It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by PW229
Originally posted by mudbeed
reply to post by PhoenixOD
Do you guys post your OP on two posts hoping to get double the amount of stars?
I am just asking, because I see this a lot.
I mean you could have totally fit it all in one post, right?
It is that way by design in the Breaking News forum.
When you go to create a new topic here the first post is simply to outline the story and provide a link to the source. In the next section you are asked to give your own opinion on the story, when you hit "post" two OP's are made.edit on 28-7-2011 by PW229 because: Fleshed out the info for a perfectly legitimate question.
Originally posted by TheMessenger1
reply to post by facchino
or Jimbob Jollyfingers
2nd
Let me be clear – and I’m sorry if this wasn’t obvious – we are not currently supporting brands, organizations, and non-human entities in the Google+ field trial. While we should have been clearer about this, there are some fields in the registration form (asking for a first name, a last name, an age and a gender) that indicate that. Supporting these non-human entities is an obviously great feature – we have no allergy to it at all! It’s just not part of the system we are currently testing.
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Originally posted by Common Good
You guys said it was safe. You backed it.
You may be confused, we offered no such commentary on "Google+".
willingly put it on its website as a default feature.
We did not install any connectivity to Google+, just like we never installed any connectivity to Facebook or Twitter.
We installed a dormant widget for Google +1 which is a separate service, and while integrated with the social networking service, Google+, does not rely on it for complete functionality.
What I want to know, do you still trust Google enough to NOT put your members privacy at risk?
Since I've tested the Google +1 JavaScript, and watched HTTP packets in both FireFox and Chrome, yes, I'm satisfied there is no communication back to Google unless the user decides to click. If that ever changes, it will be removed.edit on 28-7-2011 by SkepticOverlord because: (no reason given)edit on 28-7-2011 by SkepticOverlord because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by xDeadcowx
I could easily see people creating account, just to check it out, using names like "lkazsjdf lakdjfhalksg"
Now, if your name really is Mr. Skdugfhslkdgfjh Glkajhgflka then i truly apologize, but that name looks completely bogus to me, and if i were an admin for that data store, i would delete you too.
Originally posted by PhoenixOD
Why does Google+ insist on having your real name?
www.bbc.co.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)
Google+ took only 24 days to reach 20 million users but their decision to delete accounts without real names attached has caused anger. So why do social networks insist on your real name?
Many people choose to conceal or alter their identity online.
Over the past few days, Google has enforced its policy for requiring a real name on its new social network Google+ by suspending accounts.
Originally posted by Cyanhide
reply to post by JennaDarling
Your obviously missing the point of this thread. This isn't a discussion about you having to enter your real life name.
The internet should be a safe haven for people, to act to be who'm ever they want to be,something you can't in the real world. The internet is a place to be anonymous.
Originally posted by JennaDarling
Originally posted by Cyanhide
reply to post by JennaDarling
Your obviously missing the point of this thread. This isn't a discussion about you having to enter your real life name.
The internet should be a safe haven for people, to act to be who'm ever they want to be,something you can't in the real world. The internet is a place to be anonymous.
On a "social" site, why would you not use your real name?
There is a place for anonymity, and a place for being yourself.
I am far more paranoid than you probably are but I use my real name on Facebook, I also assume what I post is given out to whomever they wish, once I publish, I lose control of what I publish.
If you don't want someting found out, don't publish it.
edit on 28-7-2011 by JennaDarling because: (no reason given)