UFO Seen By Airplane Passenger - Aug. 2011 (+identical object from 2008!)

Originally posted by reresearch
reply to post by JennaDarling

 

Rather than a Sony HD camera why doesn't someone just buy an actual High Speed camera lol then you wont have to hack the firmware. Id rather spend the money on a good camera than hack the firmware on an old one but that's just me lol

These are high speed. and they are not old lol, they also cost about 1300 Euros for one.

I would know, I have one.

The only problem is the duraction they capture, which would be constrained in the firmware which is also updateable over USB.

reply to post by JennaDarling


Lol that is true but I am talking about buying a Phantom cam. Something like a Phantom HD GOLD High-Speed Digital Camera.

Phantom cam

Originally posted by markymint
A nice little video. The "brightness/contrast" change as some have called it looks more like an adjustment to the shutter speed, which would be controlled manually, and wouldn't just kick in on it's own accord. It's very feasable that the cam operator switched it to a higher shutter speed and at that moment caught the object. That's what shutter speed is all about, catching faster objects - especially ones closer to the lens.

Considering my own experiences and what several other members have said in this thread - these things do seem to exist. Strips of light that move incredibly fast, and from my own own (ground) experience, have always seemed to be around the same height as normal jet-liners. I'd make an educated guess that the object in question is between the length of a bus, to the length of up to two maybe 3 jet liners. I'm afraid I can't really back that claim up with anything as it's based on what I've seen myself, sorry. I'd advise folks not to assume it's "far off in the distance and is huge" - because that's very unlikely, considering mostly the real reports of such objects.

My only gripe with this video is that the speed of the object doesn't seem to be constant, it seems to speed up, almost "flicking" itself off in the distance. But even if it's a hoax, they managed to get the speed and nature of some of the REAL UFO's (that I've seen at least) down to a T. And that is also a good reason for me to somewhat have faith in this video.

I'd be interested to know what direction the jet was heading in, and maybe discern what direction the object was heading in. I have seen these objects but only moving along direct N S E W lines, never NE or SE or anything so that's something I'd like to compare. But other than that - great catch.

Also highly worrying... would be interesting to see if the original person that caught it "cares"... I mean I guess they do to an extent, but whether they are now concerned about flying. I mean, they were nearly impacted by an object moving thousands of miles per hour.

Cool stuff though - thanks for sharing!

Several people have mentioned the change in contrast about 9 seconds in, but that is simply the video being repeated with some contrast to show the light better. The original video is the first 8 seconds, with the light appearing around the 4 sec mark. Everything else is just enhanced replays.

LOL!
Hey, that looks too close to my UFO!
So I have to call this one fake since I know mine is.
My UFO is a Hollow cylinder cloaking UFO




Hollow Tube Cloaking Craft < More info at a later date

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/dc54483780f8.jpg[/atsimg]

reply to post by mysteryskeptic




There's nothing there

EDIT: I stand corrected, there's really no comparison though.

Originally posted by markymint
A nice little video. The "brightness/contrast" change as some have called it looks more like an adjustment to the shutter speed, which would be controlled manually, and wouldn't just kick in on it's own accord. It's very feasable that the cam operator switched it to a higher shutter speed and at that moment caught the object. That's what shutter speed is all about, catching faster objects - especially ones closer to the lens.

Why? Why would anyone need or want to change to a higher shutter speed to capture what is practically static sky in a cruising jet at altitude? Accidental? I suppose it could be but it is still very suspect to me... in the scenario we watch, it doesn't make sense.... why increase shutter speed to capture a nearly still image?

reply to post by Zcustosmorum

Thanks for that footage, throws a rather different light on the OP video.
Also, is that Devil's Tower, or whatsitsname, from Close Encounters?????

IT is interesting, that most of the comments from the people who took these videos, is that they never noticed the "UFO" until they had watched their own footage a few times, and discovered the anomoly.
What that indicates to me, and my feeble mind, is that, for all intents and purposes, these objects are virtually invisible to the human naked eye. How often do we see a "Flash" or something out the corner of our eye, but dont actually observe anything else. What if these things travel so fast, that they are unnoticed by humans.
Are these objects the famous "FOO Fighters"? They certainly have an affinity for aircraft.
Are these things other dimensional objects that appear ghost like in our reality?
Are they a Life form, we are not aware of?
Are they Meteors (not likely) or slow tachyons?
Are they static electricity/ ball lightening type things?
Are Women with large breasts better in bed?

These things we may never know.....but the In Search Of team at ATS with be on the case...Beam me up Mr Scott. (did anyone notice that Spock (Lennard) was one of the voices in the new Transformers 3???

Is my Hamburger ready yet, Mom?? OK time to go.......

reply to post by JSpeed


Is it possible that this IS a reflection on the window created by light bouncing off something bright on the inside that a flight attendant or other passenger may have been carrying while walking in the aisle? A coffee pot, a chrome cart, a shiny badge or something similar? It would account for the appearance of great speed and the change of "speed" caused by the slight curvature of the interior window.

I mean, this kind of stuff has to be absolutely ruled out, meaning it has to be ruled out by example or verifiable evidence before anyone starts leaping to exotic tech and beyond. That is how this process is supposed to work.

Its a computer generated "airplane","background","clouds","moving thingy","CGI"

everything about the OPs video screams HOAX.

Just focus on the wing of the "supposed" plane and you'll start getting the picture......I would hope???

Oooooh another FSX hoax video lol

This is a game....Flight Simulator X (10)

Theres loads of hoaxes like this on youtube...the guy above me is right...from start to finish its cgi...as its game footage.

Il look at it more tomos as its VERY late here...5am and i need my bed, but im 99% sure this is just game footage that has been edited to add the "UFO"


EDIT: Im blocked from the channel....this confirms this is 100% FAKE, as i called this person out on his other FAKE footage a few months back...which is why they blocked me from posting



He did another one and i proved it was a game...believe me or not, i know its fake

The original youtube poster of this video, Foxinyourmouth, a film maker, seems to have a panache for playing around with video equipment, even to the extent of creating his own green screen scenes. He has done a number of flying in a plane videos trying to present some humor into prolonged flight. It seems as if his camera is a good source of entertainment for him.


The LINKY to his YouTube Channel I'm sure he will appreciate the hits. Some of his film is not bad and he does have some nice equipment to use.

Check out the channel, see if it makes a difference...

alright folks, i havnt had the time to read every post so i appoligize if this has already been said.
I do have a theory on all these "ufos" that are too small to fit any type of life form in them. most of these ufos look like light im sure you would all agree.

now.. if you keep an open mind, for those of you who know about project blue beam some of the things that are related to that conspiracy is holograms very real holograms made by certain secret so called sattalites that project a great amount of powerful light from the outer layers of space down to earth where it is seen by the visible eye.

an example of this is of when Mary herself visited Africa back in 4/20
(i am not familiar on how to put vids up) (see link for video)

www.youtube.com...

now that you have seen this, and know what these projectors are capable of, how they can basically transmit any image or video upon the clouds and make it seem realistic.

dont you think that these UFOs that are fast paced bits of lite being projected from these huge projectors and being seen all over the world?

just think about it, glowing ufos all around the world moving at unthinkable speeds, made of light... its kind of like a giant flashlight from space shining down making circular light shapes in the air all over the place.

could this be NASA testing out these projections on us to prepare us for the real light show?

When are people going to realize that all UFOs are man made and have been by Russia & Germany since the early 20th century.

IF there are any outer space alien UFOs, with alien beings, they are likely better 'beings' than earthings, and smarter....so they will stay away from this crapped up planet.

Originally posted by canadiansenior70
IF there are any outer space alien UFOs, with alien beings, they are likely better 'beings' than earthings, and smarter....so they will stay away from this crapped up planet.

I think i like you, Sir.
This is SO clear for me too.
Respect.
---

Although there's another idea novadays regarding inter/multidimensional/so-called-demonic/paranormal origin of UFO's.
And to be honest, as for UFO researcher for almost 20 years this quite fresh idea suddenly seems to be quite intriguing for some reason.
(EOT).

Originally posted by JibbyJedi
It's not CGI.
The non UFO argument can be that it's a reflection of light off the window from someone off to the side moving a light source quickly, like a flashlight moving left to right fast.

If it's not an internal light source streak, then this is a good capture of something unknown to us moving rapidly outside. I've seen quite a few videos slowed down showing similar streaking objects, if they are real, we'll never catch them to identify what they are.

Can I ask how you know this is not CGI? Considering CGI can be photo realistic these days.

reply to post by Lost_Mind


Hi there. Usually because it's a much simpler method than adjusting the exposure or setting the white balance. Most old video cameras had a little button with a running man on it, maybe they still do - a symbol for "sport". Pressing that button increases the shutter speed. So there's always been a shortcut on most camcorders to up the shutter speed in an instant. It could well have been an honest mistake, but it's a perfectly acceptable routine. And to me far more than if they had adjusted the exposure or white balance.

Originally posted by canadiansenior70
When are people going to realize that all UFOs are man made and have been by Russia & Germany since the early 20th century.

IF there are any outer space alien UFOs, with alien beings, they are likely better 'beings' than earthings, and smarter....so they will stay away from this crapped up planet.

Does that explain the Vinima and the disc's orbs in old paintings?

We will probably never know about this one BUT the point I want to make is: this is just one way that the ships can appear.... speed, light etc.

If this is not real it still gives you am example of exactly what to look for.

The ships travel our skies always.

reply to post by Zcustosmorum


This could be anything from someone waving their cell phone behind the person, so a freak lighting bolt.

Not enough prove anything.

reply to post by markymint


I have since found out that the video in the very first post of this thread is an enhanced and lengthened version of the video with contrast and brightness adjusted possibly by Sheilaliens to make the object/reflection more visible. The original (8 sec.) untouched version is at Foxinyourmouth's YouTube channel and this effect is not present.

He was using a new Canon 60D and is a film maker. He is very open to find out what it might be and thinks that it could very well be a reflection of some type as well as anything else. I have a post asking him about this under the video and he has responded to me on it...