It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
What really ticks me off is how people on welfare are having children to get more money. It's like they use children as a raise in pay. This is not right in the least, yet the welfare system does nothing about it.
Originally posted by Forevever
I continuously see the same misconceptions over and over about Welfare so just a few facts that have been in affect since Clinton.
The personal responsibility and work opportunity act requires welfare recipients to put forth an effort to receive their check. They either have to prove they are actively looking for work, or in the process of becoming "job ready" (schooling).
If they are found to be completely disabled, they have to apply for SSI or SSD.
There is a 5 year lifetime limit for cash benefits, with a 2 child cap in most states. So if you can get by without that cash benefit, I recommend you save those 5 years for a time when you might really be in dire straights.
It isn't like the 70's and 80's where you could keep popping out a baby to increase your check. You should check your current states policies to see how people are affected by it (some states have a family cap, where you get the same benefit no matter if you have 1 child or 10).
Once you understand the system, along with the fact that they are OVERWORKED and UNDERSTAFFED, then you can help out by reporting people who are blatantly abusing the system in some way.
People do fall through the cracks.
None of these things are applicable to foodstamps. There are very little limitations on foodstamps. The first and most important being your income.
If you have low enough income to qualify, then you should get foodstamps. Thats my personal opinion. Especially if you have children. You're free to live on rice and potatoes if you like, but I would want a child to have a more well rounded meal. The majority of health problems that are so prevalent today, are often connected to poor diet.
Disclaimer: Forgive me for failed usage of effect vs affect, if this applies ♥ Also forgive my use of wiki links, I recommend people who really have a gripe, to research it further on their own.edit on 6-8-2011 by Forevever because: (no reason given)
Welfare benefits are most often calculated based on family size. Many states passed family cap policies, which deny additional benefits or reduce the cash grant to families who have additional children while on assistance. According to the Welfare Rules Database from the Urban Institute, and NCSL legislative summaries, at least 19 states currently have a family cap policy and an additional two states have a flat cash assistance grant regardless of family size. Most of these state policies were passed in or around 1996 - 1997.
The US welfare system stayed in the hands of the federal government for the next sixty-one years. Many Americans were unhappy with the welfare system, claiming that individuals were abusing the welfare program by not applying for jobs, having more children just to get more aid, and staying unmarried so as to qualify for greater benefits. Welfare system reform became a hot topic in the1990's. Bill Clinton was elected as President with the intention of reforming the federally run US Welfare program. In 1996 the Republican Congress passed a reform law signed by President Clinton that gave the control of the welfare system back to the states.
Originally posted by XJMatt
reply to post by KnightFire
I'd have to call BS on this, I have been on welfare AND foodstamps within a year and a half ago. Me and my wife could not find work PERIOD in or around our city. Had no other choice but to accept welfare, we got the Max for a family of 3 guess how much we got..... believe me it was nowhere what you apparently uninformed/misinformed people think.
We got a measly $689 dollars of cash aid and $200 in foodstamps a month. Period. Now when you figure the absolute CHEAPEST place to rent is at least $350 in my area, then diapers for my daughter and other essential needs such as clothes,wipes etc....... BELIEVE ME I thank God that my wife was able to find work and I was able to get some sidejobs through a few shops I had worked at previously....
Welfare is NO way to live and while I agree alot of people take advantage of it,I must say unless they are working and scamming the system or are doing other illegal things, its not the "free ride" or as lucrative as you make it out to be. For honest people such as myself and family it was a blessing to have as an option but it was definently nothing more then JUST ENOUGH to keep us from starving to death.
I thank God my welfare experience was extremely short lived if I had to suffer a year of THAT,........edit on 8/6/2011 by XJMatt because: (no reason given)
None of these things are applicable to foodstamps. There are very little limitations on foodstamps. The first and most important being your income
in most states
You should check your current states policies to see how people are affected by it
People do fall through the cracks.
Also forgive my use of wiki links, I recommend people who really have a gripe, to research it further on their own
Originally posted by Forevever
reply to post by KnightFire
None of these things are applicable to foodstamps. There are very little limitations on foodstamps. The first and most important being your income
because they're federal, not state
Also forgive my use of wiki links, I recommend people who really have a gripe, to research it further on their own
I'm glad to see you did. ♥
I would hope if you see someone abusing the system, you'd report them.
Also to give an example, there is a couple with 3 kids that live down the street from me. I have talked to them several times and they tell me they make more money on welfare then they both did working.
Their welfare checks pay enough to have a $200,000 house, 2 brand new cars, nice things inside their house and there kids wear name brand clothing and one of them has a car. They also have an in-ground pool and awesome gardening.
Originally posted by Forevever
reply to post by KnightFire
Is it possible at all that they inherited the house?
Is it possible they claim to be "better off" out of pride?
Is it possible they're dealing drugs to make up the difference...... (very possible actually), but those new clothes could be coming from "grandma" or "auntie". You really can't know whats going on unless you're involved in that family. The rest is hear-say.
The inground pool came with the house - if its owned outright, nothing welfare can do - they stopped liens over 20 years ago as well. I know this for sure because I own my house, and it was inherited, and came with a welfare lien - I believe it was in 1990 that lien was ... "expunged"? not sure if the term is right (I was a teenager at the time, my mother handled all that).
If you reported it, I would imagine someone investigated. If they didn't, maybe you should move up the ladder. Who did you report it to directly? If you called the secretary at the CAO, who knows who got that message and threw it in the trash?
All I'm saying is things are not always what they appear to be. I'm not trying to be argumentive, so if I sound like it I apologize. You don't need to justify to me where you get your opinion, just advising you that if you're firm on it, you should be contacting someone other than your original attempt.