It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Greece - A new bill being prepared by the Justice Ministry could spell an end to Internet anonymity for the country’s approximately 55,000 bloggers.
Originally posted by JennaDarling
The pen is mightier than the sword...
seems to be that way doesn't it
Anonimity has a place, that is not everywhere but it has a place.
However, if you truely believe what you say, you should stand behind what you say.
Originally posted by JohnySeagull
Originally posted by JennaDarling
The pen is mightier than the sword...
seems to be that way doesn't it
Anonimity has a place, that is not everywhere but it has a place.
However, if you truely believe what you say, you should stand behind what you say.
try telling that to someone in Syria or Saudia Arabia
Originally posted by JohnySeagull
its coming everywhere to an internet near you !!!!!
www.forbes.com...
Originally posted by Konstantinos
Anonymity ban being explored for blogs
Originally posted by Konstantinos
It's a slippery slope that's for sure.
It would be years and years before it would be openly implemented in North America, but it's worth keeping an eye on...
The substance of the proposals that have the potential to fundamentally reshape the Internet in Canada. The bills contain a three-pronged approach focused on information disclosure, mandated surveillance technologies, and new police powers.
The first prong mandates the disclosure of Internet provider customer information without court oversight. Under current privacy laws, providers may voluntarily disclose customer information but are not required to do so. The new system would require the disclosure of customer name, address, phone number, email address, Internet protocol address, and a series of device identification numbers.
While some of that information may seem relatively harmless, the ability to link it with other data will often open the door to a detailed profile about an identifiable person. Given its potential sensitivity, the decision to require disclosure without any oversight should raise concerns within the Canadian privacy community.
The second prong requires Internet providers to dramatically re-work their networks to allow for real-time surveillance. The bill sets out detailed capability requirements that will eventually apply to all Canadian Internet providers. These include the power to intercept communications, to isolate the communications to a particular individual, and to engage in multiple simultaneous interceptions.
Moreover, the bill establishes a comprehensive regulatory structure for Internet providers that would mandate their assistance with testing their surveillance capabilities and disclosing the names of all employees who may be involved in interceptions (and who may then be subject to RCMP background checks).
The bill also establishes numerous reporting requirements including mandating that all Internet providers disclose their technical surveillance capabilities within six months of the law taking effect. Follow-up reports are also required when providers acquire new technical capabilities.
The requirements could have a significant impact on many smaller and independent Internet providers. Although the bill grants them a three-year implementation delay, the technical capabilities extend far beyond most of their commercial needs. Indeed, after years of concern over the privacy impact associated with deep-packet inspection of Internet traffic (costly technologies that examine Internet communications in real time), these bills appear to require all Internet providers to install such capabilities.
Having obtained customer information without court oversight and mandated Internet surveillance capabilities, the third prong creates a several new police powers designed to obtain access to the surveillance data. These include new transmission data warrants that would grant real-time access to all the information generated during the creation, transmission or reception of a communication including the type, direction, time, duration, origin, destination or termination of the communication.
.....Anonimity has a place, that is not everywhere but it has a place.
However, if you truely believe what you say, you should stand behind what you say.
Originally posted by crimvelvet
reply to post by JennaDarling
.....Anonimity has a place, that is not everywhere but it has a place.
However, if you truely believe what you say, you should stand behind what you say.
And if you do expect to never ever be able to get a job again. Corporations want "team Players" not mavericks. Human Resource departments routinely google peoples names and if you are not a good little Sheeple for get about getting a job.edit on 11-8-2011 by crimvelvet because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by JennaDarling
Originally posted by crimvelvet
reply to post by JennaDarling
.....Anonimity has a place, that is not everywhere but it has a place.
However, if you truely believe what you say, you should stand behind what you say.
And if you do expect to never ever be able to get a job again. Corporations want "team Players" not mavericks. Human Resource departments routinely google peoples names and if you are not a good little Sheeple for get about getting a job.edit on 11-8-2011 by crimvelvet because: (no reason given)
HR may do that in America, but there is laws here that prevent them, hell I can get 120 day sick leave and the company is NOT ALLOWED to call me (that is harassment ).
They are not allowed to invade your privacy or spie on you at work or what all America seems to take for granted and normal.
Work over 40 hours a week? Unheard off lol, A Company here is NOT ALLOWED to PLAN overtime intentionally.
edit on 11-8-2011 by JennaDarling because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by JennaDarling
Originally posted by crimvelvet
reply to post by JennaDarling
.....Anonimity has a place, that is not everywhere but it has a place.
However, if you truely believe what you say, you should stand behind what you say.
And if you do expect to never ever be able to get a job again. Corporations want "team Players" not mavericks. Human Resource departments routinely google peoples names and if you are not a good little Sheeple for get about getting a job.edit on 11-8-2011 by crimvelvet because: (no reason given)
HR may do that in America, but there is laws here that prevent them, hell I can get 120 day sick leave and the company is NOT ALLOWED to call me (that is harassment ).
They are not allowed to invade your privacy or spie on you at work or what all America seems to take for granted and normal.
Work over 40 hours a week? Unheard off lol, A Company here is NOT ALLOWED to PLAN overtime intentionally.
edit on 11-8-2011 by JennaDarling because: (no reason given)
The Conservatives plan on introducing an omnibus crime bill when the House resumes that wraps all of their previous legislation into one.
The bill is promoted as allowing police to track and prosecute the perverts passing around child pornography and allows them to update their monitoring techniques to deal with the ever-changing computerized world we live in.
Sounds fine. What could be wrong with that?
In fact, there’s nothing wrong with that part, but there is plenty to worry about in what they propose to do regarding hate crimes.
The bill plans to make it a crime to link to any website that promotes hatred.
Here’s what the Library of Parliament says about the bill on its website: “Clause 5 of the bill provides that the offences of public incitement of hatred and wilful promotion of hatred may be committed by any means of communication and include making hate material available, by creating a hyperlink that directs web surfers to a website where hate material is posted, for example.”
For simply posting a link to a website that has material someone else deems hateful, you could go to jail for two years and be branded a criminal.
The Internet police. Only in Canada.
This isn’t about protecting people from genocide or even threats of death, the way the law is written now is much broader.
“Everyone who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promotes hatred against an identifiable group is guilty.”
Originally posted by JennaDarling
The pen is mightier than the sword...
seems to be that way doesn't it
Anonimity has a place, that is not everywhere but it has a place.
However, if you truely believe what you say, you should stand behind what you say.
Originally posted by JennaDarling
Originally posted by Konstantinos
It's a slippery slope that's for sure.
It would be years and years before it would be openly implemented in North America, but it's worth keeping an eye on...
Britian has been an opressive government for decades.... Northern Ireland for a start.
All phone calls from NI to the mainland and back where monitored and where routed via the main DMSU's to mainland entry points for monitoring. Probably still are today. All travel was monitored heavily for boats, planes etc.
edit on 11-8-2011 by JennaDarling because: (no reason given)