It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by daskakik
reply to post by rwfresh
When you want to get a messege across you don't use figurative language you try to be as straight forward as possible. You can't wax poetic or talk in parables and then blame the intended receiver for not understanding the information.
What you call gibberish is an example of how they could have gotten the messege across even with terms of that time. It has nothing to do with how the actual tech works. It's funny that a description that is closer to how biometrics works is gibberish but the way it's described in revelations is crystal clear and leaves no doubt.
A database is a compilation of data so yes a written registry in the form of a book is a database.
I insist that the bible says that the mark must be a physical modification because that is what it actually says. Any speculation on your part is just that, speculation.
edit on 18-8-2011 by daskakik because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by daskakik
reply to post by rwfresh
My example is to show that a clearer messege could have been offered to the person having the vision so that the messege would have been closer to what biometrics is. In my versión he sees a book and describes a book. He sees everything as I wrote and those reading it in modern times would find similarities instead of having to do linguistic gymnastics to change "taking a picture" to "being marked on the forehead" or "taking someones fingerprints" to "a hand that now bears the mark".
There's no convincing you. You think your on to something. Actually I'm trying to show whoever comes across this thread where you are wrong. Sorry about that but it is the sites motto.