It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Turkenstein
reply to post by -W1LL
There are very few conspiracy theories that I believe in. 1) JFK was executed by proponents of our government and I truly feel Bush Sr. had a direct hand in it. 2) 9-11 was executed by proponents of our government with bush Sr. (and company) had a direct hand in. 3) Obama is not a natural born American and his election was an executed plan by TPTB, which I am sure Bush Sr. would have had knowledge of seeing how he was the CIA director (not immediately) after #1. There is one common link in these three attrocities and my only question is, WHY does bush Sr. hate America (or love money) so much that he is willing to ruin it for all of us "undeserveds?" [/quot
A kinder gentler Nazi Germany .....he doesn't hate America trust me. We are cousins with Rome and Nazi Germany(ashkeNAZI)
If the Towers were mostly pre-demolished, with floors empty or nonexistent, some missiles would have traveled right through the building:
Multiple missiles must have been used, from multiple angles:
Originally posted by Yankee451
reply to post by -W1LL
what are your thoughts on this it is somewhat new to me is there any evidence for what Clarke claims.?
Clarke is controlled opposition.
Planes can't do what we were shown on TV; it's not possible. By pretending to shed suspicion on CIA regarding "hijackers", Clarke is reinforceing the lie that it IS possible.
Lightweight aluminum wings cannot cut structural steel columns. Anyone who says they can is either lying or a fool.edit on 11-8-2011 by Yankee451 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by GenRadek
reply to post by ecoparity
I dont doubt in a controlled setting they would be stable, but how well would they last out of the packaging, rigged up, exposed to the elements?
Originally posted by Yankee451
reply to post by -W1LL
what are your thoughts on this it is somewhat new to me is there any evidence for what Clarke claims.?
Clarke is controlled opposition.
Planes can't do what we were shown on TV; it's not possible. By pretending to shed suspicion on CIA regarding "hijackers", Clarke is reinforceing the lie that it IS possible.
Lightweight aluminum wings cannot cut structural steel columns. Anyone who says they can is either lying or a fool.edit on 11-8-2011 by Yankee451 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by smurfy
reply to post by Yankee451
There are problems visa ve the North tower being hit by a 'plane as large as a 767- as the Naudet brothers film has clearly be doctored with, you only have to look at the video to see the wing hole expanding before your eyes after collision,
Originally posted by wmd_2008
reply to post by Yankee451
Still on about your missiles then with NO real evidence ,found any drawings with a concrete core yet?
WMD, I have been studying the core, and it appears we both may be right.
The plans and the permits were in place before 68 when the building codes changed...this makes sense as to why so many folks wrote about the concrete cores, but why there's so little photographic record of it. They may have started with the concrete cores, but then changed the plans after the building codes changed...it'd be a big money saver.
Check this discussion:
letsrollforums.com...
Your grasp of the energy and physics in this is really sad.
Also what about your machine that you claimed was able to do real time graphics of the planes when all it could do was a coloured line on screen!
Originally posted by smurfy
reply to post by wmd_2008
I've linked it that many times and I should not have to as it is the only one in town by the Naudet brothers.
Just keep looking at the North tower footage, over and over again.
Originally posted by Yankee451
reply to post by wmd_2008
Oh yeah...you don't read threads.
www.abovetopsecret.com...