It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So if you tried until you succeeded, were those really 'failures'? Your perspective on 'belief' (and 'failure') seems to be limiting.
Originally posted by digitalbluco
reply to post by Balkan
If you try enough, you'll eventually succeed.
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
It is most imprudent to simply just assume that the mind is the same as a physical body. The "mind/body problem" has never been resolved, and any assertions by so called scientists today that the mind is not separate from the body is nothing more than reification.
It is odd that a member that ends his post with Namaste would make an argument that the mind is nothing more than a physical body.
The "mind/body problem" is this: There are essentially two camps. One camp believes that the mind is a separate substance from that of the brain or body. This camp is called the Dualist camp. The other camp, the Monist camp, believes that the mind is very much a part of the physical body. It is called a "problem" because both camps have never been able to reach any resolution on the mind, which in the end means you have to make a decision as to which camp you fall into. Regardless of which camp you decide you believe more, the question then becomes, who was it that made that choice?
Originally posted by ErgoTheConfusion
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
It is most imprudent to simply just assume that the mind is the same as a physical body. The "mind/body problem" has never been resolved, and any assertions by so called scientists today that the mind is not separate from the body is nothing more than reification.
It is odd that a member that ends his post with Namaste would make an argument that the mind is nothing more than a physical body.
The "mind/body problem" is this: There are essentially two camps. One camp believes that the mind is a separate substance from that of the brain or body. This camp is called the Dualist camp. The other camp, the Monist camp, believes that the mind is very much a part of the physical body. It is called a "problem" because both camps have never been able to reach any resolution on the mind, which in the end means you have to make a decision as to which camp you fall into. Regardless of which camp you decide you believe more, the question then becomes, who was it that made that choice?
Actually I was slightly misunderstanding your stance, thus my response. I don't believe the concept the mind is nothing more than matter. I was asking the question because despite science having to basically shelve the problem for a long time... it is really the fundamental pivot point for the thread.
I'm actually more in a Biocentrism camp... which is the third camp: The physical body is very much a part of the mind.
It's a pivot point for the question because of the way it affects a person's perception of the stimulus they are getting from the external world... and thus how they will approach applying any advice they hear/read. So for people struggling with this question, they also need to ask themselves what the nature of the relationship between mind and body are for them and then move forward from there. Is mind a product of body? Body a product of mind? Both exist and are linked like a game and a player?
If Mind is a product of Body - There is nothing we can do... we are going to do whatever the plinko machine says we will do.
If Body is a product of Mind - Well... then this would depend on whether the individual's mind is the *only* mind or is in the middle of a giant "belief" game where the strongest minds and strongest beliefs held by the group mind create the visualization that is then experienced. There are no boundaries beyond what the individual can convince them self (or others) is Reality... even if they don't know if/how they are doing it.
If it's more like a game - Well then now we have a mind that is limited by some sort of rule set... but the *activity* in the game is not the source of the thoughts... although the activity in the game feeds back to the mind controlling the game and thus does affect what thoughts will be sent out next.
So while a person won't necessarily solve this question necessarily.... identifying which perspective they do hold or want to hold can affect a person's methods for moving forward in contemplation/action with their reality.
Namaste!edit on 29-7-2011 by ErgoTheConfusion because: (no reason given)
WOW !!!!!! okay this is exactly where I was trying to get to...I'm not eloquent with words but you guys are right there now. So is there a "master" mind controling my reality or do I control it ? Sometimes ? all the time? First would be to determine if I do or someone else does before REAL progress could be made. Can we know this on this playing field?
Originally posted by mr10k
I think it from time to time, and when I do, I sit in front of a candle for 5 minutes trying to "think" the flame away. Because "...If no one observes the flame, then no one knows the flame is there, and therefore the flame doesn't exist". Stupid flame never went away so I abandoned that idea long ago.
But if you look at it as "If I try to be the richest man and will myself to be then I will be" then of course sooner or later with work you will be the richest man.
Originally posted by jesusatan
but do you think I (we) will always "mess" things up just a bit to keep my sanity.?
So I'm here asking you guys to help me learn to manifest but do you think I (we) will always "mess" things up just a bit to keep my sanity.?
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
reply to post by jesusatan
So I'm here asking you guys to help me learn to manifest but do you think I (we) will always "mess" things up just a bit to keep my sanity.?
The point I was making about blowing a candle flame out to complete the thought of thinking a flame away, (I was actually riffing off of a Bogie and Bacall film), is why would we not use all tools available to us to manifest that which we desire? In the case of "thinking" a flame away, why wouldn't we just simply blow it out, since we have this demonstrable physical capability?
How do we manifest? In 2009 a pilot by the name of Chesley Sullenberger did what no other pilot in the fifty year history of aviation of jet liners the size Sullenberger was flying could do, and that was safely land a stricken airliner on the Hudson River. It was hailed as a miracle, and I suppose it was, but it was a miracle performed by a single man who manifested the necessary reality to not only save his own ass, but all of the passengers asses too!
Certainly the radar was telling Sullenberger he was screwed and it is fairly presumed that Sullenbeger ignored the radar and began looking for opportunities to safely land that plane.
Ninety percent of life happens off of the radar. If we are always focused on the radar, this means we are missing out on Ninety percent of the opportunities that exist in this world. The radar can be a useful tool when it is useful, just like putting your lips together and blowing can be useful when it is useful. When it is not useful, why use that tool?
Manifesting your reality means Being the person wise enough to know which tools to use and not use while they are Doing, so they can Have the reality they desire.
Easier said than done, but so is walking up a steep mountain. If your intention is to get to the top of that mountain, then no matter how difficult it becomes, you keep moving upward and onward until you've reached your destination. Without the firm commitment of your mind, it is unlikely you will suffer the trials and tribulations that come with climbing a steep mountain, or landing a jet airliner on an icy river, or making a gazillion bucks.