3 UFO found on NASA beacon files

reply to post by MainLineThis


That's what differs ATS so immense from other sites! You start with the subject "UFO" and one hour later people are insulting each other and no one talks about the thread anymore. Great tactic! Shame the OP cannot delete these utterly useless contributions as we can on Youtube.

reply to post by Chadwickus


None of these images has been tampered with. Yes AHEAD was flipped. I noticed that after I already completed a part of the video. Why these settings are different? The objects are not visible in normal mode. You have to use the color pickers on the left side to adjust the balance between black background and white for the solar flares and the 3 UFO. You want the original FTS files? No problemo.

Send me a PM.

reply to post by Phage


For "data points" to be the same, the data that goes in has to be the same.

These are 2 different images, from 2 different sattelites. the images are compressed ON the sattelite and beamed down before theyre processed.

I dont think these are artifacts.

reply to post by 1967sander


Still doesn't explain why your images are identical despite being (supposedly) taken from opposite sides of the sun.

And why not link the the original files here?

As well as where to download the FITS viewer.

Cheers!

reply to post by Chadwickus


if thats true you should ask nasa, not him.

Originally posted by WingedBull

Originally posted by thruthseek3r
As I said many times, they can't hide forever the truth about what's happening in space. Nasa knows it too, so give it time ladies and gentlemen and we will all know one day the real truth behind all of these lies to us.

If NASA was trying to cover-up the existence of UFOs, why would they make such satellite footage available to the public?

just to answer your question..which im sorry to tell you that lacks from some good reasoning...like in chess you left a gap open and im gonna attack

lets assume that the UFO's are real...than it will be also possible that such an event isnt rare either but quiet common...having motherships refueling from our mother star....

that it can also be common for a photo like this to slip away...and becoming available to the public until its on youtube


since i'm a big supporter for life in the universe...im gonna flag this thread..its very interesting

reply to post by Chadwickus


OKAY!

stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov...
stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov...

20110122_105530_n7euA.fts 22-Jan-2011 06:15 534K
20110122_123530_n7euA.fts 22-Jan-2011 07:56 534K
AHEAD records every 10 minutes ??? 90 minutes missing!!!

Actually at some dates MANY HOURS are missing!!!

FITS viewer

www.spacetelescope.org...

Play around with the black and white levels.

Good luck!

Greetz,

Sander

Originally posted by 1967sander
reply to post by Phage

 

I think you should read NASA's technical manual again.

i respect you for your research..my tip is to look for an artifact from Ahead and try to find it on Behind...if you do ..phage is right...if no... will wish i could flag you twice

gluck

reply to post by 1967sander


Great.

So here's the ahead view from the data you provided:



And the Behind view:



So why are these two views different (as they should be) but the two that you used in the video to show that the UFO's were showing up on A and B at the same time are the identical...they're both from STEREO Behind.

The side by side shot from the video again:



Looks familiar...

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/04e2be5fbce8.png[/atsimg]

So why have you flipped the STEREO B image, called it STEREO A and then flipped it back to make out that the objects match...of course they match, they're from the same image...

Originally posted by MainLineThis

Don't kill the messenger. Or do. I will only get banned....

And what's the message?

All you've done here is take time out of your job as Scientist at the University of Science, Science Town USA to insult a critical thinker via text message...

The man (or woman) brings up very good points.....Points which you have yet to disprove or even argue...Points you havn't even taken into consideration.....

I'm guessing it's because you lack any kind of know how or ability to think for yourself...

An assumption that you seem to back up with each and every post....3 pages later, and you've still got nothing...Nothing to contribute....Nothing to argue....empty space...

If you can disprove this man's work, do so...If you can provide any sort of evidence to the contrary, we'd love to see it....

But i know that all you've got to offer are generic insults fueled by your unwarranted arrogance....

Please, save yourself the trouble of having me pick you apart in front of these nice people..

Personally, i'm interested in how two different pieces of equipment could produce the same compression artifact at the same time from two different angles.....It's not as easily explained away as some would like to believe...

Right or wrong, i respect the man's work...

flagged.

reply to post by Chadwickus


You are WRONG! If you want prove something pay more attention to right file numbers!

You looked up the wrong images! You should have looked for: 20110122 - 10:45:30. (A + B)

So check it again! The times you looked up are those when NASA put them up on the server!

reply to post by 1967sander

This has been explained again and again.. It is artifacts due to highly compressed images and distortions from radiation and similar.

And btw.. There is no way two satellites can show the exact same thing as they arent even located in same spot.
I wonder why you even posted this thread, as it is clear you had already made up your mind beforehand.

reply to post by 1967sander


10:45.30:



A few hours doesn't make a difference and doesn't change the fact that your side by side images both show STEREO B

Why can't you tell us why you've used STEREO B twice?

reply to post by MainLineThis


THIS......

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by 1967sander

 

10:45.30:

A few hours doesn't make a difference and doesn't change the fact that your side by side images both show STEREO B

Why can't you tell us why you've used STEREO B twice?

edit on 10/8/11 by Chadwickus because: (no reason given)

THIS is how you argue the man's science....

chad is right...

they are from the same source..

sry to blow your research on this..good luck for your next 1

EDIT TO ADD : MYSTERY STILL UNSOLVED IT SEEMS

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/2ece0dfc03e3.jpg[/atsimg]

reply to post by Chadwickus


It makes a huge difference! It is exactly this particular timeframe that is of interest.I have not used BEHIND twice. I took the files as provided by NASA.

The links for download are here:

stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov...
stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov...

Greetz,

Sander

reply to post by heineken


The image from A seems to be different from the one in the video. Makes sense since it's from the opposite side of the Sun.

The cosmic ray hits show in one, but not the other. That makes sense too.

reply to post by 1967sander


Those two are different from each other, exactly what you'd expect from STEREO A and B.

The two images you show in your video are identical, both from STEREO B.

reply to post by MainLineThis


im getting sick and tired of your trolling threads with your venomous garbage.
ive yet to see you contribute even 1 positive post to a thread
and i see you've yet to start a thread. we all know why that is dont we?
you've nothing interesting to say. you're an old bitter troll
im surprised the mods dont block your posts as they are all off topic
theres nothing more unfunny as someone that laughs at their own pathetic effort of a joke.
isnt that right mainlinethis, lol

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by 1967sander

 

Those two are different from each other, exactly what you'd expect from STEREO A and B.

The two images you show in your video are identical, both from STEREO B.

so if the two images are both from stereo B, then theres nothing to see here?

is this deception on purpose then?