It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by PunchingBag80
Looks like Information Commisioner Christopher Graham has a little bit more explaining to do. He's the only link to these secret information stealing groups.
hristopher Graham became Information Commissioner in June 2009. The Information Commissioner is appointed by HM The Queen and has independent status reporting directly to Parliament, with a range of responsibilities under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, the Data Protection Act 1998 and related laws. The functions of the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) include promoting good practice, ruling on complaints and taking regulatory action Christopher’s career began at the BBC as a radio and TV journalist. Most recently he has been: Director General of the Advertising Standards Authority Chairman of the European Advertising Standards Alliance; and Secretary of the BBC
Originally posted by petrus4
reply to post by EvanB
There are two very simple things that anyone who is concerned about reducing their traceability (at least on a daily basis) can do.
1) Do not own a mobile phone. I don't own one. My mother bought me one which I used for a brief period of time, but the charger was misplaced, and I got rid of it. I do have a laptop, but it is old, and very rarely used.
I consider the cellular phone to be a genuinely evil form of technology, to be honest. They can be tracked to within 10 meters, anywhere on the planet, and although different phones vary, their levels of microwave radiation are known to often be carcinogenic. In addition, they generate very large amounts of non-recyclable rubbish, when teenagers throw away a phone that may still be perfectly functional, in order to get a more recent one, so as to maintain social acceptability.
I don't care who you are, or what your life is like; do not reply to this, telling me that you need a mobile phone. You do not. Payphones to a certain extent still exist, and Internet cafes are everywhere. If your reasons for feeling that you "need" a mobile phone have anything to do with social acceptability, then I have no sympathy for you whatsoever.
2) Use cash, rather than ATMs, EFTpos, or credit cards. Cards now have RFID chips in them which are trackable at range. They're not the dermal off-chip that Norman Rockefeller would like us all to have, but they'll do for the time being. Every time you make an EFTpos transaction, your point of location is tracked and recorded.
If you get all of your money out of an ATM at once, then that location is still recorded, yes; but none of your other movements that would otherwise be digitally recorded via the card, can be. If they want to know where you've been from your cash purchases, they will then likely need to go through analogue records. This is one of the main reasons why they don't like cash, and why they're trying to discourage everyone from using it.
Because I'm unemployed, I'm unable to get a credit card anyway; but I've always had a policy that if I don't have the cash for something, I don't get it. Most people don't have the basic integrity, maturity, or discipline to be able to apply such a rule to their own lives, and will also likely attack me for adhering to it as well.
Always remember, that in order to rule over you, the elite always have to take advantage of some negative characteristic of your nature. Your greed, your desire for convenience, your unwillingness to think, your laziness, your craving for superficiality and social acceptance, your indifference. Virtue is therefore your best defense; if you work to eliminate all of these characteristics as much as possible, you will greatly reduce the hold the elite can have on you.edit on 13-8-2011 by petrus4 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by EvanB
Well I red through most of that.
To be honest.
Who cares?
I don't have much to hide. My views are quite vocal, and really, you as the consumer should recognize that electronics such in terms of security. Plain and simple.
Either speak in code or, God forbid, get our of the house and speak in person.edit on 14-8-2011 by Gorman91 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
Well I think privacy shouldn't exist beyond the bedroom. It's really the only way to have a successful culture that calls out its own faults and fights them. I'd favor no privacy at all for leaders. I'd prefer a scale. The higher up you go in society, the less privacy you have. With the president more or less living in a glass house, so to speak.
That's what I would love to see.