It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Athin
This is a serious question I have for you Obama supporters. When you actually look at the facts thats right in front of you... is there any reason to continue supporting him? Do the research on ANY numbers before and after he took office. GDP is down. Unemployment is up. People collecting unemployment benefits is up. The people on food stamps is at a record high. I don't want to hear "he is fixing the problems Bush left us with". This crutch is getting so old... Obama knew from day one what kind of trouble the economy was in according to Christina Romer(as she resigned). He isn't helping this country at all.
Lets not forget about his healthcare bill which now people in his own administration are claiming is going to cost a huge amount more than expected. Well more than they SAY expected because from the moment it was introduced people said his numbers don't add up. We can't forget his budget bill either which was shot down 97-0. It's apparent he has no clue what he is doing.
Can any of you Obama supporters tell me what he promised before elected that he has kept his word on? He hasn't done a thing for this country except put us even further in debt... as he continues to spend. I just want some sort of reasoning... an explanation that makes sense so I can see where you guys are coming from.
Originally posted by Athin
This is a serious question I have for you Obama supporters. When you actually look at the facts thats right in front of you... is there any reason to continue supporting him? Do the research on ANY numbers before and after he took office. GDP is down. Unemployment is up. People collecting unemployment benefits is up. The people on food stamps is at a record high. I don't want to hear "he is fixing the problems Bush left us with". This crutch is getting so old... Obama knew from day one what kind of trouble the economy was in according to Christina Romer(as she resigned). He isn't helping this country at all.
Originally posted by Athin
Lets not forget about his healthcare bill which now people in his own administration are claiming is going to cost a huge amount more than expected. Well more than they SAY expected because from the moment it was introduced people said his numbers don't add up. We can't forget his budget bill either which was shot down 97-0. It's apparent he has no clue what he is doing.
Originally posted by Athin
Can any of you Obama supporters tell me what he promised before elected that he has kept his word on? He hasn't done a thing for this country except put us even further in debt... as he continues to spend. I just want some sort of reasoning... an explanation that makes sense so I can see where you guys are coming from.
Originally posted by citizen6511
Originally posted by Athin
This is a serious question I have for you Obama supporters. When you actually look at the facts thats right in front of you... is there any reason to continue supporting him? Do the research on ANY numbers before and after he took office. GDP is down. Unemployment is up. People collecting unemployment benefits is up. The people on food stamps is at a record high. I don't want to hear "he is fixing the problems Bush left us with". This crutch is getting so old... Obama knew from day one what kind of trouble the economy was in according to Christina Romer(as she resigned). He isn't helping this country at all.
Lets not forget about his healthcare bill which now people in his own administration are claiming is going to cost a huge amount more than expected. Well more than they SAY expected because from the moment it was introduced people said his numbers don't add up. We can't forget his budget bill either which was shot down 97-0. It's apparent he has no clue what he is doing.
Can any of you Obama supporters tell me what he promised before elected that he has kept his word on? He hasn't done a thing for this country except put us even further in debt... as he continues to spend. I just want some sort of reasoning... an explanation that makes sense so I can see where you guys are coming from.
i could write a book about what i don't like about Obama, but i'll probably still vote for him since i see the republicans as being much worse.
any republicans who would become president would probably pick his apointees from congressional recommendations.
that should be enough to scare the voters and reelect Obama.
he is bad, his oponents are extremely much worse, that's the problem.
Originally posted by wcitizen
Originally posted by citizen6511
Originally posted by Athin
This is a serious question I have for you Obama supporters. When you actually look at the facts thats right in front of you... is there any reason to continue supporting him? Do the research on ANY numbers before and after he took office. GDP is down. Unemployment is up. People collecting unemployment benefits is up. The people on food stamps is at a record high. I don't want to hear "he is fixing the problems Bush left us with". This crutch is getting so old... Obama knew from day one what kind of trouble the economy was in according to Christina Romer(as she resigned). He isn't helping this country at all.
Lets not forget about his healthcare bill which now people in his own administration are claiming is going to cost a huge amount more than expected. Well more than they SAY expected because from the moment it was introduced people said his numbers don't add up. We can't forget his budget bill either which was shot down 97-0. It's apparent he has no clue what he is doing.
Can any of you Obama supporters tell me what he promised before elected that he has kept his word on? He hasn't done a thing for this country except put us even further in debt... as he continues to spend. I just want some sort of reasoning... an explanation that makes sense so I can see where you guys are coming from.
i could write a book about what i don't like about Obama, but i'll probably still vote for him since i see the republicans as being much worse.
any republicans who would become president would probably pick his apointees from congressional recommendations.
that should be enough to scare the voters and reelect Obama.
he is bad, his oponents are extremely much worse, that's the problem.
You're going to vote for Obamination the dictator instead of Ron Paul? I find your reasoning unfathomable.
Both republicans and democrats are on the SAME side. They take it in turns to play good cop bad cop. They pursue the same exact agenda, just packaged in a different set of lies.
Originally posted by soundguy
Please tell me you are joking?
I, like the other poster, could write a book about the things I do not like about our president.
Obamas’ accomplishments that I like so far.
Killed OBL
Had Pirates drilled in the head (hear much out of them lately?).
Scaled/scaling down the “stupid” war in Iraq.
Escalated the right war (Afghanistan).
Working with Pakistan to take the fight to the Taliban.
I like his liberal use of drones keeping our servicemen and women safer.
Working in a bipartisan way with the wing nuts in Congress (to a fault).
Did NOT have a shuttle disaster (Same as Clinton).
Got Health Care Reform brought up for a vote and got it passed.
Has kept me and my family safe from foreign terrorist attacks on our homeland.
Did not come for my guns.
Did not come for my money/wealth.
Did not raise my taxes.
Slowly but surely repealing don’t ask don’t tell. And that in turn is keeping the GLBT community rather silent.
Presided/presiding over the democratizing of the Middle East with deftness.
I could go. The above are all things that candidate Obama said he would and would not do. As well as a few of the things that I feel stand out, as far as his accomplishments go.
I have to laugh, college economics credit eh? Oh if only we could go back to the glory days of supply side economics. Give it rest already. Chief Wampum gave some economics lessons to a few of my family members a while back, lol.
I like a lot of others like Ron Paul. (even if he prefers chocolate chip cookies over peanut butter). RP is far more liberal than Obama on a great many issues.
I wonder if the OP noticed that he listed an accomplishment in his own diatribe?
Can you honestly say that we'd be in the same position if not for the previous administration? Now it's my turn to feign a lack of understanding.
...In the U.S., Bush, who had worked to "fast track" the signing prior to the end of his term, ran out of time and had to pass the required ratification and signing into law to incoming president Bill Clinton.
Prior to sending it to the United States Senate, Clinton introduced clauses to protect American workers and allay the concerns of many House members.
It also required U.S. partners to adhere to environmental practices and regulations similar to its own. The ability to enforce these clauses, especially with Mexico, and with much consideration and emotional discussion, the House of Representatives approved NAFTA on November 17, 1993, by a vote of 234 to 200. The agreement's supporters included 132 Republicans and 102 Democrats. NAFTA passed the Senate 61-38. Senate supporters were 34 Republicans and 27 Democrats. Clinton signed it into law on December 8, 1993; it went into effect on January 1, 1994.[1][2] Clinton while signing the NAFTA bill stated: "...NAFTA means jobs. American jobs, and good-paying American jobs. If I didn't believe that, I wouldn't support this agreement." en.wikipedia.org...
the Clinton administration also participated in the final round of trade negotiations sponsored by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), an international trade organization.... In a rare move, Clinton convened Congress to ratify the trade agreement in the winter of 1994, during which the treaty was approved. ... a new international trade body, the World Trade Organization (WTO), replaced GATT in 1995. The new WTO had stronger authority to enforce trade agreements and covered a wider range of trade than did GATT.
Clinton faced his first defeat on trade legislation during his second term. In November 1997, the Republican-controlled Congress delayed voting on a bill to restore a presidential trade authority that had expired in 1994. The bill would have given the president the authority to negotiate trade agreements which the Congress was not authorized to modify–known as "fast-track negotiating" because it streamlines the treaty process. Clinton was unable to generate sufficient support for the legislation, even among the Democratic Party.
Clinton faced yet another trade setback in December 1999, when the WTO met in Seattle for a new round of trade negotiations. Clinton hoped that new agreements on issues such as agriculture and intellectual property could be proposed at the meeting, but the talks fell through. Anti-WTO protesters in the streets of Seattle disrupted the meetings[69] and the international delegates attending the meetings were unable to compromise mainly because delegates from smaller, poorer countries resisted Clinton's efforts to discuss labor and environmental standards.[70]
That same year, Clinton signed a landmark trade agreement with the People's Republic of China. The agreement–the result of more than a decade of negotiations–would lower many trade barriers between the two countries, making it easier to export U.S. products such as automobiles, banking services, and motion pictures. However, the agreement could only take effect if China was accepted into the WTO and was granted permanent "normal trade relations" status by the U.S. Congress. Under the pact, the United States would support China's membership in the WTO..... en.wikipedia.org...