It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SemperFish
reply to post by GonzoSinister
yeah poverty! this is not the same as simply receiving low wages.
I think it is you who doesnt get it.
When you have a thought and want to represent it in words, I suggest you chose the correct words. You are clearly thinking one thing and then typing something completely different.
Oh and yeah of course, this has to be all about me and my issues doesnt it?
Cant be because you are making glaring assumptions without any basis or intelligent thought.
Originally posted by SemperFish
reply to post by GonzoSinister
yeah poverty! this is not the same as simply receiving low wages.
I think it is you who doesnt get it.
When you have a thought and want to represent it in words, I suggest you chose the correct words. You are clearly thinking one thing and then typing something completely different.
Oh and yeah of course, this has to be all about me and my issues doesnt it?
Cant be because you are making glaring assumptions without any basis or intelligent thought.
Originally posted by rigel4
reply to post by GonzoSinister
low wages or not , when your working and on a low wage, you are contributing, you have a life, and most of all you have your self respect.
Many many people on benefits are there by choice... TRUE
Originally posted by SemperFish
reply to post by GonzoSinister
What you are saying is just laughable, and you try to justify it with your little throw away comment about knowing people from the wrong sides of the track....
If you were any more transparent, you would barely exist at all.
A thinly veiled attack on the unemployed and those in receipt of benefit.
Originally posted by GonzoSinister
Originally posted by rigel4
reply to post by GonzoSinister
low wages or not , when your working and on a low wage, you are contributing, you have a life, and most of all you have your self respect.
Many many people on benefits are there by choice... TRUE
i know!!! i totally agree! this was not the point im making...
quite simply this is all about.. the area that people were rioting from have a low income.. or on benefits... im not saying being on benefits is right...
im just trying to clear up why the OP asked why you didnt see the issues in Scotland Ireland or wales when they have by percent the lowest wages (and high benefit claims) in the UK
and im just trying to make the poster who wants to argue that it has nothing to do with low wages to understand that it has been clearly stated by those who were rioting (some with jobs some without) that this has been because they felt they could get things and they have nothing!!
with the evidence before you... people without money, either on benefits or with a low income rioting because they are poor comparitivley to those around them, it stands to reason you would expect to see this all across the UK as there are areas with a much larger poor to wealth and employed to unemployed ration than manchester and london!
i know in most case (or a high percentage) people dont make an effort to get of the dole, but thats for another thread!
Originally posted by thedoctorswife
reply to post by GonzoSinister
I work hard and also recieve some benefits, i worked 20 years full time and paid my fair share of income tax, all i wanted to know was why people thought that there were the same problems with riots in the celtic countries but theres still time i suppose.
but hey if theres no rioting in these places at least we can find our fair share of fighting on ATS.
Originally posted by SemperFish
Originally posted by GonzoSinister
Originally posted by rigel4
reply to post by GonzoSinister
low wages or not , when your working and on a low wage, you are contributing, you have a life, and most of all you have your self respect.
Many many people on benefits are there by choice... TRUE
i know!!! i totally agree! this was not the point im making...
quite simply this is all about.. the area that people were rioting from have a low income.. or on benefits... im not saying being on benefits is right...
im just trying to clear up why the OP asked why you didnt see the issues in Scotland Ireland or wales when they have by percent the lowest wages (and high benefit claims) in the UK
and im just trying to make the poster who wants to argue that it has nothing to do with low wages to understand that it has been clearly stated by those who were rioting (some with jobs some without) that this has been because they felt they could get things and they have nothing!!
with the evidence before you... people without money, either on benefits or with a low income rioting because they are poor comparitivley to those around them, it stands to reason you would expect to see this all across the UK as there are areas with a much larger poor to wealth and employed to unemployed ration than manchester and london!
i know in most case (or a high percentage) people dont make an effort to get of the dole, but thats for another thread!
I never said it was not about low wages, I said it was not ALL about low wages. It really is pointless for you to construct long winded lengthy walls of text defending your position if you fail to adequately comprehend other peoples replies...
Originally posted by SemperFish
Have they? really? how many have you spoken to? Perhaps you read a few comments in the newspapers or watched an interview on t.v? Does this mean that this is the collective voice of the thousands of rioters? They have spoken have they? and they have said it is all down to money?
The poster above gave a more reasonable description. In my opinion there are many factors, and I dont proclaim to have enough information or be in a position to be able to give a definitive answer. There are not simple solutions.
However I will continue to deny ignorance in its many forms.