It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by neonitus
reply to post by eXia7
they did, though its much safer to drink pasteurised milk. you want to drink raw milk, go ahead
Originally posted by neonitus
reply to post by jdub297
do you really think our tyranical elitist overlords give a # what you put in your coffee?
this story is about jack#ss farmers who want to save a few bucks.
this thread has been a magnet for idiots, yes we know its not perfect, but its the law, obey the law.
edit on 4-8-2011 by neonitus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Tholidor
reply to post by newcovenant
I drink raw milk. I take the chance.
Now let me get this straight, you claim to have lost a family member in the distant past due to raw milk, yet you still ingest that evil substance. That statement doesn't exactly support your position does it?
Originally posted by MegaMind
Originally posted by newcovenant
reply to post by pryingopen3rdeye
You have no right telling strangers what chances they have the right to take.
No, I don't but the FDA does.
Get this straight....
I lost an aunt due to this practice and so sorry if I don't agree and never will.
I think I still have that right don't I?
edit on 4-8-2011 by newcovenant because: (no reason given)
Well someone just lost someone due to the ground turkey that's being recalled. Guess that should be about it for ground turkey. You mess up once and you're outa here huh?
Oh and what about the spinach outbreak? bye bye popeye
Get off your high horse. Lots of people have relatives die from something. doesn't mean everything should be banned because it caused their death. Harry died from choking on a piece of steak. I would have my uncle harry if it weren't for steak - OUTLAW STEAKS NOW!!edit on 4-8-2011 by MegaMind because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by neonitus
reply to post by jdub297
do you really think our tyranical elitist overlords give a # what you put in your coffee?
this story is about jack#ss farmers who want to save a few bucks.
this thread has been a magnet for idiots, yes we know its not perfect, but its the law, obey the law.
edit on 4-8-2011 by neonitus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by donotinducevomiting
Originally posted by neonitus
reply to post by jdub297
do you really think our tyranical elitist overlords give a # what you put in your coffee?
this story is about jack#ss farmers who want to save a few bucks.
this thread has been a magnet for idiots, yes we know its not perfect, but its the law, obey the law.
edit on 4-8-2011 by neonitus because: (no reason given)
god save us from jackass posters too, who are apologist for every excess of fascist government
america has cancer
the agenda of these glassy eyed posters is transparant
Originally posted by neonitus
i think its a legal requirement for milk to be pasteurised (and cheese). they just shut down an illegal farm that was endangering the public.edit on 3-8-2011 by neonitus because: cant spell
And how seriously does USDA take public input? In July 2000, USDA officials claimed in our court hearing that,“The farmers have no rights. No right to be heard before the court, no right to independent testing, and no right to question the USDA.”
The arrogance of the agency has only grown. www.vtcommons.org...
...he [Danny] and Cindi were controlled around the clock by armed guards from September 12th through September 22nd.
The Henshaws were not provided with any test reports....
The hogs that were shot were apparently not tested,...
Arkansas regulations allow 180 days for sell out for slaughter before an order of mandatory destruction is issued. Pseudorabies infected hogs are safe for human consumption. The Henshaws should have been allowed to sell their hogs for slaughter, if pseudorabies had been detected,but they were not allowed to test, confirm the presence of pseudorabies, or sell their hogs
Danny had worked as an undercover narcotics agent and said that this attack goes well beyond his experience as a law officer. nonais.org...
Here are some of FDA's views expressed in its response on 'freedom of food choice' in general and on the right to obtain and consume raw milk in particular:
* "Plaintiffs' assertion of a new 'fundamental right' to produce, obtain, and consume unpasteurized milk lacks any support in law." [p. 4]
* "It is within HHS's authority . . . to institute an intrastate ban [on unpasteurized milk] as well." [p. 6]
* "Plaintiffs' assertion of a new 'fundamental right' under substantive due process to produce, obtain, and consume unpasteurized milk lacks any support in law." [p.17]
* "There is no absolute right to consume or feed children any particular food." [p. 25]
* "There is no 'deeply rooted' historical tradition of unfettered access to foods of all kinds." [p. 26]]
* "Plaintiffs' assertion of a 'fundamental right to their own bodily and physical health, which includes what foods they do and do not choose to consume for themselves and their families' is similarly unavailing because plaintiffs do not have a fundamental right to obtain any food they wish." [p. 26]
* "There is no fundamental right to freedom of contract." [p. 27]]
www.ftcldf.org...
In news coverage of this tragedy, the most significant events often were buried beneath... here were too many instances for this to be merely a mistake or a bureaucratic snafu. There is a clear pattern here that cannot be denied.... [article contains a long list of news articles -cached]
Were agents of the federal government trying to kill American citizens? Were they trying to obtain the maximum death toll and the highest level of human suffering? It would seem that way at first, but I would like to suggest that this incredible behavior stems from something else - something equally unsettling.
The only legitimate function of government is to protect the lives, liberty, and property of its citizens.In New Orleans, however, it was clear that the primary job of the military, FEMA, and Homeland Security was, not to protect citizens, but to protect the government and keep it functioning....
www.freedom-force.org...
The official word from the DA's office is that Stewart, Palmer & Bloch were arrested on criminal conspiracy charges stemming from the alleged illegal production and sale of unpasteurized goat milk, goat cheese, yogurt and kefir. The arrests are the result of a year-long sting. The 13-count complaint alleges that an undercover agent received goat milk, stored in a cooler in the back of Healthy Family Farms van, in the parking lot of a grocery store.
While it's legal to manufacture and sell unpasteurized dairy products in California, licenses and permits are required. Rawesome may have violated regulations by selling raw dairy products to non-members.]
Originally posted by mustangill
reply to post by neonitus
Actually, it is not safer to drink pasteurized milk. I cant drink it since I am allergic to something that is inside it. I cant drink any milk that comes from a store I don't know why but it makes my stomach hurt. This includes whole milk, Sweet Acidophiles, soy, ect,. I've tried them all so, I just gave up and I don't drink milk at all.
Originally posted by newcovenant
Originally posted by donotinducevomiting
Originally posted by neonitus
reply to post by jdub297
do you really think our tyranical elitist overlords give a # what you put in your coffee?
this story is about jack#ss farmers who want to save a few bucks.
this thread has been a magnet for idiots, yes we know its not perfect, but its the law, obey the law.
edit on 4-8-2011 by neonitus because: (no reason given)
god save us from jackass posters too, who are apologist for every excess of fascist government
america has cancer
the agenda of these glassy eyed posters is transparant
Like the Colbert report?
Colbert Report: Rawesome Foods Raid
www.colbertnation.com...
It should be an adult human beings choice to ingest whatever the hell they choose.
But the point of this thread is whether or not an agency of the federal government has the right to deny you your occasional "treat" through edict. Personally, I don't agree that any federal agency has the right to interfere in private commerce - especially in this case where the customers, like yourself, have made the informed decision to purchase a particular product. Keep in mind that this is a private "co-op" and not open to the general public.