It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Raist
reply to post by juleol
You think notes passed in class did not often have a very private message in them?
I never said you did defend him. I was just reminding you that he helped steal a car. Since we are looking at crimes I would say the car theft outweighs his cell phone text being read. If it were my kid he would have more to worry about than other people being mad at him because he would not leave the house until he was 18.
Raist
Originally posted by mustangill
reply to post by Helious
HA, You haven't been in a school in a long time have you now? These schools have their own police department inside them. They have their own rules, their own laws and they just about can do whatever they want and get away with it.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
But by all means, sue the school and ignore the criminals stealing the cars.
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Originally posted by Xcathdra
But by all means, sue the school and ignore the criminals stealing the cars.
Nice hyperbole. Where does it say that the kid stole a car? The article makes it actually pretty clear that he was not involved.edit on 13/8/2011 by PsykoOps because: (no reason given)
Principle goes through cell phone = grab the torches and pitchforks
Kid involved with people who are stealing cars = not even mentioned / concerned about affiliation.
Originally posted by juleol
Since when was it legal for school to read private messages??
The kid would not be in this position if he were not hanging around the kids who stole the car.
Originally posted by PsykoOps
reply to post by Xcathdra
Where does it say they ignore the criminals who steal the cars? In fact the article states the exact opposite ffs.