It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A senior member of the English Defence League, who founded a far-right website carrying articles by bloggers closely monitored by the Norwegian gunman Anders Behring Breivik, published an online essay discussing the execution and torture of the UK's political and religious leaders. On 23 May 2010, Alan Lake posted on his 4 Freedoms website an article outlining his belief that "in 20 or 30 years the UK will start to fragment into Islamic enclaves". He went on: "It's time we decide... who we will force in the Islamic enclaves (and who we will execute if they sneak out.) By forcing these liberal twits into those enclaves, we will be sending them to their death at worst, and at best they and their families will be subjected to all the depredations, persecution and abuse that non-Muslims worldwide currently 'enjoy' in countries like Pakistan... It will be great to see them executed or tortured to death." Lake urged visitors to the site to contribute the names of people who should be sent to the Islamic enclaves and made three of his own suggestions. He suggested that the Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, should be a candidate on the grounds that he "approves of the creation and use of sharia courts". David Cameron, he explained, should be included in the discussion "to help refine our criteria about who deserves to die at the hands of the Muslim overlords". He also included Nick Clegg on the grounds that he is "such an angelic and pure person that he upholds various 'human rights' issues more important than plebeian matters of public safety".
But in a Republican style of government, there is still a chance that elected officials will not give in to extreme demands like Sharia law, which has absolutely ZERO place in any civilized form of government
Originally posted by woodwardjnr
reply to post by JohhnyBGood
I thought The EDL were meant to be against Muslim extremism only, This seems to suggest that after they have done with the muslims, the "muslim sympathiser" would be next on the hit list. Now seeing as I've been accused of being a Muslim Sympathiser by some. That would put me also on the EDL hit list.
This is why I will continue to defend Muslims, I don't want to be the one that doesn't speak out, because one day someone wont speak out for me.
They came for the muslims and because I was not a muslim I didn't speak out.....edit on 30-7-2011 by woodwardjnr because: (no reason given)
I, and ALL of my peers around here view islam as a clear and presant danger to our way of life
Originally posted by Kram09
reply to post by CrankyPantsUK
I, and ALL of my peers around here view islam as a clear and presant danger to our way of life
Define "way of life."
The majority indigenous people whose voices were smothered by political correction etc are now being more vocal and angrier!
Originally posted by Kram09
reply to post by CrankyPantsUK
The majority indigenous people whose voices were smothered by political correction etc are now being more vocal and angrier!
You mean white people?
Originally posted by Kram09
reply to post by CrankyPantsUK
So, why not just say that?