It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Quote from : Wikipedia : Snipe Hunt
A snipe hunt, a form of wild-goose chase that is also known as a fool's errand, is a type of practical joke that involves experienced people making fun of credulous newcomers by giving them an impossible or imaginary task.
The origin of the term is a practical joke where inexperienced campers are told about a bird or animal called the snipe as well as a usually preposterous method of catching it, such as running around the woods carrying a bag or making strange noises such as banging rocks together.
Incidentally, the snipe (a family of shorebirds) is difficult to catch for experienced hunters, so much so that the word "sniper" is derived from it to refer to anyone skilled enough to shoot one.
A wild goose chase can also be more serious, either a deliberate attempt to thwart opponents by sending them off on a quest based on misinformation, or a mistake on one's own part leading to a hopeless quest.
Quote from : Wikipedia : False-Flag
False flag (aka Black Flag) operations are covert operations designed to deceive the public in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities.
The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is flying the flag of a country other than one's own.
False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and can be used in peace-time.
Quote from : Wikipedia : Chinese Whispers
In the game variously known as Chinese whispers, telephone, grapevine, broken telephone, whisper down the lane, Развален телефон (Bulgarian for broken telephone) gossip, secret message, Le téléphone arabe (French for "Arab phone"), Stille Post (German for "Silent Post"), Gioco del Telefono (Italian for "Telephone Game"), Telefono senza fili (Italian for "Cordless Phone"), Telefone sem fio (Portuguese for "Cordless Phone"), Głuchy telefon (Polish for "deaf telephone"), Telefonul fără fir (Romanian for "Cordless Phone"), Испорченный телефон (Russian for "damaged telephone") and pass the message, the first player whispers a phrase or sentence to the next player.
Each player successively whispers what that player believes he or she heard to the next. The last player announces the statement to the entire group. Errors typically accumulate in the retellings, so the statement announced by the last player differs significantly, and often amusingly, from the one uttered by the first. Some players also deliberately alter what is being said in order to guarantee a changed message by the end of it. The game is often played by children as a party game or in the playground. It is often invoked as a metaphor for cumulative error, especially the inaccuracies as rumours or gossip spread, or, more generally, for the unreliability of human recollection.
In the United States, "telephone" is the most common name for the game. The name "Chinese whispers" reflects the former stereotype in Europe of the Chinese language as being incomprehensible. It is little-used in the United States and may be considered offensive.However, it remains the common British English name for the game.
Amazon Review :
Spycatcher: The Candid Autobiography of a Senior Intelligence Officer (also Spycatcher), is a book written by Peter Wright, former MI5 officer and Assistant Director, and co-author Paul Greengrass.
It was published first in Australia.
Its allegations proved scandalous on publication, but more so because the British Government attempted to ban it, ensuring its profit and notoriety.
Amazon Review :
If the experts could point to any single book as a starting point for understanding the subject of intelligence from the late twentieth century to today, that single book would be Allen W. Dulles's The Craft of Intelligence. This classic of spycraft is based on Allen Dulles's incomparable experience as a diplomat, international lawyer, and America's premier intelligence officer. Dulles was a high-ranking officer of the CIA's predecessor-the Office of Strategic Services-and was present at the inception of the CIA, where he served eight of his ten years there as director.
Here he sums up what he learned about intelligence from nearly a half-century of experience in foreign affairs. In World War II his OSS agents penetrated the German Foreign Office, worked with the anti-Nazi underground resistance, and established contacts that brought about the Nazi military surrender in North Italy. Under his direction the CIA developed both a dedicated corps of specialists and a whole range of new intelligence devices, from the U-2 high-altitude photographic plane to minute electronic listening and transmitting equipment. Dulles reveals much about how intelligence is collected and processed, and how the resulting estimates contribute to the formation of national policy.
He discusses methods of surveillance, and the usefulness of defectors from hostile nations. His knowledge of Soviet espionage techniques is unrivaled, and he explains how the Soviet State Security Service recruited operatives and planted "illegals" in foreign countries. He spells out not only the techniques of modern espionage but also the philosophy and role of intelligence in a free society threatened by global conspiracies.
Dulles also addresses the Bay of Pigs incident, denying that the 1961 invasion was based on a CIA estimate that a popular Cuban uprising would ensue. This account is enlivened with a wealth of personal anecdotes. It is a book for readers who seek wider understanding of the contribution of intelligence to our national security.
Amazon Review :
At first glance, this title is just another entry in the roster of books opposed to political correctness at American universities, yet it's surprisingly good--certainly the best of its type since Dinesh D'Souza's Illiberal Education appeared in 1991.
Kors and Silverglate are hard-core civil libertarians turned off by the "hidden, systematic assault upon liberty, individualism, dignity, due process, and equality before the law" that they describe as rampant on campuses.
Theirs is not so much a brief against academic multiculturalism, but an eye-opening narrative about how the modern university "hands students a moral agenda upon arrival, subjects them to mandatory political reeducation, sends them to sensitivity training, submerges their individuality in official group identity, intrudes upon private conscience, treats them with scandalous inequality, and, when it chooses, suspends or expels them."
Through well-told stories and anecdotes (including an excellent chapter-long sketch of the University of Pennsylvania's semi-famous "water buffalo" incident), Kors and Silverglate make their case and make it well. --John J. Miller --
Publishers Weekly : Amazon Review :
Gardner, a columnist and senior writer for the Ottawa Citizen, is both matter-of-fact and entertaining in this look at fear and how it shapes our lives. Although we are capable of reason, says Gardner, we often rely instead on intuitive snap judgments. We also assume instinctively, but incorrectly, that if examples of something can be recalled easily, that thing must be common.
And what is more memorable than headlines and news programs blaring horrible crimes and diseases, plane crashes and terrorist attacks? In fact, such events are rare, but their media omnipresence activates a gut-level fear response that is out of proportion to the likelihood of our going through such an event. It doesn't help that scientific data and statistics are often misunderstood and misused and that our risk assessment is influenced less by the facts than by how others respond.
Gardner's vivid, direct style, backed up by clear examples and solid data from science and psychology, brings a breath of fresh air and common sense to an emotional topic. (June) Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Originally posted by Cassius666
Politicians werent "name dropping". In 1991, in the aftermath of the fall of the soviet empire, speaking of a new world order was kinda appropriate.
Originally posted by HappilyEverAfter
Strip it all down Spart, to the bare bones, What are you saying ....directly!
That in your opinion there is no 'elite', 'agenda', design of a select by a select?
Because if youre saying that then we're not seeing the same active canvas.
Originally posted by HappilyEverAfter
Strip it all down Spart, to the bare bones, What are you saying ....directly!
That in your opinion there is no 'elite', 'agenda', design of a select by a select?
Because if youre saying that then we're not seeing the same active canvas.
Originally posted by godfather420
reply to post by SpartanKingLeonidas
You can call it want you want. Sure you can't find an office or a phone number to contact the NWO. But that doesn't change the fact that we have money manipulators with endless amounts of wealth and resources, consolidating even more wealth resources and power into their own hands for a broader agenda. That agenda doesn't include the well-being of you or anyone else but themselves.
Originally posted by godfather420
I've only been doing this for 1 decade as opposed to 3, and it doesn't take a genious to figure out what is really going on in government and with geo-politics. No S&F because I think this thread indirectly supports their globalist agenda, and it is actually quite sickening that some people are not only not fighting against this one world government movement, but some even try to justify and make it sound like the norm. Something naturally occuring. Where this is not the case.
Originally posted by godfather420
You're entitled to your opinion though.
Originally posted by godfather420
The more of these trends I see I realize that everything has gone so far for so long there is no figthing back.
Originally posted by godfather420
They've won.
Originally posted by HappilyEverAfter
I understand the 'snipe hunt example' but you've lost me on this one.
Originally posted by HappilyEverAfter
That the goal, the agenda itself, is a passed on legacy, a family trust, and is part of their family core belief system.
Originally posted by HappilyEverAfter
I believe they are bored and mentally ill and that their perversions are as equally dark as their souls,
I believe with their enormous wealth that they purchase influence and control and have now over an extended period of time purchased everything; they own the media to directly pump into the worlds conscience whatever direction or propaganda they desire, they own the banks to move and control the failure or success of nations, states, and individuals, they own the drugs to make you sick or make you better, they own the governments (except a few) and the ones they dont own are sold to us as evil or rogue, they own the past through suppressed knowledge and they own the future through suppressed invention and knowledge,
I believe they are very real, they are very far removed from the average persons daily lifestyle and that they wear the layers of an onion on purpose but unlike an onion they are very solid.
Originally posted by HappilyEverAfter
Layer upon layer of corporation, and corporate expense, of government and government expense shares a strand of their woven web.
Originally posted by HappilyEverAfter
There may be some who deny or are convinced that there is no 'order' to the new world order, or that there is no new world order at all, and I would say to them;
The snipe hunt is an action, it is an act, which occupies, controls, and consumes not only your resources, your time, your direction, your energy, your thoughts, your state of mind, but more importantly, it controls the truth and your life and what is happening to you and yours.
Originally posted by HappilyEverAfter
If you require more evidence of problem - reaction - solution than that, if you cannot see the obvious multigenerational extended longterm gameplan, if you cant see the 'order' and 'organization' in the nwo,
I dont believe it.
Originally posted by godfather420
reply to post by SpartanKingLeonidas
Like I said, call it what you want. A "game" or a "snipe hunt".
The fact is this so called "game" is being played in a very real world, and alot of good people are getting hurt in the process and it needs to stop.
Yes this thread does "indirectly" support their agenda because its more mind games. I'm not saying that was your intention but what is it exactly you're trying to say here? There's nothing to worry about its just how things work? Please tell me.
Originally posted by havok
I only respectfully disagree, Sir.
All this is in my humble opinion, of course.
Originally posted by havok
Because in so much as people think there is a NEW WORLD ORDER...
There really is a "new" way that will eventually take over.
Originally posted by havok
But in reality, there is a "new" world order.
Because the "old" world order has been dismantled, destroyed, etc...
Originally posted by havok
This "new" world order is globalization.
Quote from : Destron Fearing Website
Destron Fearing is a global leader in innovative animal identification.
With presence in over 40 countries worldwide we seek to provide real world ID solutions to match the ever increasing complexity and opportunities related to animal identification.
Since 1945 we have provided innovative products addressing the needs of livestock producers, companion animal owners, horse owners, wildlife managers and government agencies.
Full complement of radio frequency identification products and software solutions
Destron Fearing provides a full complement of radio frequency identification products and software solutions to automate the collection of critical livestock production and carcass information.
Individual and herd information can then be easily transferred between all parties involved in the production and retail of meat products.
Information sharing allows the food industry to meet the discriminating demands of the market place.
Originally posted by havok
Or one global enterprise, which is being systematically intergrated as we speak.
The "old" world order ended as soon as America spread herself globally.
Either in the name of democracy, or for corporate capitalism, whatever you want to call it.
Originally posted by havok
The "old" world order involved borders, isolationism, and countries providing for just themselves.
Basically it ended since the inception of a League of Nations, or United Nations...i.e., after WWII.
This "new" world order involves nations trading between nations, and global economies.
A "new" way of governance...
Novus Ordo Seclorum.
New order of the ages.
It's here or in my mind it is being slowly implemented.
It is a new order of world government.
Not separate governments ruling just their own citizens.
Every leader has said it.
They believe there should be a unified world government.
So how is it not a "new" world order, if the "old" order has been dismissed?
Originally posted by godfather420
reply to post by SpartanKingLeonidas
Like I said, call it what you want. A "game" or a "snipe hunt".
The fact is this so called "game" is being played in a very real world, and alot of good people are getting hurt in the process and it needs to stop.
Yes this thread does "indirectly" support their agenda because its more mind games. I'm not saying that was your intention but what is it exactly you're trying to say here? There's nothing to worry about its just how things work? Please tell me.
"a student in the humanities has constantly before him a number of competing and incommensurable solutions to these problems, solutions that he must ultimately examine for himself ."
The WTO and Global Governance: Future Directions
UNITED NATIONS UNIVERSITY
The World Trade Organisation (WTO) is mandated by governments to achieve full employment, a steady growth in real income, and higher standards of living for its 150 plus member countries. It’s role is also to ensure the optimal use of the world’s resources in accordance with sustainable development. As a result, the WTO has greatly extended its reach into non-traditional areas of trade policy. This has taken place against the reality that the WTO is only part of a more global structure of international agreements with overlapping objectives and commitments, many of which now find their place on centre-stage at the WTO.
These commitments serve to shape domestic policy choices and constitute a principal feature of global governance. The WTO has a principal role to play in determining the borderline between domestic policy choices and international commitments....
...the very incarnation of an international organization of integration in which Member States have agreed to relinquish sovereignty in order to strengthen the coherence and effectiveness of their actions.
...If there is one place on earth where new forms of global governance have been tested since the Second World War, it is in Europe. European integration is the most ambitious supranational governance experience ever undertaken. It is the story of interdependence desired, defined, and organized by the Member States. In no respect is the work complete—neither geographically nor in terms of depth (i.e., the powers conferred by the Member States to the E.U.), nor, obviously, in terms of identity....
Our challenge today is to establish a system of global governance that provides a better balance between leadership, effectiveness, and legitimacy on the one hand, and coherence on the other...