaring their refusal to serve in the territories.
We say to you today, we will no longer give our hands to the oppressive reign in the territories and the denial of human rights to millions of Palestinians," reads the letter addressed to the prime minister, " and we will no longer serve as a defensive shield for the settlement enterprise."
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by Peruvianmonk
He will be labeled an anti Semite and will have a change of heart.
It's nice to hear about these things, but the aid to Israel stays. I believe all this publicity about this lately is nothing more than theatrics.
U.S. report recommends ending loan guarantees to Israel at end of 2011
I hope this guy doesn't have an accident or overdose or get found with prostitutes.
Originally posted by the owlbear
I think the big question is with all of the economic woes the US has, why are we supporting commando units of another nation?
Originally posted by RTGREAT
Originally posted by the owlbear
I think the big question is with all of the economic woes the US has, why are we supporting commando units of another nation?
Hmmm... extremely complicated question... for the rocket scientist really... but I will try anyway:
Might US support has something to do with pro Israeli lobby in Washington D.C.???
A spokesman for Sen. Patrick Leahy, David Carle, emails to take issue with an article in Ha'aretz suggesting that Leahy was moving to cut off funds for Israeli troops implicated in human rights abuses in Gaza: Senator Leahy does not discuss private conversations he has had for decades with Israeli leaders. However, the Haaretz article contains significant inaccuracies. He has not proposed legislation to withhold U.S. aid to units of the Israel Defense Forces.
By way of general background about the Leahy Amendment, the law applies to U.S. aid to foreign security forces around the globe and is intended to be applied consistently across the spectrum of U.S. military aid abroad. Under the law the State Department is responsible for evaluations and enforcement decisions and over the years Senator Leahy has pressed for faithful and consistent application of the law. That is: The law isn't aimed at Israel, but Leahy won't shrink from having it enforced against Israeli troops.
Originally posted by TXRabbit
OK folks.
Now taking bets on how long before this guy flip-flops on his request and succumbs to AIPAC-led pressure.
Polls Open NOW
(I say 4 days)
They ALWAYS say that !!
Israeli officials said the assailants had crossed into Israel from Egypt’s Sinai peninsula, but insisted there was “clear intelligence information” that they originally hailed from the Gaza Strip. [color=limegreen]“The source of the terror acts is Gaza, and we will act against them with full force and determination,” said Ehud Barak, the defence minister. There was no claim of responsibility from any group in Gaza or Egypt.
But of course, that's only if they're not busy blowing each other's heads off !! $$$$
The New York Times published an editorial on Sunday criticizing the expected vote on Palestinian statehood at the United Nations in September, saying its “consequences could be profoundly damaging for all involved.”......
It argued only direct talks between Israel and the Palestinians could effectively revive the peace process. The best way of achieving such an outcome, it said, was for Washington to present a new outline for talks between the two with the backing of the international community.