It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ohioriver
Originally posted by Reaper2137
Originally posted by abe froman
reply to post by TheGooner
theres plenty of youtube video of members of the us military who went door to door disarming citizens who legally owned guns in the wake of katrina and afterwards telling the reporter "I really hate to have to do this but orders are orders"
That would also be the nat guard. They hated to do it but the other side to that coin is we were being shot at trying to deliver supply's to people. Help get people out and protect the area from looting. A few people ruined it for every one sorry to say but its true. My unit was also their and we did take people weapons after we shoot a few people for shooting at us. Mostly jackasses who think now that the cops are gone I can get a big screen.
So you are trying to justify illegally confiscating citizens guns? How many houses did your unit search out, that was no where near where you were shot at, and break into to steal the citizens lawfully acquired and possessed guns? Wake up buddy!!! Just following orders will not get you a free pass for breaking the law!
Marshal law was declared so I wasn't breaking the law. Read what a These laws really mean and not just what you see on t.v and In movies
Originally posted by Tnewguy
The reason for all the movement of military equipment is because theyre having an epic garage sale in front of the whitehouse.
Getting rid of old stuff to fund new projects.
Originally posted by 1PLA1
reply to post by Reaper2137
Thank you for your service to this country Reaper.
The National Guard helped save my home during the Arizona fire. It jumped into New Mexico and was stopped a mere 13 miles from my home.
I don't know what the military bigwigs are up to, but I do know that most of our men in uniform are patriots.
Originally posted by TimesEnd
All great posts, a lot of them informative.
But if all this stuff is based on that one video with the train pulling military equipment. I would like to ask people who have been in the Military to look at the vehicels on the cars. Some are out of date or come from another country's military. No heavy armored or Personal Carriers. I didn't see any Bradley's. It was all jeeps, different versions of cargos like a Vietnam era Duce, 2.5ton France style cargo truck, and HumV's. Now for the red markings, yes we use infared markers but that didn't look like them.
My guess would be movie props for some production. But thats my opinion
Originally posted by Reaper2137
The National Guard still used old ass equipment like that bud and I would think that the red signs are packing manifests we use them to ship every thing and any thing.. If there was a nuke on that train it would have a red packing manifest.
Originally posted by TimesEnd
Originally posted by Reaper2137
The National Guard still used old ass equipment like that bud and I would think that the red signs are packing manifests we use them to ship every thing and any thing.. If there was a nuke on that train it would have a red packing manifest.
Now that is true the Guards do use outdated equip. I will grant you that. But never stuff from France and the old USSR.
The packing manifests that is a fact.... red ones are use for nuke shipments. Being ex Army MP myself I do know this. But I never notice any questionable cargo that would lead me to believe that something Nuclear was being transported. If there was something on that train that I didn't see plz post it cause I would like to see for myself. Side note: Wouldn't a Nuclear cargo have an escort of some sort.... do to the fact of National Security?
Nothing was covered up everything was transparent.edit on 6-8-2011 by TimesEnd because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by jaffer44
reply to post by Reaper2137
So its ok that you take guns for your safty but the home owner had to give his up qand can't defend his home. Take the registed guns and what's left just the crims with the unregested guns I bet no registed guns were fired at the nat guard
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
reply to post by Reaper2137
Show me where in the Constitution it calls for the creation of a Federal police force.
Why did Posse Comitatus ever exist?
We thought it wrong over 100 years ago to use Army troops as police but the Warner defense act of 2007 overturned it. It remains unconstitutional nonetheless.
You might call it policing, others might call it treason.edit on 7-8-2011 by Asktheanimals because: added comments
Originally posted by TheGooner
After bearing witness to the events in London last night, www.bbc.co.uk... I think we are the ones who need to worry about civil unrest. haha.
Although not related to the economic or political problems, but a (rather large) mob who got out of control.
We do not have a set up similar to your Nat Guard in this country to deal with civil unrest. we do have reserve forces but they have a primary role to fight along side regular forces, not deal with situations like this.
As for the police.. pfft! Did next to nothing as they did not seem to be equiped to deal with this level of unrest. The area looks tike down town baghdad circa 2003.
Im thinking that if we had similar set up to the Nat Guard these youths/idiots/cowards/*%@&%^?# would have not done so much damage or contiued to riot for so long.edit on 7-8-2011 by TheGooner because: (no reason given)edit on 7-8-2011 by TheGooner because: (no reason given)